Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yup... Magnaflow 22", resonator delete, RTP dual outlet exhaust tip. Barely louder than stock... I'll be replacing the Magnaflow with Flowmaster 50..... soon!

 

 

Looks good! If you haven't had the muffler on long give it a few miles to burn in..it will get just a tad louder. I really hate to read your last statement. :nonod: I guess if you just want the sound though...

  • Like 1
Posted

Guys, I got a quick question? What high flow cats do you guys prefer? Has anybody decided to do headers all the way back yet. I'm running the 6.2.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Looks good! If you haven't had the muffler on long give it a few miles to burn in..it will get just a tad louder. I really hate to read your last statement. :nonod: I guess if you just want the sound though...

I'd be glad to take your advise! I've always preferred Magnaflow over Flowmaster. Hopefully it will burn in a little louder, nothing too obnoxious (Like my Vette! :lol: ), but a nice deep rumble...

 

Here are a couple more pix with side exit:

 

20140430_140546.jpeg

 

20140430_140503.jpeg

 

20140430_140449.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted

 

That's good info, thanks. I just ordered the #15329 yesterday. To summarize, you didn't like it mainly because the tip stuck out too far? Or was it too loud, etc?

I don't like it because the tip sticks out to far, a few more inches and you could trip on it also the 5 inch tip looks like a diesels exhaust and does not match this truck. If my truck was lifted 2.5 inches with 33's and if there was away to adjust the tip..which there is not it might look ok.

 

Other than that it sounds awesome.very mild until WOT and no drone, that is why I am having them install the same 22" muffler on the factory exhaust.

Posted

I'd be glad to take your advise! I've always preferred Magnaflow over Flowmaster. Hopefully it will burn in a little louder, nothing too obnoxious (Like my Vette! :lol: ), but a nice deep rumble...

 

Here are a couple more pix with side exit:

 

Damn those wheels!! I freakin love em!! Fine truck you have there! Yeah, I absolutely despise Flowmaster. Been around too many dyno tests where results were not so good. Some cases were less than stock. :noway:

Posted

I'd be glad to take your advise! I've always preferred Magnaflow over Flowmaster. Hopefully it will burn in a little louder, nothing too obnoxious (Like my Vette! :lol: ), but a nice deep rumble...

 

Here are a couple more pix with side exit:

 

Damn those wheels!! I freakin love em!! Fine truck you have there! Yeah, I absolutely despise Flowmaster. Been around too many dyno tests where results were not so good. Some cases were less than stock. :noway:

Posted

Damn those wheels!! I freakin love em!! Fine truck you have there! Yeah, I absolutely despise Flowmaster. Been around too many dyno tests where results were not so good. Some cases were less than stock. :noway:

Thanks David... Yeah, I do love the truck. I traded in my '13 LT and decided to go all out on this one. I'll stick with the Maggie and see how it sounds by the end of summer. Only got 300 miles on this muffler.

Posted

Thanks David... Yeah, I do love the truck. I traded in my '13 LT and decided to go all out on this one. I'll stick with the Maggie and see how it sounds by the end of summer. Only got 300 miles on this muffler.

It should If your still not happy, look into getting a Hooker Aerochamber. They have a great sound and also make great power.

  • Like 1
Posted

Other than that it sounds awesome.very mild until WOT and no drone, that is why I am having them install the same 22" muffler on the factory exhaust.

 

Cool. It'll be interesting to see how mine fits. It was only made last week so they may have updated the design. Either way I've got the tools to make it fit the way I want.

Posted

I don't like it because the tip sticks out to far, a few more inches and you could trip on it also the 5 inch tip looks like a diesels exhaust and does not match this truck. If my truck was lifted 2.5 inches with 33's and if there was away to adjust the tip..which there is not it might look ok.

 

Other than that it sounds awesome.very mild until WOT and no drone, that is why I am having them install the same 22" muffler on the factory exhaust.

I hear ya about the diesel look. The size is definitely in that ball park. If it tucked under better and didn't stick out, would you like it then??

Posted

 

Cool. It'll be interesting to see how mine fits. It was only made last week so they may have updated the design. Either way I've got the tools to make it fit the way I want.

Post up when you do! A good rule to follow on installation of catbacks is to snug clamps, adjust, snug clamps, adjust, .... then tighten!! This way everything comes out like it should.

Posted

I had the Magnaflow cat back exhaust installed part #15318. It sounds awesome with no drone! But looks like sh#t! the Magnaflow specs on their website when I ordered it said it was Tubing O.D. size 3.5 in. Tip O.D. size 4 in. well the website was wrong it's actually 4 in. Tubing O.D. size with a 5in Tip. I called Magnaflow about the advertising error on their website and all I got was an apology, they have since corrected the site except for the long box part #15329 which still shows the wrong specs. To top it off the 5 inch exhaust tip sticks out 3 1/2 inches past the body all the way to the edge of the rear bumper side step...Get-Er-Done :driving:

 

I told the Magnaflow tech that they should include a free Confederate Flag rear window sticker and a Get-Er-Done bumper sticker with those kits! I'm from SD and a card carrying right winger :M16: but this is a little to much redneck for me.

 

My GMC dealer is refunding the $750 I paid them and putting the factory exhaust back on and replacing the factory muffler with a Magnaflow 22" and removing the flapper valve then topping it off with a factory GMC chrome exhaust tip for $385. I'm having this done on 5/7. I will post updates next week.

I have the 14" magnaflow with third cat delete. Sounds Fing amazing! I also have the AFM off so if this drones when V4 is active, I couldn't say. It does not drone with my set up.

 

Mike

Posted

I hear ya about the diesel look. The size is definitely in that ball park. If it tucked under better and didn't stick out, would you like it then??

 

I will post some pics tonight so you can see how hideous it looks. I ordered it because their website specs said the Tip was 4 inches. My 2009 GMC 6.2 factory exhaust was 3.5 OD with a 4 inch tip, I liked that look.

 

The 14 factory exhaust is 3.5 like my 09 was the only difference is the goofy flapper valve and the exhaust is reduced to 3 after the resonator on the 14, and like others have pointed out the 14 exhaust is pretty stout. My accessory guy at my GMC dealership recommended adding the 22" Magnaflow and deleting the flapper valve from the beginning, but I insisted I wanted the 15318 kit..wish I would have listened to his recommendations.

Posted (edited)

I have the 14" magnaflow with third cat delete. Sounds Fing amazing! I also have the AFM off so if this drones when V4 is active, I couldn't say. It does not drone with my set up.

 

Mike

I think the 6.2L 15318 kit sounds Fing amazing!..Just looks like sh!t..maybe it would look better if the five inch tip came straight out the top of the hood! Then I could hang a bulls nut sack off my hitch. Edited by 1972c10custom
  • Like 1
Posted

Post up when you do! A good rule to follow on installation of catbacks is to snug clamps, adjust, snug clamps, adjust, .... then tighten!! This way everything comes out like it should.

Hopefully my dealer knows this..they did have four 5.3L trucks on the show floor with dual magnaflow exhausts kits and they all looked good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,867 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...