Jump to content

Questions about upgrading to a 2014


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

If you do upgrade... you owe it to yourself to atleast test drive the 6.2L. I drove a 5.3 and though it was ok but the 6.2 is a completely different beast that you won't be disappointed with.

Posted

I would rather have the 13...

 

Never got a single complement on my truck and bunch of issues

 

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

If you do upgrade... you owe it to yourself to atleast test drive the 6.2L. I drove a 5.3 and though it was ok but the 6.2 is a completely different beast that you won't be disappointed with.

Absolutely agree with this. I made mistake once of getting a 5.3 after having my 05 Duramax. Not this time got a 6.2 and it's a beast.

Shop around call different dealers and be willing to drive 4-5 hours to get the best deal.

Posted

Ive said it before I will say again, I went in 12/31/13 to buy a left over Denali because of the deals. I drove a 14 Texas package bought it. Look at the Allstar package or the Texas packages good deals there. I paid 31K drive out. If you want the 6.2 ( don't blame you) expect the packages for them to start at about 10K more. But don't drive one if your on the fence because you will buy it.

Posted

 

 

Absolutely agree with this. I made mistake once of getting a 5.3 after having my 05 Duramax. Not this time got a 6.2 and it's a beast.

Shop around call different dealers and be willing to drive 4-5 hours to get the best deal.

Absolutely agree with this. I made mistake once of getting a 5.3 after having my 05 Duramax. Not this time got a 6.2 and it's a beast.

Shop around call different dealers and be willing to drive 4-5 hours to get the best deal.

I went almost 8hrs away to get mine.
Posted

I'm in a similar boat as the OP. I have a 2009 F150 and there isn't anything signifigant wrong with it, but I want a new truck. Seems like a good time to get rid of it before it needs new tires, or something goes wrong.

 

+63 hp, +63ft/lbs, and i'd save about $500/year in fuel. There is also the peace of mind of being on warranty again. But I really don't NEED a new truck.... but there are some really good deals right now.

 

 

I'd get the 6.2L as it still gets better mpg than my current truck, but I'm not paying an extra 10k to get the LTZ.

Posted

I traded in a 2011 Silverado LT on a 2014 LTZ and am very happy with it. I had two recalls (fire and rear window) and my radio illumination fixed. I have had no other issues, but decided to change the 20" Continentals out for Michelins and am glad I did - rides now like a Cadillac and handles much better. Great truck.

 

One thing I have observed from reading on the forums...this is a completely NEW truck design, so do not assume anything works the way your old one did. I had a 2001 Silverado, 2002 Tundra, 2011 Silverado and other assorted vehicles. The systems and drive train are very different than any of the others. The radio, heated/cooled seats, HVAC controls all have different features than what I had before and most is controlled by the computer with limited user controls. The 5.3L is more powerful and different design than my 2011.

 

Just my observation, but many on here are frustrated because things didn't work the way they were used to, or thought it should be and no one told them different. I am one who reads the Owner Manual and keeps PDF copy handy since these trucks are more complicated than others I've owned. Lots of great info on here, so others can be completely informed.

 

And yes, you should read about the serious issues some members are experiencing. There are several threads on here listing the issues.

 

Again, drive it, drive it, drive it and test it.

Posted

One thing I have observed from reading on the forums...this is a completely NEW truck design, so do not assume anything works the way your old one did. I had a 2001 Silverado, 2002 Tundra, 2011 Silverado and other assorted vehicles. The systems and drive train are very different than any of the others. The radio, heated/cooled seats, HVAC controls all have different features than what I had before and most is controlled by the computer with limited user controls. The 5.3L is more powerful and different design than my 2011.

 

 

Not totally new. Same 6 speed trans, front suspension, basic frame. Should have been named GMT950...

Posted

Not totally new. Same 6 speed trans, front suspension, basic frame. Should have been named GMT950...

 

that's a little extreme don't ya think??? for the ones who claim that this truck is not much different then the gmt 900 or GM didn't change enough things, how would yall do it if yall were the gm president or whoever is in charge? you think they are going to change the frames, front and rear suspensions, trans, diff, interior, exterior, engine every time they come out with a new model? I mean I agree on some things that I think GM missed the mark on but for the most part the k2 trucks are pretty different than the gmt 900 and are much better. they have a completely new motor, direct injection, 12 bolt diff, completely new interior, and a modified exterior. what more could they have possibly done to change the truck? again just to remind you, I do think that they missed the mark on some things i.e. HID headlights, slow thorottle response. don't get me wrong you have the right to your own opinion but I respectfully disagree with you and think your comment IMO is a bit extreme.

Posted

I could have swore disabling auto door locks was in my personal settings through MyLink. Truck is hundreds of miles away so I can't go verify this but it seems like I seen it in there.

Posted

 

that's a little extreme don't ya think??? for the ones who claim that this truck is not much different then the gmt 900 or GM didn't change enough things, how would yall do it if yall were the gm president or whoever is in charge? you think they are going to change the frames, front and rear suspensions, trans, diff, interior, exterior, engine every time they come out with a new model? I mean I agree on some things that I think GM missed the mark on but for the most part the k2 trucks are pretty different than the gmt 900 and are much better. they have a completely new motor, direct injection, 12 bolt diff, completely new interior, and a modified exterior. what more could they have possibly done to change the truck? again just to remind you, I do think that they missed the mark on some things i.e. HID headlights, slow thorottle response. don't get me wrong you have the right to your own opinion but I respectfully disagree with you and think your comment IMO is a bit extreme.

Your on the mark, the only question I have is people complaining about slow throttle response. I have a few rides they all react different, I have no problem pushing the go pedal a little more or less. I wish I had a time machine to send some of the young back a few decades, the quality is there and the prices are comparable to the past. It all depends on how loaded up model you go.

Posted

Your on the mark, the only question I have is people complaining about slow throttle response. I have a few rides they all react different, I have no problem pushing the go pedal a little more or less. I wish I had a time machine to send some of the young back a few decades, the quality is there and the prices are comparable to the past. It all depends on how loaded up model you go.

 

by slow throttle response i mean that you have push the skinny pedal a little further down for the truck to move a little faster. it's not because it's a lack of power but as the comp is managing the torque so it can save some fuel. you ever notice when you take off it kinda seems slow and then around 1800-2000rpms it's like in the movies when they hit their "nawz" button it kinda throws you back in a the seat (not that extreme just making an example).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...