Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

See attached pics from this morning, light was a bit dim, but you can clearly tell the difference from stock stance. Unfortunately was too dark when I dropped it off for the install I forgot to take a good "before" shot, I may be able to find a decent one someplace. I definitely will remove the lower valence - I think it will complete the look, and I'm going to have the shop flip the rears so their in the correct position, although to be honest I noticed nothing weird in the ride - its just way better than stock!!

 

I would like opinions for when I add 286/65/20 BFG KO2's - and they will be the primary tire 9 months of the year - would you mount them on the black granite alloy wheels in these pics or the stock All terrain 20"s? ON the one hand the stock AT rims are "nicer" in terms of finish & quality I think, and IMO are one of the best looking wheels GM has ever made. On the other hand I'm fairly certain the granite alloy wheels are a good amount lighter than the stock AT's - I always notice the winter tire setup is easier to move around though I've never weighed them. It would be nice to offset some of the weight gain from the beefier BFG's by mounting them on a lighter wheel - on the other hand I still like the look of the stock AT's, they have a better finish/clear coat, and are by default more valuable so the option of taking them off in the winter is nice too.

EDIT - forgot to mention, my measured height difference from top of front tire to bottom of wheel well/fender liner in front was a hair over 2" - like 2.1...so I dunno if there is "settling" that will occur, or if the shop inflated my tires more but it was def more than the 1.87" advertised. Not going to complain on that one.

Great additions. It looks great. In my pasy (and on a current truck of mine, 2008 sierra z71 1500) I did the same thing...almost. I put the 5100 series all the way around and have never looked back. I like the shocks and height in the front is great....ride is fine. Although I didn't do the rear block kit . When I did this to the 2008.....it had several miles so the decision of putting all 4 shocks on was easy. So fast forward. On a 2016 I'm going to do the rear block which will give me 1" lift in back and I was going to replace the front shocks almost immediately so I can bring the front end up with the bilstein 5100 ride height adjustables. So, my question is......should I bother with replacing the rear shocks to since I'm going to be installing a firestone air bag system as well? It's just that the rancho shocks are brand frigin new, you know? And I do understand the purpose of the shocks and airbags are different.....I'm just curious if I keep the stock rears since my ride should be improved a bit from the air bag setup anyway. The truck will routinely have a fair bit of payload in it (within the trucks capability) and in the same breath......I want to have a nice stance on it. I know I'm probably starting a debate on stock rancho rear shocks vs rear bilsteins.....but that's ok. Thanks!

Posted

Try it out with stocks first.

If you don't like it, or if they wear out after 20k~ miles like some Rachos do....

Upgrade!

Posted

Great additions. It looks great. In my pasy (and on a current truck of mine, 2008 sierra z71 1500) I did the same thing...almost. I put the 5100 series all the way around and have never looked back. I like the shocks and height in the front is great....ride is fine. Although I didn't do the rear block kit . When I did this to the 2008.....it had several miles so the decision of putting all 4 shocks on was easy. So fast forward. On a 2016 I'm going to do the rear block which will give me 1" lift in back and I was going to replace the front shocks almost immediately so I can bring the front end up with the bilstein 5100 ride height adjustables. So, my question is......should I bother with replacing the rear shocks to since I'm going to be installing a firestone air bag system as well? It's just that the rancho shocks are brand frigin new, you know? And I do understand the purpose of the shocks and airbags are different.....I'm just curious if I keep the stock rears since my ride should be improved a bit from the air bag setup anyway. The truck will routinely have a fair bit of payload in it (within the trucks capability) and in the same breath......I want to have a nice stance on it. I know I'm probably starting a debate on stock rancho rear shocks vs rear bilsteins.....but that's ok. Thanks!

