Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I picked up some 285/70-17's over the weekend. I have the Bilstein 5100 adjustables set on the highest setting with weather tech mudflaps and no rubbing so far even in reverse at full lock. I'm very happy with the tires and love the ride! I can definitely feel the extra weight of the tires but it does not bother me.

I'll have to take better pictures!

 

That's the same size as a 285/65r18. How much room do you have around the tire at full lock, especially next to the swaybar? I'm wanting to run the 305/65r18 KO2a on stockers, but have only found one truck like that, and he had KOs, not KO2s.

 

Visually, how do you like the width of the 285? Is it enough to make it look oversized over stock?

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the 285s look great on stock wheels, definitely noticeably wider than stock. I got mine on today, sorry for the poor pic.

 

0108161900_zpstchzqu5m.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I think the 285s look great on stock wheels, definitely noticeably wider than stock. I got mine on today, sorry for the poor pic.

Since they come with the crappiest street tire possible (GY SRAs...really?), it doesn't take much for an improvement.

 

What's your real world tread width on them...about 9" or so? Looking at the rear of the tire, there seems to be an inch or more of room when going straight. Swaybar clearance measurement at full lock?

Posted

 

That's the same size as a 285/65r18. How much room do you have around the tire at full lock, especially next to the swaybar? I'm wanting to run the 305/65r18 KO2a on stockers, but have only found one truck like that, and he had KOs, not KO2s.

 

Visually, how do you like the width of the 285? Is it enough to make it look oversized over stock?

There is plenty of room before it hits the sway bar at full lock.18100580-BC02-4836-B74B-294FBCBB393C.jpg

 

I have clearance around all of the wheel well liner and weathertech mudflaps at full lock as well.

BA92468A-5E8A-41E4-8C34-F288E99F2D5D.jpg

 

As for how I like the width visually of the 285 I love it over the stock tires and could not be happier!!! I actually really did not like my stock 17" wheels but with these tires on them I love em! To me I think it looks perfect on the stock 17" wheel with the belstein leveling set at the highest setting.

 

On the 17" stock wheel the 285/70-17 width is aboot 9-7/16" on a measuring tape.

 

That being said for me personally I will be buying 275/70-17 next time as I have noticed that the extra weight and width of the 285's has decreased my "performance" more than I would have liked. For me a 305 will not happen unless I go crazy and do engine performance mods. I have barley driven any highway miles on them yet, maybe 200 miles but a lot of around town driving. The mpg's is lower then I expected for sure but this is subjective to each person.

383AE4F7-9E94-4393-B233-606E1E89AC83.jpg

C1A57F4E-25C6-48BD-9346-5EC42F3594EA.jpg

6F31CF2C-FA48-4AFF-BE40-3C007DB3CEE4.jpg

A9394C32-18B9-47CE-8A62-717FC077BFFA.jpg

Posted

Thanks for the info. That will help a lot of folks on here that are running stockers and want a beefier tire. Looks like your swaybar was rubbed by something....it was shiny!

 

These trucks have tons of power over previous generations. At 340hp, that's more than enough to move a 12x33 tire and the 4-way disc brakes will stop it easily--just seems sluggish compared to the GY donuts that were on it stock. I get a new truck every 8 years or so and am amazed at the hp and MPG increase over the last class of trucks. And the transmissions are matched better too.

 

My truck is leveled with 31x9 on it...one size over stock. With 14K miles on it, my average is 15.5mpg. When I upsize to 285 or 305, I expect that to drop to 13 or so.

Posted

0109161441_zpsvy3kwtph.jpg

 

Remember that your mileage is off just a bit with oversized tires if not reprogrammed for the change. My truck said it averaged 18.5 (30/70 city/hwy) on my 40mi trip home from the tire shop.

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the info. That will help a lot of folks on here that are running stockers and want a beefier tire. Looks like your swaybar was rubbed by something....it was shiny!

 

These trucks have tons of power over previous generations. At 340hp, that's more than enough to move a 12x33 tire and the 4-way disc brakes will stop it easily--just seems sluggish compared to the GY donuts that were on it stock. I get a new truck every 8 years or so and am amazed at the hp and MPG increase over the last class of trucks. And the transmissions are matched better too.

 

My truck is leveled with 31x9 on it...one size over stock. With 14K miles on it, my average is 15.5mpg. When I upsize to 285 or 305, I expect that to drop to 13 or so.

Your very welcome! The sawbar is shiny there from my hand rubbing the dirt off it when I installed the belsteins ;) I think 305's would look killer on here but would most likely need more than a 2" level. The photo of the sway bar has the tire at full lock and there is more than a few inches of clearence from the sway bar, but I'm pretty sure a 305 would rub the wheel well liners or even the fenders with out a kid or body lift. I definitely want to get calibrate the truck for the tires and see if there is much of a difference. Edited by Alexantics
Posted

0109161441_zpsvy3kwtph.jpg

 

Remember that your mileage is off just a bit with oversized tires if not reprogrammed for the change. My truck said it averaged 18.5 (30/70 city/hwy) on my 40mi trip home from the tire shop.

Nice truck! Love the reg cab.

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Any issues those are one of the two I was looking at. Either 275/65/20s or the 285/65/20s id like to go with the 285s being they would be a little wider but not as wide as the 33-12.5s. What are your thoughts about fitting since you have the 275/65/20s? Will there be enough room? Think the 275s are 34.1 and 10.5 wide and the 285s are 34.5 and 11.2 wide.

I had to trim a tiny bit off my gator back mudflaps. There was a bit of rubbing at full lock. And I did zip tie that carpet crap back. Gained another inch there. I was gonna go with the 285/60-20 in a duratrac but they were much more expensive than the ko2's.
Posted

There is plenty of room before it hits the sway bar at full lock.18100580-BC02-4836-B74B-294FBCBB393C.jpg

I have clearance around all of the wheel well liner and weathertech mudflaps at full lock as well.BA92468A-5E8A-41E4-8C34-F288E99F2D5D.jpg

As for how I like the width visually of the 285 I love it over the stock tires and could not be happier!!! I actually really did not like my stock 17" wheels but with these tires on them I love em! To me I think it looks perfect on the stock 17" wheel with the belstein leveling set at the highest setting.

On the 17" stock wheel the 285/70-17 width is aboot 9-7/16" on a measuring tape.

That being said for me personally I will be buying 275/70-17 next time as I have noticed that the extra weight and width of the 285's has decreased my "performance" more than I would have liked. For me a 305 will not happen unless I go crazy and do engine performance mods. I have barley driven any highway miles on them yet, maybe 200 miles but a lot of around town driving. The mpg's is lower then I expected for sure but this is subjective to each person. 383AE4F7-9E94-4393-B233-606E1E89AC83.jpgC1A57F4E-25C6-48BD-9346-5EC42F3594EA.jpg6F31CF2C-FA48-4AFF-BE40-3C007DB3CEE4.jpgA9394C32-18B9-47CE-8A62-717FC077BFFA.jpg

Have any pics from the side?

Posted

I was just looking at tire rack and it seems the 275/60 is 15lbs more than the stock LS2s, and the 275/65 is 17lbs more (2lbs more than 275/60). I would have expected it to weigh more than that. I wonder if there is a bigger MPG hit going 275/65 vs 275/60. If anything, the bigger diameter would probably be the culprit of worse MPG.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...