Jump to content

Yes or no?


Recommended Posts

Posted

imagejpg1_zpsf045f43f.jpg

 

Truck specs:

2015 Chevy Colorado Z71

BDS 6 Lift Kit (prototype)

Fox 2.5 Remote Coilovers

35 Nitto Terra G2 Tires

20 Eagle Alloy 012 wheels

30 Rigid RDS lightbar

N-Fab nerf steps

Extang tonneau cover

Magnaflow exhaust

 

http://bds-suspension.com/blog/?p=8164

Posted

No for me on the Colorado. Canyon would look much better, IMO.

 

I did see a black Colorado Z71 with black wheel arch moldings that looked much better than that one though.

Posted

looks nice ? BUT NO leg room , seats could be inprove. bad for a long road trip. good for a short person. and for the money you can get a Silverado/sierra . (lot more extras )

Posted

I still think the front end looks like a crossover, but maybe it will grow on me. I like how GM made the Canyon look like a smaller Sierra so I don't know why they didn't make the Colorado look like a small Silverado and went 2 completely different directions with them.

Posted

looks nice ? BUT NO leg room , seats could be inprove. bad for a long road trip. good for a short person. and for the money you can get a Silverado/sierra . (lot more extras )

 

How about some more clarification rather than a grade school ramble?

 

No legroom? Where? Front? Back? The old Gen 1 Colorado's had tons of front leg room for tall people (ask me how I know at 6'5) and this gen keeps the same amount. Back seat gained 3 inches over the gen 1 and has 2 more than the Tacoma I believe and maybe more than a extended cab silverado? If not a more relaxed seating position for sure.

 

So far all the reviews are talking about how comfortable the seats are. Have you been in one yet? They say much improved over the first Gen, if this reigns true it will be a great road tripper.

 

Lots more extras, ha. Go ahead and say well for the MSPR price of a Colorado I can buy an equally equipped last model year (IE 2014) Silverado for about the same price with huge discounts. Ya great for you, it won't have tons more features, it will be worse on gas and all around costs. Unless you actually are needing to use the full size capabilities that a Mid size can't handle then why? Sure on the Highcountry/Denali there are some stuff (digital dash, MRC shocks, Cooled seats and dual zone ac, oh and sunroof and power sliding rear window. Anything else major I am missing?) but you don't have that trim to compare so why, and you can't get one of those down to the level of a MSRP let alone discounted midsize truck, so why bring up that point?

 

Don't forget there aren't even any rebates out yet and members are already getting around 2-3k off these trucks. No one pays retail. But want to compare retail prices? Loaded LT with leather, 4x4 CC Colorado, std wheels, bose, trailering and no added accessories, 37k. Similarly equipped silverado (LT with leather, 4x4 CC, std wheels, bose no safety package or even bucket option) 46k. An LTZ starts at 46k. Loaded Silverado, somewhere north of 50-55k. It does have some more features, but I am not going to go feature for feature. It will be an easy 10k less. Sure you can save 10k on that silverado to get it down near the msrp of the colorado, then you can get the colorado down even further.

 

Nice pointless argument though!

 

Tyler

Posted

 

How about some more clarification rather than a grade school ramble?

 

No legroom? Where? Front? Back? The old Gen 1 Colorado's had tons of front leg room for tall people (ask me how I know at 6'5) and this gen keeps the same amount. Back seat gained 3 inches over the gen 1 and has 2 more than the Tacoma I believe and maybe more than a extended cab silverado? If not a more relaxed seating position for sure.

 

So far all the reviews are talking about how comfortable the seats are. Have you been in one yet? They say much improved over the first Gen, if this reigns true it will be a great road tripper.

 

Lots more extras, ha. Go ahead and say well for the MSPR price of a Colorado I can buy an equally equipped last model year (IE 2014) Silverado for about the same price with huge discounts. Ya great for you, it won't have tons more features, it will be worse on gas and all around costs. Unless you actually are needing to use the full size capabilities that a Mid size can't handle then why? Sure on the Highcountry/Denali there are some stuff (digital dash, MRC shocks, Cooled seats and dual zone ac, oh and sunroof and power sliding rear window. Anything else major I am missing?) but you don't have that trim to compare so why, and you can't get one of those down to the level of a MSRP let alone discounted midsize truck, so why bring up that point?

