Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Edgargarcia14 said:

I got powered leather seats (black) center console, decked out steering wheel, and door panels for 860 for my 2018 lol, yall are buying everything for stupid high prices. Oh and I got high country taillights for 250 new. Stop buying the first thing you see.Screenshot_20190521-232801_Gallery.thumb.jpg.959006173573ad0e6350a10fdc1e89f6.jpg

Find me some SLT/Denali LED Tail lights for the same price.

Posted (edited)

Was able to read through more.  Does the kit you provide work for sierra 2500's? 

Edited by alderin1987
Posted
Was able to read through more.  Does the kit you provide work for sierra 2500's? 

Who was this referring to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
On ‎5‎/‎25‎/‎2019 at 7:17 AM, pgamboa said:


Who was this referring to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry I am new to forums, I was referring to your post where you were offering the whole console kit.  I am not ready to buy yet but I want to start saving for it and buy it eventually.

  • Like 1
Posted
Sorry I am new to forums, I was referring to your post where you were offering the whole console kit.  I am not ready to buy yet but I want to start saving for it and buy it eventually.

Yes - send me a PM or shoot me an email. My email is [email protected]

Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

@pgamboa I also saw a post, which I can't find now, of you saying it can play video.  Do all these series of trucks allow video playback? I have so much to learn, I have never once modded a vehicle always had stock everything, but I stumbled across this forum and it got me jacked. I am sorry for all of the basic questions, I have tried searching for the answer but I can't seem to find anything.

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Is there any difference between the 1500 vs 2500 console? I was looking to buy this one but it shows it wont fit my crew cab 1500? The part number is 84199886

 

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I completed my center console swap and posted it on YouTube. 
 

Here are the parts that I ordered to do it:

23359391 Console Assembly $329.79
   (Yes it came with the arm rest)
23467123 Upper Trim Panel $173.96
   (Yes it came with the cup holder)
23467516 Side Trim $24.25
22817347 Side Trim $52.55
22776807 Console Assembly Front Bracket $15.00
11609982 Fender Liner Bolt (X2) $3.67

 

Cost me $708 total and was completely worth it. 

 

 

  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/16/2017 at 10:47 AM, pgamboa said:


I got it from Mouser. It was one digit off in the part # from what I needed because the correct one is no where to be found. The difference in the connector is the “keying”. No biggie though. I was able to shave off portions of the connector to get it to fit. “Keying” is done so that you cannot Plug Connectors in the wrong spot.

I’ve got a wiring diagram made with pics to illustrate what I’m doing, a video to be made as well.

I also made a cross reference sheet of both connectors showing all the circuits on each. It’ll also show what circuits are present in each so that you’ll see what needs to be added. The good thing is that all the circuits in the jump seat harness ARE present in the Full Console Harness. So this will make for an easy “plug in” scenario.

What will be left at that point is landing the wireless charging lid circuit, compartment lamp circuit, wireless charge indicator circuit, and the last 12V circuit from their originations to the 42-way connector.

If I recall, they come from:

X51L Fuse Panel - Wireless Charging Lid
X51L Fuse Panel - (1) - 12V Plug
BCM - Wireless Lid Charging Indicator

I’m not home right now but will continue working on this over the next few days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi All,

 

 I have a new center console that i am going to use in replacing my current jump seat in my 2500HD. I have a new complete jump seat harness, (i didnt want to tear it out from my jump seat) an I have gotten it to where i have all the necessary splices and adds for the extra 12v and for the USB connection. I have it all ready to lay out and finalize but I need the X300 connector (not mousers # i believe)  that is mentioned, I have looked at numerous connectors on Mousers website but I would rather know I am ordering the correct one. Can you provide the connector part number? 

Edited by 15bronzeduramax
punctuation.
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...