Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My bows came over of the course of weeks. I suppose you could try that and see how it works. That really is the only way to know, by trying it.

 

Maybe the best approach is to get the bows fixed and then install it right away to keep them attached?

 

Frank

Posted

My bows came over of the course of weeks. I suppose you could try that and see how it works. That really is the only way to know, by trying it.

 

Maybe the best approach is to get the bows fixed and then install it right away to keep them attached?

 

Frank

 

Right, only right after the GM "fix" is applied. Maybe I'll give it a shot.

Posted

Guys,

 

I seriously think the problem lies in the hatch door. The buffeting in my car was coming on and off on the same roads on different days. That was because sometimes the door is properly closed and other times it is not. Last night I observed it clearly. I drove with my friends to the city and it was buffeting like hell. My friends noticed as quite bothersome. Then, I opened the hatch door and slammed it hard. After that buffeting disappeared (or at least 80% of it), and it all felt like normal, even driving on the same roads.

 

I believe if the rear hatch door is adjusted properly, seals are fixed, and vibrations from wheel are fixed then buffeting should disappear, or at least most of it should disappear.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

What do you think is causing the booming noise when driving over bumps in the road? Im not suffering from buffeting at highway speeds, just the ear pressure and the booming.

Edited by Ozzii
Posted

What do you think is causing the booming noise when driving over bumps in the road? Im not suffering from buffeting at highway speeds, just the ear pressure and the booming.

That *could* be related to the hatch as well, IMHO. The hatch might be bouncing down into the opening of the truck as it bounces up over the bump. I thought I had improved it with my foam experiments, but I couldn't reproduce it. The booming is prominent when driving over snowy roads.

 

Adjusting the stops on the hatch can also make the buffeting better/worse. I wrapped them in painters tape and make 1/2 turn adjustments at a time.

 

My Yukon will be going back to the dealership soon for a close examination of the hatch and the seals. Among other things. I'm sure they've got better ways of ensuring proper fitment.

 

My experiments are on hold because it's gotten cold and I have had little time. Though I did try removing the amp fuse (#48 on passenger side) last night to rule out ANC. It made no difference to the buffeting.

Posted (edited)

Guys,

 

I seriously think the problem lies in the hatch door. The buffeting in my car was coming on and off on the same roads on different days. That was because sometimes the door is properly closed and other times it is not. Last night I observed it clearly. I drove with my friends to the city and it was buffeting like hell. My friends noticed as quite bothersome. Then, I opened the hatch door and slammed it hard. After that buffeting disappeared (or at least 80% of it), and it all felt like normal, even driving on the same roads.

 

I believe if the rear hatch door is adjusted properly, seals are fixed, and vibrations from wheel are fixed then buffeting should disappear, or at least most of it should disappear. AMEN sas06, I hope they listen to you. I have known this all along and no one listened . They would rather rip the interior out, yank the exhaust off, putty/caulk the roof, buy off brand tires and wheels, mess with the radio, yank fuses out, pull out the drive shaft, rip out the rear end , disconnect the air line from the new shocks, replace the shocks with aftermarket junk, pull the fenders off and add supports, re flash the transmission, and even tamper with the motor on a $70,000.00 brand new car. Geeze Louise !!! Unbelievable........... All the best, Booty

Edited by Booty
Posted (edited)

AMEN sas06, I hope they listen to you. I have known this all along and no one listened . They would rather rip the interior out, yank the exhaust off, putty/caulk the roof, buy off brand tires and wheels, mess with the radio, yank fuses out, pull out the drive shaft, rip out the rear end , disconnect the air line from the new shocks, replace the shocks with aftermarket junk, pull the fenders off and add supports, re flash the transmission, and even tamper with the motor on a $70,000.00 brand new car. Geeze Louise !!! Unbelievable........... All the best, Booty

 

To be fair, GM did mostly eliminate my vibration issues by replacing 2 tires, road force balancing them all (twice) and replacing the rear axle.

 

It's the buffeting that hasn't been fixed. And the hatch is now a target for examination...