 

Don't forget there aren't even any rebates out yet and members are already getting around 2-3k off these trucks. No one pays retail. But want to compare retail prices? Loaded LT with leather, 4x4 CC Colorado, std wheels, bose, trailering and no added accessories, 37k. Similarly equipped silverado (LT with leather, 4x4 CC, std wheels, bose no safety package or even bucket option) 46k. An LTZ starts at 46k. Loaded Silverado, somewhere north of 50-55k. It does have some more features, but I am not going to go feature for feature. It will be an easy 10k less. Sure you can save 10k on that silverado to get it down near the msrp of the colorado, then you can get the colorado down even further.

 

Nice pointless argument though!

 

Tyler

Amxguy's bull$hit tolerance is near zero, remind me to never argue lol

Posted

How about some more clarification rather than a grade school ramble?

 

No legroom? Where? Front? Back? The old Gen 1 Colorado's had tons of front leg room for tall people (ask me how I know at 6'5) and this gen keeps the same amount. Back seat gained 3 inches over the gen 1 and has 2 more than the Tacoma I believe and maybe more than a extended cab silverado? If not a more relaxed seating position for sure.

 

So far all the reviews are talking about how comfortable the seats are. Have you been in one yet? They say much improved over the first Gen, if this reigns true it will be a great road tripper.

 

Lots more extras, ha. Go ahead and say well for the MSPR price of a Colorado I can buy an equally equipped last model year (IE 2014) Silverado for about the same price with huge discounts. Ya great for you, it won't have tons more features, it will be worse on gas and all around costs. Unless you actually are needing to use the full size capabilities that a Mid size can't handle then why? Sure on the Highcountry/Denali there are some stuff (digital dash, MRC shocks, Cooled seats and dual zone ac, oh and sunroof and power sliding rear window. Anything else major I am missing?) but you don't have that trim to compare so why, and you can't get one of those down to the level of a MSRP let alone discounted midsize truck, so why bring up that point?

 

Don't forget there aren't even any rebates out yet and members are already getting around 2-3k off these trucks. No one pays retail. But want to compare retail prices? Loaded LT with leather, 4x4 CC Colorado, std wheels, bose, trailering and no added accessories, 37k. Similarly equipped silverado (LT with leather, 4x4 CC, std wheels, bose no safety package or even bucket option) 46k. An LTZ starts at 46k. Loaded Silverado, somewhere north of 50-55k. It does have some more features, but I am not going to go feature for feature. It will be an easy 10k less. Sure you can save 10k on that silverado to get it down near the msrp of the colorado, then you can get the colorado down even further.

 

Nice pointless argument though!

 

Tyler

This is a great reply to all the misinformed arguments against a resurgence of the small pickup segment. Very well put.

I hope we see more innovation in this segment cause I'm tempted to make the move when I buy my next truck in a few years.

Posted

I still think the front end looks like a crossover, but maybe it will grow on me. I like how GM made the Canyon look like a smaller Sierra so I don't know why they didn't make the Colorado look like a small Silverado and went 2 completely different directions with them.

I think GM was smart to have one that looks more truck for those who want it and the other taking a more "euro" look for those that want it. I'm really hoping this all gets ford to bring back the ranger which also has the lines like the Colorado does.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

This is a great reply to all the misinformed arguments against a resurgence of the small pickup segment. Very well put.

I hope we see more innovation in this segment cause I'm tempted to make the move when I buy my next truck in a few years.

