Jump to content

Range Technology V8 AFM Disable Module


Lmlduradenali

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

I dont think that was related to the Range unit. People have experienced the "loss of communication" errors, without ever using a Range module.

 

That said, I've had my Range for a few months now. No problems. runs great.

Range Technologies are aware of these issues and admit it is their device causing it. The blame it on the delayed start up procedures on GM vehicles. They said if their device activates before the vehicle is done going threw its start up process it can cause these codes. They also admit there is no fix accept removing the device and reinstalling it every time it happens. You can go to their website and go to the FAQ section and it explains it a little. Seems like some people do get lucky and don't get the codes. But its not worth the risk to me to have my vehicle disabled because of this device.

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I'm ready to buy this, does anyone know of a current discount code?

I have one if you would like to buy it? I had it on my Silverado until I sold my truck. I never had a problem with it. I'll sell it for $100.

Posted

I have one if you would like to buy it? I had it on my Silverado until I sold my truck. I never had a problem with it. I'll sell it for $100.

 

THAT is the best deal around!

Posted

I just got an email from Range Technology.

The Range V8 BETA testing on the 2014 Silverado/Sierra has officially completed and they started shipping on Monday.

This device will disable V4 mode allowing your truck to run in V8 mode all the time.

Here is the web site http://www.rangetechnology.com

I am just passing the information along, I do not work for Range Technology.

 

THE KEY WORD IS "officially"

post-127588-0-58738000-1396540402_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-58738000-1396540402_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-58738000-1396540402_thumb.jpg

post-127588-0-58738000-1396540402_thumb.jpg

Posted

Been using my Range unit for several months now on my 2014. Not one hiccup.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone.

Posted

Been using my Range unit for several months now on my 2014. Not one hiccup. Sent from my iPhone.

just placed my order, I was waiting for them to finish the BETA.

 

Whoever moved my post, thanks. I knew there was another range V8 thread but I couldn't find it.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Hey Guys,

 

So I have been using my Range Technologies V8 delete module for a couple of months now. I really like having the truck in V8 mode all the time and have not seen any adverse side effects with engine codes, mileage drops, etc.

 

What I have been experiencing is a warning message when going to start the truck that says "Battery Level Low- Start Engine now." (or along those lines, cant remember the exact wording). Now I drive my truck daily. I have a 30-40 minute commute to and from work, plenty of time for the engine to run and get the battery going. It usually only sits for a couple hours at a time, either while I'm at work, or overnight at home.

 

According to Range, there is a slight electrical draw from the module when the engine is off. But if the truck is driven everyday, I should not have to unplug the unit every time I get out of the truck. They do recommend removing it if the truck will be sitting for extended periods of time, and my rule of thumb is if I know it will sit for 3 days or more, I will pull the module. Up until now this has worked fine for me. I was able to leave the truck sitting over the course of 2-3 days without being driven and I did not see any messages.

 

However, lately I have been getting the "Battery Level Low" message several times over the past few weeks, when the truck has only been sitting for 8-9 hours at max without being driven. Once again either while I am at work, or overnight. In the past few weeks its been about 1 in 4 starts will give me the message if I leave the module plugged in. And I NEVER experience it with the unit unplugged. I have never experienced an issue starting the truck when I see these messages. It will fire up normally with or without it.

 

At first I thought maybe the rough winter did a toll on my battery so I had it tested at Auto-zone with quick tester they have. Everything good. I went one step further and had it deep tested by my dealer that took about 45 minutes. They came back and said everything on the battery is fine. So now I place judgment on the Range unit. I feel having to pull the unit every time I get out of the truck is just tedious. And I don't want to be in the situation where it runs my battery down completely and I am left stranded.

 

Anyone else with the Range unit experience this? I have reached out to Range inquiring about my issue, but have not had any response yet. The only options I see are either:

 

1. Stop using the Range unit altogether.

 

2. Install a better battery that can keep up with the small voltage draw of the Range unit, since it's obvious the factory installed AC delco (or whatever it is) battery isn't cutting it.

 

3. Something I am not thinking of?

 

 

 

 

TL:DR - range unit causing low battery situation when truck is sitting for only 8-9 hours at max.

Posted

if you don't want the warning stop using the Range Unit. It piggy backs on the CANBUS network and causes interference which causes error codes to pop up. GM has a bulletin out on this as well about any device that is plugged into the ALDL port.

Posted

if you don't want the warning stop using the Range Unit. It piggy backs on the CANBUS network and causes interference which causes error codes to pop up. GM has a bulletin out on this as well about any device that is plugged into the ALDL port.

 

Its not causing that type of error. I know that issue exists. This is different. It's an excessive draw on the battery when plugged in and turned off. If i insert my key and I see this message, my voltage indicator is past the first 1/4 tick mark indicating a "low battery"

Posted

Why not just pull it out when you turn your truck off, and then plug it in when you get back in?

 

Did you read my post? Not trying to be argumentative. This is what I have been doing for the last week or so. But its tedious. I know its simple, but can get annoying after a while.

Posted

Have you measured the battery voltage at key off and then when starting and you see the message to confirm the battery is low? the low battery message is a feature of the BCM which communicates via the CANBUS system so it could be related. When I have my HPT module plugged into the truck it triggers a low battery message as well.

Posted

Have you measured the battery voltage at key off and then when starting and you see the message to confirm the battery is low? the low battery message is a feature of the BCM which communicates via the CANBUS system so it could be related. When I have my HPT module plugged into the truck it triggers a low battery message as well.

 

 

How would I go about doing this? Using a voltmeter manually on the battery?

 

That's interesting. I've just been going off the gauge. And when I get the message, the gauge is usually lower than the first 1/4 tick mark on the left side of battery volts gauge.

 

This is not actually my gauges, I just drew something up in MS paint to show you what I mean.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...