Jump to content

5.3 versus 6.2


ASW

Recommended Posts

Posted

Its a trade off---the 6.2 has more power -----I dont think anyone needs to be convinced of that. Its a larger motor that

has more horsepower and torque. That power comes at a cost, the initial cost of the engine and the increase in fuel

cost. Not sure if insurance is more? Perhaps someone here may know. I would expect you would get some of the initial

cost difference back on resale whenever that is the 6.2 should be worth a little more than the 5.3. Bottom line is the 6.2 costs

more so is the "fun" you will have driving it worth it to you? I drove both and chose the 5.3 the extra cost was not worth

it to me. My truck with the 5.3 is rated to tow 11000 lbs(3.73's) and gets 21-22 on hwy. I am happy with it. The premium

fuel the 6.2 wants is what bothered me, the extra 50 cents per gallon adds up. Normal driving I didnt notice much difference,

I think towing 10K lbs or racing or perhaps a lifted truck with large tires the 6.2 would be noticeably better.

 

Excellent feedback. After reviewing this I think I will stick with the 5.3 unless I can get my hands on a 6.2 to test drive. My trailer is only 7,200 and only pulled during the camping season.

 

I noticed a decent drop in fuel costs from the 5.3 in my avalanche to this 5.3 truck. I feel I would go back to those fuel costs plus some with the premium.

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

^^^The 5.3L should really be "running" premium by of some of the KR people are seeing. The stock tuning could be better IMHO opinion.

 

with what you'll be towing, the 5.3L should be fine...especially if you get the 3.73 gears. I have 3.42 and I've had it up to 4K lbs for around 150 miles and towed great (in some ways better than my previous 2013 Ecoboost with 3.55 rear).

 

If I was planning on towing ~7500lbs every weekend....the 6.2L would have been a no brainer.

Posted

Just a follow up to my post in this thread way back when my truck was stock. Since then I put fabtechs 7.5" lift and some 35" dick cepek tires (truck is 9" higher then stock form/ more air resistance etc...) and this truck still goes into 4 cy mode often. Its driveability is great and this is why I got the 6.2L.

 

No need to spend thousands on CAI / exhaust / gears to make it perform as you would with the 5.3L So if you plan on lifting your vehicle/bigger meats etc.. like the other poster stated " there is truly no replacement for displacement", especially in this new 6.2L corvette / built for tq motor. Kudo's to GM engineering team on this motor.

Posted

I have driven both but I bought my 5.3 before before the 6.2's came out and didn't want to wait. The 5.3 is plenty for me, if its your only vehicle and you're a HP junkie and need the most powerful thing out there then I would say the 6.2 for sure. But, like I keep saying on this forum - its a damn truck. I have a vette w/ the same power that weighs HALF literally HALF as much as these trucks w/ the same rear end gearing, so I'm not going to fork over another $2000 on top of the $50,000 the truck costs to have the feeling of more power because its never going to be "fast". Quick for a truck sure, but not fast.

 

Also - FWIW I have been getting like 15mpg on the highway @ 80 w/ my 5.3, you know you will want to drive just as fast if not quicker in the 6.2 and I doubt it'll be better, will probably be worse, I don't believe anyone on here saying they consistently get in the 20's - its not possible. @ 65 mph on perfectly flat ground w/ a tail wind @ 58 degrees, yeah maybe.

 

Taking all that into account if I didn't have a sportbike and vette I'd probably opt for 6.2 anyhow.

This is my 6.2l life time most of this is in town. I get 21+ while driving 67-73 on the interstate.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -vututyqe.jpg

Posted

I average 16 between mainly town driving and some highway....5.3 motor. Wtf

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I'm in the market for a High Country. I test drove both the 5.3 and the 6.2 yesterday back to back. I did not feel a difference. This is really something you need to drive back to back and see if it's worth it to you. I also have a 2011 SS Camaro that is supercharged so I know how a power curve feels. I think it really comes down to a mental thing of saying "I have the 6.2" But honestly, unless your towing every day...I'm sure you won't feel a difference.