Edited by FogDucker
Posted (edited)

Thinking outloud

 

If the rear hatch was the true source of the issue, don't you think GM would have fixed that by now almost 1.5 years after the initial reports

 

It would not be expensive for new bushings, tighter couplings, new lock, etc

 

The roof, OTOH, is a major repair expense and even more so if you want to redesign it mid production

Edited by boazEarl8
Posted (edited)

I should also say that:

 

For me as the buffeting has been varying from time to time, it also has been varying from speed to speed, disappearing and reappearing at various speeds. This too can be caused by varying situations of the rear hatch.

 

I have played with door stoppers as well as felt pads. Each change of circumstances changes the level of buffeting and the speed at which it occurs. Last few days I roamed in the city trying to find roads where buffeting does not happen. I found one recently built. This road is super smooth with almost no imperfections. There is almost no buffeting on this road even at very high speeds. I think as the rear of the car (being extra long) shakes/vibrates due to imperfections on the road the hatch may not be able to hold to its strength causing the buffeting to occur. Felt pads are no solution as they tend to leave room in between doors. One should get the seals fixed and the door adjusted.

 

As FogDucker has said, the booming and buffeting both seem to be caused by the hatch. But I would still not completely discount some role played by the roof sheet of metal. As Frank has reported a fix earlier. I would say it could be either one of these issues or it could be a combination of both. But hatch should be a starting point of investigations.

Edited by sas06
  • Like 1
Posted

Have to say if media reports, including this forum, are correct about the quantity of suv examples that consistently exhibit these problems, then GM must already know the cause of the problem. They've had ample time and certainly have the engineering resources to figure it out. This isn't some anomalous electrical gremlin affecting a handful of vehicles.

 

Think the real issue is whether they feel compelled to put what is likely a costly fix into production or want to band aid the affected owners/units until a mid cycle redesign.

Posted

I think that GM has been barking up the wrong tree, confusing buffeting with vibrations. They're looking at it as if it's the same problem and I don't think it is.

 

When I first reported the buffeting to my dealership 3 months ago, they declared that I had vibrations. I didn't disagree. A few visits, parts and picoscopes later, my vibrations are 99% gone. My Yukon is smooth right up to 90mph. The vibrating, it turns out, has nothing to do with the buffeting. They may have incorrectly assumed that the vibrating was causing the buffeting.

 

The biggest challenge with the buffeting is that not everyone can hear it and even if they can, everyone will interpret the severity differently. Everything from "Holy sh!t, my ears are bleeding and my head is going to explode!" to "Whatever, it sounds like we're in a tunnel." Very subjective. Then add the fact that it's prominently heard only in the driver's seat, only at 2 speeds [40mph and 70mph]. Then add the fact that there doesn't seem to be any consistent or cost effective way to measure buffeting either, at least that I've found.

 

The fact that my dealership and GM field engineer(s) are still actively working on trying to resolve the buffeting tells me that they don't know what the root cause is. If it really was an expensive fix, they would have told me to pound salt or agreed to take my truck back. It's possible that they've had the wrong people working on the issue - drivetrain specialists instead of noise & vibration specialists. It's also possible that GM doesn't have the right tools or expertise to properly diagnose this issue. All we can do is speculate because we have little or no visibility into how GM is managing the buffeting issue. Well, speculate and MacGyver with our $70K trucks, pulling fuses, removing panels, removing spare tires, manipulating seals, adding Dynamat to our roofs... If anything, we are a persistent bunch that really like our trucks and want them corrected! I sure as hell do!

 

That's why I think it would be totally awesome to have an expert in vehicle aerocoustics get involved. PhD grade that has spent years living and breathing this kind of stuff. Someone like Franck Pérot from EXA.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think that GM has been barking up the wrong tree, confusing buffeting with vibrations. They're looking at it as if it's the same problem and I don't think it is.

