Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thanks to everyone, problem solved.

 

Take a look at the boat I have been building for two and a half years. Go to packsail.com

 

 

Tom Pack

Sorry from the beginning I believed you. But thanks to everyone here the problem is solved? Was this real? I'm VERY sorry if this is real and I have accused you of being fake, but what was this sudden resolution on the issue?

Edited by txab
Posted (edited)

Why would OP want to even come back? The way you guys are so quick to pounce on someone. The guy doesn't visit internet forums like this, but when he does for the first time, just looking to see if anyone else might have seen this issue, everyone wants to pull out their "BS meter". Well quit playing with your BS meter. It's no wonder why I'm beginning to hear talk around that GMT is not as friendly as it once was.

 

OP and I have had on ongoing pm back and forth trying to convince him that this is a decent place. He posted his website because after he told me his background, I told him he should introduce himself to others here on the site. He's not here to sell a boat to any of us

 

Here's just a little of what he let me in on:

 

A little about me:

I am an ex Marine pilot with over 600 combat missions in Vietnam

Also a retired Merchant Marine Ship Captain

I have a website, packsail dot com

 

 

 

The guy was shot down like 4 times and at age 72, he has gotten into designing/building catamarans. What will a lot of us be doing at 72? Probably sitting around and crapping diapers. :)

 

Be patient lets see what else OP posts if he does. I wouldn't blame for not coming back. He owes us nothing after the way he has been treated by some on here. And yes some of your posts have been deleted because they served no purpose other than to attack OP.

Edited by txab
  • Like 3
Posted

Nope, doesn't add up. I call bs too..

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

Why would OP want to even come back? The way you guys are so quick to pounce on someone. The guy doesn't visit internet forums like this, but when he does for the first time, just looking to see if anyone else might have seen this issue, everyone wants to pull out their "BS meter". Well quit playing with your BS meter. It's no wonder why I'm beginning to hear talk around that GMT is not as friendly as it once was.

 

OP and I have had on ongoing pm back and forth trying to convince him that this is a decent place. He posted his website because after he told me his background, I told him he should introduce himself to others here on the site. He's not here to sell a boat to any of us

 

Here's just a little of what he let me in on:

 

 

 

The guy was shot down like 4 times and at age 72, he has gotten into designing/building catamarans. What will a lot of us doing at 72? Probably sitting around and crapping our diaper. :)

 

Be patient lets see what else OP posts if he does. I wouldn't blame for not coming back. He owes us nothing after the way he has been treated by some on here. And yes some of your posts have been deleted because they served no purpose other than to attack OP.

That's what I was hoping for, but I just didn't understand how all of a sudden thanks to everyone here the problem was resolved.. I see now why he mentioned his boat link, but unfortunately whenever people usually post links to their businesses like that it IS for something sub-par. This is obviously on the up and up, as I thought it was from the beginning. I feel bad I doubted my instincts now.

 

I hope the OP does come back and we all get a chance to know him, and hopefully show him more respect, which he clearly deserves.

 

To OP and person I quoted:

 

Thank you both for protecting me. You are both heros.

Edited by txab
Posted

Ok. OP sent me a PM clarifying things a bit.

 

 

My problem was solved, not the truck's problem. My problem was that the service department checked out both of the truck problems and said they could not duplicate either the transmission problem or the unintended acceleration problem, therefore there was nothing else they could do. Then I went to the service manager and complained that they need to do something more to try and solve these problems. He said he would check it out and call me. Two days later the owner of the dealership called me.

 

He said that they want to give me a free loaner truck just like mine and have their top service technician drive mine every day for weeks or months to see if he can duplicate either of my two problems. That solves my problem, regardless of the outcome. If they come back in two months and say that they were never able to duplicate anything, I will be satisfied.

Tom

Posted

Wow, so you are going to let a dealership drive your truck for 2 months while you make the payments on it. That wouldn't fly far with me.