Posted

Maybe its because I have the 3:73's in my truck, but I sold my camaro as part of my plan with this truck, and Ill tell you right now there is one hell of a difference between a 5.3 and 6.2 towing or not towing... I drove a 5.3 with 3:42's and it performed the same as my 2010 5.3.. I thought it was a dog. I always wanted more power out of it. The 6.2 hands down is better in every aspect. pick up, 40-60, you name it. In fact, I am getting better gas mileage out of this 6.2 crew cab with 3:73"s then I did in my ext cab 5.3 with 3:08's
I averaged about 15mpg in my 2010 with a cai. I am averaging over 16 in this truck. its bigger, its faster, and tows a ton more all the while getting better mpg.
To me its worth every cent.
I tow once a month, nothing crazy. 3000-4000 pounds. I can tell the difference big time. If I want to tow a camper thats heavier I now can with no fears or worries about power.
and since I gave up my 2010 ss as part of this, the fact I can mash the pedal and still have some fun is just a bonus

I'm in the market for a High Country. I test drove both the 5.3 and the 6.2 yesterday back to back. I did not feel a difference. This is really something you need to drive back to back and see if it's worth it to you. I also have a 2011 SS Camaro that is supercharged so I know how a power curve feels. I think it really comes down to a mental thing of saying "I have the 6.2" But honestly, unless your towing every day...I'm sure you won't feel a difference.

Posted

I'll have to look up the gears the 2 high countries I drove had. I put them both to the floor and they both took off fast (for a truck)I didn't feel any difference. I personally won't be modding a specialty truck and I really won't be slamming on the gas around town. Maybe on the HWY.

 

I don't want to dog guys who choose either engine. To each his own. I am just offerring advice for anyone looking to buy a new one that had the same dilemma I had which is...is the 6.2 worth it. The truck is $52k. I add another $2k to the price, I might as well go with the $58k diesel which is a beast and I loved driving that but I have no need to pull down large buildings.

Posted

I'll have to look up the gears the 2 high countries I drove had. I put them both to the floor and they both took off fast (for a truck)I didn't feel any difference. I personally won't be modding a specialty truck and I really won't be slamming on the gas around town. Maybe on the HWY.

 

I don't want to dog guys who choose either engine. To each his own. I am just offerring advice for anyone looking to buy a new one that had the same dilemma I had which is...is the 6.2 worth it. The truck is $52k. I add another $2k to the price, I might as well go with the $58k diesel which is a beast and I loved driving that but I have no need to pull down large buildings.

to each their own as well. But something had to be a miss to not notice the difference in the 5.3 and 6.2

I could even tell the difference in a 2013 yukon with the old 6.2

your talking almost 100 HP between the two engines. you cant not notice that much.. at least I cant.

 

The 6.2 is a beast. but its not for everyone. as for the gears the only way to get the 3:73's is with the max tow package.. so your probably looking at 3:42's or 3:08's either way id go with the 6.2 but thats me. And Im not dogging the 5.3 It is a stout motor, but it wasnt enough for me so as soon as I saw they offered the 6.2 it was not even a question on my end.

Just wanted to share my .02

Posted

I just double checked on the chevy site. A High Country only has an option for 3.42 gears. So that's what it must of been. They were both 4WD Crew Cabs with short beds. I must be going crazy but I did not notice the difference....sorry :-\ Trust me I was really torn before I drove them on which engine option I wanted. The salesman is also a friend of mine and he was busting my chops a bit about wanting to feel the difference. I drove the 6.2l first and then when I drove the 5.3l I really just looked at him and laughed and said "Dude...I can't tell the difference other than just a bit more engine sound" and he basically said "Told you so". Its 65hp difference and 77tq difference. There is a difference in weight in the trucks too. Check out the side by side comparisons on the chevy site under capabilities its quite interesting.

 

On another note I definitely noticed a difference when I got back into my 600hp camaro to drive home, lol.

 

I just hope my post helps those that are out to buy A High Country that might not have the option to drive both (5.3l or 6.2l) or is ordering from the dealer. I don't have advice on any of the other trucks gears/engine options.

 

Thanks for all your input though.

Posted

The 5.3 on E85 is 380 HP, to close for the extra money when you can get a Texas package for under 30K.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I don't see how you can't tell a difference considering there is nearly a second difference in the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. Maybe you never tried a 20-60 highway pull

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

When the peddle was to the floor on both the trucks my adrenalin was pumping so I may not have had enough attention on my actual 0-60 time. Both are stout engines. Either way it wasn't impressive enough for me to get that "WOW" factor. I can't beleive that I didn't really feel a WHOLE second difference in that 0-60 lol.

