Jump to content

AutoGuide HD truck comparison


Recommended Posts

Posted

Was going to put this in the industry news section, but more people that are interested in the HD's would be more likely to see it here.

 

 

Automakers love to play the numbers game, especially when it comes to big trucks. A recent spat between Ram and Ford saw both companies claiming the “best-in-class” towing title for their respective heavy duty pickups like kids in a sandbox arguing over who has the better castle.

 

More at link. http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2014/10/2015-heavy-duty-truck-comparison.html

post-29472-0-91749500-1413228182_thumb.jpg

post-29472-0-91749500-1413228182_thumb.jpg

post-29472-0-91749500-1413228182_thumb.jpg

post-29472-0-91749500-1413228182_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thanks for the article !

Posted

This seems to be the way most hd comparisons end. The numbers sheet says that the GM is gonna get killed by the ford and ram, but when drag racing or real world testing comes in the GM usually wins.

Posted

This seems to be the way most hd comparisons end. The numbers sheet says that the GM is gonna get killed by the ford and ram, but when drag racing or real world testing comes in the GM usually wins.

Correct.

 

Duramax + Allison = winning combination

Posted

What's also impressive is the the LML has been the same since 2011 and still can beat out the other big 2.... And ford just put a more powerful tune on this years 6.7

 

And the Allison truely is an amazing transmission... It's always in the right gear no matter what

Posted

The towing tests have a lot to do with weight, the Duramax is 1000lbs lighter than the ford just about...wait till 2015 models for ford, they are putting a massive turbo in them. Huge potential, it's gonna be another rocket like the 6.4 but only faster cuz of the piezo injectors can flow a lot of fuel...

 

2015-2016 is gonna be interesting year for HD trucks...

Posted

By the way, I think the new torq shift is a damn smooth tranny too. Ford really did their homework with this one, my dads truck has been pretty solid. Has 100k on it, gets wicked mileage and pulls pretty damn good. I just don't like that junk turbo on them, falls flat on it's face at 60mph or so. Spools ultra quick cuz it's so small but lacks the good up top pull you need on the highway.

Posted

What's also impressive is the the LML has been the same since 2011 and still can beat out the other big 2.... And ford just put a more powerful tune on this years 6.7

 

And the Allison truely is an amazing transmission... It's always in the right gear no matter what

The 2015? If that's what ur talkin about they got rid of the junk single sequential replaced it with a gt37 Garrett and added bigger injector tips. Few other fuel things changed too, when they crack the ECM on that bad boy I bet it will make over 600rwhp on spicy tuna's

Posted

Well personally I have very little experience with diesels. I know how they work and how turbos work but I've never wrenched on a diesel. I wonder just because they are pulling an enormous amount of power out of these motors. That places a high demand on what the turbo and engine must do to achieve that power. Stressing major componants can lead to big failure. So if a manufacturer, ford, gm or ram, tries to pull almost 900 foot pounds out of a 6.6 or 6.7 etc, and sourses sub par parts and components, they could fail catastrophically. So I suppose my pondering has more to do with build quality than just big power

Posted

Well personally I have very little experience with diesels. I know how they work and how turbos work but I've never wrenched on a diesel. I wonder just because they are pulling an enormous amount of power out of these motors. That places a high demand on what the turbo and engine must do to achieve that power. Stressing major componants can lead to big failure. So if a manufacturer, ford, gm or ram, tries to pull almost 900 foot pounds out of a 6.6 or 6.7 etc, and sourses sub par parts and components, they could fail catastrophically. So I suppose my pondering has more to do with build quality than just big power

Well they are built quite well to be honest,

For it to runaway it has to be a perfect storm situation. Possibility? Yes but anything is possible. Is it likely? Doubt it. So you obviously understand how a diesel will run away right?

 

My motor took (stock rotating assembly) 65 pounds of boost and stock injectors maxed out for 200k, made around 650hp to the rear wheel. Never had one issue with the rest of the trucks drivetrain, besides built tranny. What I'm trying to get at, is they are built pretty damn tough man...every time they up the hp and torque they make parts better. I know of at least a dozen newish LML Duramax running 800hp on stock bottom end...

Posted

Anything is a possibility! Runaways are perfect storm situations for sure. It will be very interesting to see where HD trucks go in the next few years. I only questioned the runaway possibility because I watched a video of a 2015 duramax bone stock run away. Granted it's a 1 in a 1,000,000 truck but still, it just got me wondering.

Posted

Anything is a possibility! Runaways are perfect storm situations for sure. It will be very interesting to see where HD trucks go in the next few years. I only questioned the runaway possibility because I watched a video of a 2015 duramax bone stock run away. Granted it's a 1 in a 1,000,000 truck but still, it just got me wondering.

Turbo seal or bearing?

Posted

Turbo seal or bearing?

Couldn't tell you honestly, it was just a video of the truck billowing smoke and then it seizing up and blowing what I assume to be a part of the cooling system. I would think seal just because it seems more likely but I can't say for sure.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,944 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...