Posted

He got a free loaner just like his, that would work for me. Be a good time to see the US, driving vacation time.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I've had my 2014 Sierra nine months and I just had the same thing happen with my truck. I kept hitting the brake pad and nothing happen. Well, something happened. It's called a Ford Taurus and he then was pushed into a Lexus. This happened tonight so we'll see what the dealership says. I won't drive it until its been thoroughly checked out and they sign off on it.

Posted (edited)

I am not going to dispute whether the truck's wheels was still engaged by the engine's driven inertia, but I can honestly say this truck has issues downshifting when braking at times.

My transmission hesitates at times not knowing what to do, it feels like it is holding back from downshifting.

I have had to do a few quick brakes when traffic light change, appling brakes the vehicle lags from downshifting and always feels like it is in a higher gear than required. This is how they are reaching their amazing numbers for mileage, however this vehicle really only drives proper at highway speed except the "shaking and vibration issues" all other daily driving I have experienced early upshifts to get the mileage , and delayed clunking downshifts that keeps the vehical's forward inertia locked.

So yes for Sue's claims this might feel like the car is still being driven when brakes are applied.

I wonder if these shift solenoids, or the transmission module has changed since last years model, because this transmission behaves much differently laging at times. I would have thought that if one applies brakes the transmission's forward inertia should be realeased starting downshifting immediately, however I have witnessed in my vehicle this seems to lay for some folks including mine.

I am still standing by the fact there is a leaking interal pump seal in some of these trucks, causing incorect pressure for solenoids to read and act on, or faulty cheap solenoids like the Dodge Ram had a few years ago.

I think GM bought from same supplier, but cannot confirm this though!

I bet that GM acts quickly getting their new 8speed into 1500 model asap, as many have been unhappy with the way this current transmission is preforming, and GM knows of more serious issues then we are aware of.

I can believe others claimes, of forward inertia but not the engine rpm above idle range.

This is my humble opinion.

Edited by 2strokesmoke
Posted

I can feel for anyone has something like this happen. A couple of years ago my truck decided not to idle down when I pulled into a parking lot one day. Nearly hit the vehicle parked in front of me. Thankfully it never happened again but if I wasn't paying attention that day it could of been a real bad situation. Hopefully the OP gets some answers and resolutions to his situation.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

This is NOT BS, my truck did this several times...got the the "no light on, no problem with this truck, can't replicate" speech by some idiot service manager. Why on earth would someone make this up?! I am just coming across this thread tonight for the first time, I explain that I had the same issue here:

 

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/162450-does-your-2014-do-this/?p=1478378

 

I made that post on July 16th, never in my experience have I had a vehicle do this. But, to this date I haven't been driving it because its been at my dealer for water leaks, and other various issues for about a month now.

Posted

Hello sinnerz,

 

I'm sorry to hear you've experienced this same acceleration issue in your Denali along with the other various issues. I know it's very inconvenient to be without your vehicle for a long period of time. I'd be happy to contact your dealer for a follow up on your behalf at any time. Don't hesitate to send a private message if this is something of interest. I'll be on the lookout for updates in the future.

 

Sincerely,

 

Eddie A.

GM Customer Care

Posted

Similar experience as this can suddenly happen to anyone. My wife and her friends took my old '02 Silverado on a road trip a few years back. She prepared to exit the interstate and turned off the cruise control. The truck started accelerating as she entered the off-ramp. She tried several things before shifting the truck to neutral and turning off the ignition. Pretty calm considering a truck full of screaming women. She called AAA and had the truck towed 200 miles to my local Chevy dealer. Here's what they found:

 

post-134418-0-30433900-1413592581_thumb.jpg

 

The State was chip-sealing the highway and a rock bounced around under the hood until it fell perfectly under the throttle stop (not sure the exact term) on the throttle body. It was a million-in-one shot. The service department had never seen anything like it. In theory, that rock could have fallen out during the tow and then it would be the old "no problem found" scenario. I totally agree with the moderator on cutting the OP some slack as these things really do happen. I realize this is an old topic but did the OP ever get an answer on what caused his issue?

post-134418-0-30433900-1413592581_thumb.jpg

post-134418-0-30433900-1413592581_thumb.jpg

post-134418-0-30433900-1413592581_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...