Posted

I've seen video of the dash cluster and just visually speaking you can tell a difference between the 2!

Personally I've never driven the 5.3.

In fact I bought an all terrain and the very first one I saw was a 5.3 it was sitting in the wash bay with engine running and the sales guy asked me to drive it. I declined, not what I was looking for.. Went to a different dealer and found my 6.2 all terrain exactly the same truck as the 5.3 I was shown. And discovered it was the only one in the state! I did not know they were so rare!

My truck is at edelbrock getting fitted with the very first e force supercharger! Yes I'm a HP freak! Lol

I pity the fool that rolls up to me in a stock 5.3 or 6.2 at a light! Or a ford, dodge, Toyota, Subaru wrx, civic with a turbo! Lol hmm could probably make a long list of cars now that I think about it...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,974
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Gilkey96
    Newest Member
    Gilkey96
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 878 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Replace the fuel pump with an OEM AC-Delco.
    • Hello, first time posting here. I have an 03 Chevy 1500HD with the 6 liter gas engine. The truck ran fine until the fuel pump died on me and had to get it towed. Replaced the fuel pump with a precision pump from O’rileys and changed the fuel filter while I was there. The truck will run and drive now but it wants to idle around 500 rpm when in drive and it tries to stall if you touch the gas. It drives fine though, just doesn’t want to idle. Put a fuel pressure gauge on the rail and only have 50 psi. I guess these trucks should have 55-62 psi to run right. I thought the regulator might be the issue because when I would unplug the vacuum hose it jumped to 56 psi. Replaced the regulator and no change. The only thing I can think of is that I was sold a faulty fuel pump. Any help would be appreciated because I’d rather not have to take the bed off again if I don’t have too. Thank you!
    • I've been wrenching on GM trucks for 17 years. And I need to get something off my chest because it's been weighing on me for a long time. After all that time, all those motors, all those people standing in my bay, I've figured out there are really only two kinds of owners. The ones who already know about this. And the ones who are about to find out the hard way. A guy came into my shop a few weeks back in a 2018 Silverado 5.3. Sharp guy, maybe 35. Knew his truck cold. He'd been on the forums, read the threads, done his homework. He only rolled in so I could double-check a little module he'd already plugged in himself. Wanted a second set of eyes on it. Ten minutes, in and out, drove off happy. Two days later, a completely different story walked through the same door. Older fella this time, in a 2016 Sierra. Gorgeous truck, clearly babied, not a scratch on it. Wedding ring. Looked like a guy who took care of his stuff. He was in because his engine had started knocking on the way to work. And by the time I got the valve cover off, I already knew it was too late. Lifter collapsed. Cylinder 5. Camshaft chewed up. The whole top end shot. Same kind of truck. Same motor. Same roads, probably the same dealer. The only thing separating those two men was information. I've been at this since 2008, and I've worked on everything GM puts out. Silverados. Sierras. Tahoes. Yukons. Suburbans. Escalades. The 5.3 and the 6.2. Doesn't matter which badge is on the tailgate. They all carry the same problem. So here's the information one of those guys had and the other one didn't. It's called Active Fuel Management. AFM. GM started building it into their V6s and V8s back in 2007 to squeeze out a little better mileage on the highway. Maybe a mile or two a gallon. All to hit government fuel economy numbers. The way it works, the motor quietly shuts down half its cylinders when you're just cruising along. And the little lifters that pull that off have a tiny pin inside them that's constantly clicking in and out. Lock, unlock, lock, unlock. Hundreds of times a drive. Thousands of times a week. Eventually one of those pins wears through. The lifter drops. And it starts grinding the camshaft down like a chisel on butter. And what nobody tells you is that the shudder you feel around 40 or 50 mph? That's the system cycling. Every single time. Here's what really gets me. The pre-2007 trucks, the ones without AFM, they're bulletproof. I've got customers still daily driving them with 260,000 miles on the odometer. Not a problem in the world. GM took a perfectly good motor that would have lasted a lifetime and bolted this system onto it. And it is wrecking engines that should have run forever. The guys who hang around the forums already know all of this. So do the techs. They handled this years ago. They didn't sit around waiting for the dealership to mail them a warning letter, because that letter is never coming. It's the guys who figured