 

I set the driver seat up in a Colorado crew where I would sit in it (5ft 10) and then hopped in back. I was more than comfortable in the back seat. On paper, they show as being the same if slightly roomier than a Silverado double cab but, it feels way more open and less constricted than a Silverado inside. Felt more roomy, airy. Obviously its not 1/2 ton crew cab, but its quite good.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I wonder what the price is out at the coast, Big Sur or other out of the way locations as I bet they are charging quite a premium over the in land pumps. 
    • Were you looking at the HD trucks on the GM website or the half tons as that makes all the difference. As far as I know there are only two options for the HD trucks and that is the standard 2 speed transfer case or the 2 speed transfer case that has the added 4 high auto feature and they put that transfer case by default into the LTZ and High Country although its optional in the LT and not sure if its available in the work trucks.    The half tons, that is where its been a total mess in my estimation for a few years now with most trucks below the top trim having the single speed transfer case as standard but with the option of having the two speed such as one would get by choosing the Z71 package, however then not being able to get the two speed transfer case with the towing package unless it was a higher trim truck AND had the 6.2 gas so one could combine the towing package gearing diffs with the two speed transfer case. Having said that if its a trail boss package then it gets the two speed transfer case but not necessarily able to get the tow package as it would depend on trim level and engine chosen. Believe me, people have bought the GM half tons assuming "of course it will have a two speed transfer case" only to find out after when they really pay attention to what they now own .... crap, there is NO low range !.    I don't believe Ford or Ram have gone that way yet with their half tons but like I say its been a few years now that GM has done this with the half tons. 
    • $5.19 for regular...
    • My office is slowly filling with Blazer parts. Getting ready to do the big bang of repairs. Intake (second time), water pump, radiator, hoses, and I'm going to re-seal the timing cover where someone went hog wild with silicone. Might as well, because I don't think that's done right.   There's a local tow yard that I didn't realize also has quite the inventory of junk vehicles. This is an old school junkyard. No waivers. Cash only, you were never here if anyone asks. Don't piss off the owner, or you'll end up in the back of one of those cars, headed for the shredder. And if you see something, don't snitch. Cars stacked double high, wasps nests, trip hazards and junk everywhere. I found a few little odds/ends for my Blazer. The $20 I spent was worth the experience alone. But I was never there. What yard?   I officially love/hate this truck. It's so out of my wheelhouse, roughest vehicle I've ever owned. Every. single. repair. -is so hard-fought, everything that can go wrong, goes wrong. Currently in a hate phase, and kind of wish I was closer to sending it down the road with a lucky new owner, to be honest. Preparing for the day when I tear into this thing...lots of pre-funk with Ibuprofen.   Rock Auto sent me a bad reman rear wiper motor. It was a bear to install. The tailgate in these things has about eleventy-billion fastners and pieces and things that need to be uninstalled/moved just to access the shoddy rear wiper motor. The casing on mine was cracked clean through, btw. Nice, GM, nice. SO I got this new motor installed, hit the switch, I see it wig-wag (without the arm installed) and think I'm golden. Reassemble everything. With the wiper arm installed I gave it one final test. Time to clean up and take the other half out to dinner, collect a paycheck, right?   Nope. I hear the plastic worm gear stripping as the arm hung up. Just like my broken motor. Weak/old and shredding itself internally. I can assist the arm and the range of motion is normal, and it parks correctly. It just doesn't have the poop to actually sweep the arm with a blade on it. Oh, hell. Turned the key off and shut the shop door behind me. I get to do that over again, too.
    • A complete delete is the most thorough mechanical solution, but it is also major engine work. On a quiet truck that is still under extended warranty, opening the engine purely as prevention is difficult to justify. A plug-in disabler stops commanded cylinder deactivation, but it does not remove or repair the collapsible lifters, so it should not be treated as failure insurance. I would keep the oil full, document the maintenance, and have any persistent tick, misfire, or loss of power diagnosed promptly. If the engine eventually has to come apart, that is the logical time to compare an OEM-style repair with a complete delete. The right choice depends on the truck’s symptoms, warranty status, expected ownership period, and whether the engine already needs to be opened. We explain that decision in more detail here—full disclosure, this is our own guide: https://www.bluev8.com/blogs/news/do-you-actually-need-an-afm-disabler   One exception: some 2021 L82/L84 trucks have RPO YK9, meaning cylinder deactivation was already disabled in the factory ECM; on those trucks a plug-in disabler is redundant, although the AFM/DFM hardware remains inside the engine.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...