 

When I first reported the buffeting to my dealership 3 months ago, they declared that I had vibrations. I didn't disagree. A few visits, parts and picoscopes later, my vibrations are 99% gone. My Yukon is smooth right up to 90mph. The vibrating, it turns out, has nothing to do with the buffeting. They may have incorrectly assumed that the vibrating was causing the buffeting.

 

The biggest challenge with the buffeting is that not everyone can hear it and even if they can, everyone will interpret the severity differently. Everything from "Holy sh!t, my ears are bleeding and my head is going to explode!" to "Whatever, it sounds like we're in a tunnel." Very subjective. Then add the fact that it's prominently heard only in the driver's seat, only at 2 speeds [40mph and 70mph]. Then add the fact that there doesn't seem to be any consistent or cost effective way to measure buffeting either, at least that I've found.

 

The fact that my dealership and GM field engineer(s) are still actively working on trying to resolve the buffeting tells me that they don't know what the root cause is. If it really was an expensive fix, they would have told me to pound salt or agreed to take my truck back. It's possible that they've had the wrong people working on the issue - drivetrain specialists instead of noise & vibration specialists. It's also possible that GM doesn't have the right tools or expertise to properly diagnose this issue. All we can do is speculate because we have little or no visibility into how GM is managing the buffeting issue. Well, speculate and MacGyver with our $70K trucks, pulling fuses, removing panels, removing spare tires, manipulating seals, adding Dynamat to our roofs... If anything, we are a persistent bunch that really like our trucks and want them corrected! I sure as hell do!

 

That's why I think it would be totally awesome to have an expert in vehicle aerocoustics get involved. PhD grade that has spent years living and breathing this kind of stuff. Someone like Franck Pérot from EXA.

My thoughts are: The hatch is positioned to the body by robot. Then the human worker installs the bolts, then somewhere down the line the gasket is installed, the hatch is closed and the car moves on down the line. The hatch is large in area (big drum) and is exposed to lots of air pressure. So with a lousy weak seal/gasket and a misaligned hatch and latch you will get the drum affect in your ears. I do not know why my hatch is tight and others are not tight ? Are there 2 robots that place the hatches to the bodies ? And one is calibrated different in the positioning spec ? Is there a real inspection on the closing of the hatch or " Yep, she closes she does, she does" "Move her on down the line boys " Hee Haw type of inspection ? Maybe our GM "line experts" will respond with an answer. With best regards, Booty

Posted

My experiences of today:

 

I went to back of my car opened the hatch and started looking at various places in detail. I noticed that the hinge on the right side did not seem symmetric to the ones on the left in terms of how they were joined. The positions of the bolts were slightly different. Upon a more careful inspection I found that the hatch was leaning down from the right side slightly (not easy to notice though). I could also point out the impact point of the hatch to the body on the right side (at the bottom of the hatch), some paint has also been damaged there.

 

Then I opened the door stopper of the right side as much as I could and also opened the left one but only slightly.

 

Upon driving I noticed considerable change in conditions as follows:

 

1. Booming was now less bothersome to the ears. It certainly lessened. I am not completely sure whether it was because the cabin was now less air tight or because the hatch now didn't made the impact on the body.

 

2. Also noticed that the road noise was slightly more than before. This can be certainly due to the fact that the cabin is now not as air tight and noise can easily come in.

 

3. Buffeting also kind of lessened and changed as well. What I noticed was that while driving when the speed of the car stabilizes to say 110 Kmph and stays there. At this point as soon as there are sudden imperfect road conditions the buffeting happens for a while and then subsides and so on. I guess the hatch could now be a bit more shaky on rough surfaces due to road impact.

 

But if people believe that had the hatch been the only problem, GM would have fixed it long ago and the problem is actually deeper... THEN ... my theory is that the cabin in these cars may not be balanced/symmetric in such a way that the hatch finds it hard to settle down and buffets. I hope my theory is wrong because if it is the problem with the cabin itself then it may not be fixable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
    • $2.20 E-85 down from $2.59 Around $3.80 for regular and about $5 on average for Premium.  Propane $3.99 a gallon. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...