somebody would've told them who end up on my lift. And I want to be clear, because this part matters. Maintenance has nothing to do with it. I've torn down motors with barely 30,000 miles on the clock. I pulled apart a Tahoe last summer with 24,000 on it. Practically a brand new truck. Owner had it less than a year. Spotless oil. Best synthetic money can buy, changed early every time. Made no difference. I've seen guys with full dealer records, every interval stamped. Made no difference. The oil changes were never the problem. The pin was. And no amount of babying that truck stops that pin from cycling every single time you drive. That's the part that eats at me. These are good motors. Take the AFM out of the equation and a 5.3 or a 6.2 will run 300,000 miles and never blink. So a few years ago I started telling every single owner who comes through my doors the exact same thing the smart guys already knew. Get yourself a FullForce disabler. It plugs right into the port under your dash. Couple of seconds and you're done. It just tells the computer to leave every cylinder running, full time. No more cycling. No more beating those lifters back and forth every time you turn the key. It doesn't reprogram anything. Doesn't touch your tune. And unplug it before a dealer visit and there's absolutely zero trace it was ever installed. I've had customers come back at 40,000, 60,000, 80,000 miles after I put one in. Zero issues. The trucks run smoother. And the lifters aren't getting beaten to death every single drive. I won't sit here and tell you it's magic. A lifter that's already damaged is a lifter that's already damaged, and this won't un-ring that bell. But it takes away the one thing causing all that wear in the first place. That's the whole game. You don't need a five-thousand-dollar delete. You don't need an expensive tune. You don't need to tear anything apart. You just need to stop the cycling. I'm not writing this for any company. I'm writing it because I'm tired of watching the guys who didn't know pay four and five figures for it. I'm tired of being the guy who has to break the news. I'm tired of knowing that the guys who did know fixed the whole thing for the price of a tank of gas, and the only difference was that somebody told them first. If you drive a Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Yukon, Suburban, or Escalade from 2007 or newer with a V6 or V8, you've got AFM. You've got those lifters, and they're cycling every single time you drive. So be the guy who already knew. Not the one I'm scraping metal out of next month. EDIT: A bunch of folks asked, so here it is. The one I put my faith in is FullForce. This is where to find it: https://www.tryfullforce.com/products/fullforce™-afm-dfm-disabler They back it with a 60-day guarantee too. I've handed out more than I can count and not one's ever come back to me. Not one. See less
    • Thanks for following along. I'm not author material, my tenses are all over the place and an editor would have a heck of a time cleaning up after me. Reading and writing is still a fun pastime though.   My new scanner came in yesterday, wow, where the heck has this thing been?! It connects right up to the Blazer, there's all kinds of bidirectional tests like EGR activation and percentage, toggle the fuel pump relay, EVAP purge valve, IAC control, AC relay, reset the transmission's adaptive learning, toggle shift solenoids and TCC lockup, and I can reset fuel trims with the click of a button...all things I could have used over the last 60 days!   It's also telling me there is a stored code in the ABS module for front left wheel sensor open and something about the brake switch. The ABS dash light works. It illuminates normally during the self-test at key on/ start and that's it. I cleared the codes and will see if they set when I take it out later. That, and I'm going to get (hopefully) real data on timing and cam ******. The PID's are there.   I connected the tool to my truck...holy smokes. Newer vehicles make early OBDII vehicles look like 8-bit, pixelated, early Nintendo stuff. This? This is like wearing 3D virtual reality goggles playing one of those elaborate, cinematic video games with seasons and plots in comparison. There are SO MANY modules and SO MANY tests and SO MUCH data. There's a scanner sequence for filling the coolant...   End of the day, it's a tool with way more power than I need, but the versatility to do old and new is there (and I need an adapter to connect it to my OBDI Camaro). It will allow me to do the first pass of diagnosis when out-of-warranty vehicles need help, and it will enable more DIY maintenance like brake system bleeding, ABS bleed, etc. I probably over-bought here, but, mission is accomplished.   Enjoy your Sunday...I need to shut this machine down and go get ready for the week ahead.
    • Not that I've read, after all the issues they've had in the past I'm pretty sure they learned their lesson. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...