 

I'd just get the bisltein 5100s for the rear as well- for one, if you plan on adding a 1" taller block setup (2.25") the bilstein shocks are specifically designed to accommodate that extra 1"- they're longer- if you were to add that block to the ranchos it'll effect the ride and damping ability of the shock/shock travel. The other thing is, the stock ranchos get real squirmy on pocked/uneven pavement and make the rear end bounce around and do not feel nearly as controlled as the bilsteins- so the combo of having bilsteins @ max setting in front along w/ crappy ranchos in back compromised in travel w/ the added blocks would probably equate to a strange ride in general. Lastly- the rears are cheaper than the fronts and super easy to install so it's a no-brainer IMO to do all 4.

 

The ranchos may be new, but they're junk. Keep in mind I already had an AT '14 sierra w/ same shocks totaled @ 40k miles, when compared to my new '15 (kept ranchos on for about 5500 miles) the difference in ride was astonishing, the ranchos on the 14 were most likely shot @ 25k to be honest. They do ride "ok" when brand new- but pale in comparison to the bilsteins, the biggest difference I noticed w/ the bilsteins is how much more planted and controlled the truck feels over uneven pavement and when cornering- despite being raised 2" all around it actually handles MUCH better- I would compare the difference in handling to adding bigger sway bars & tighter end links to a car- that's how big a difference it felt. The ranchos have the truck feeling bouncy & cause more body roll in turns.

Posted

Agreed the ranchos are a pavement shock that's pretty much it. Hit a large hole, bump, whoop, or cross a rail road track and it seems like the body is bouncing off the chassis with the ranchos. It's greatly reduced with the bilsteins. As such the ride is a little stiffer when going over cracks and binds in the pavement. But you trade one for the other. I do wish i would've held out for 6112s. Would love to have that huge 60mm shock.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Agreed the ranchos are a pavement shock that's pretty much it. Hit a large hole, bump, whoop, or cross a rail road track and it seems like the body is bouncing off the chassis with the ranchos. It's greatly reduced with the bilsteins. As such the ride is a little stiffer when going over cracks and binds in the pavement. But you trade one for the other. I do wish i would've held out for 6112s. Would love to have that huge 60mm shock.

Thanks for the information. I haven't made a decision yet, but honestly I think the Bilstein 5100 series shock is a pavement shock as well. This is coming directly from Bilstein. I'm sure it's a better shock and I've been super happy with the ones I've put on trucks before, but they'll tell you it's meant to be a direct replacement with very similar ride characteristics. I'm guessing it will hold up better long term, but as far as feeling night/day differences when comparing both shocks (new)....I don't think it will happen.

Posted

I have to disagree. They market them as an off road oriented shock. Just like the 6112s and the ones on the ram rebel.

 

They feel very different to me. Not sure how one could not feel the difference. Granted I have mine at max setting.

 

But I think you'll like them over the ranchos. Bilsteins should come standard on these trucks IMHO.

Posted

I have to disagree. They market them as an off road oriented shock. Just like the 6112s and the ones on the ram rebel.

 

They feel very different to me. Not sure how one could not feel the difference. Granted I have mine at max setting.

 

But I think you'll like them over the ranchos. Bilsteins should come standard on these trucks IMHO.

Good to know. You've got a good point there with the setting now that I think about it. I have had most of the trucks on the 1.25" setting, so I'm not nearly seeing difference most likely. At least for the next vehicle, I will have them at the max setting of 1.85" in the front, so should look good....and perform good. It might be a little bit, but I'll post my thoughts when my comparisons are done! Thanks again.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Can you guys give any height gained numbers per setting? So with 4 settings we know the bottom one gives no lift.



What does the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th setting yield?



Not talking about what Bilstein claims but what you guys with experience got. Like after the truck had time to settle what you actually got lift wise per settling.


Posted

Just ordered these. Will install the rear first.

 

I have a 2.5 inch RC leveling kit on the front of my 14 Silverado and was thinking about putting this on the max setting along with the leveling kit. Anyone done this yet or if that's even possible without changing out the UCA? If it works, I plan on putting a 2 inch block in the rear to level it out.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Like the previous poster, I have a 2.5" Rc kit with 1" in the back. Interested in upgrading to 5100s all around. I don't want to go any taller, would I just replace the ranchos with the 5100s at the stock setting since I have the level already? Or would I need to crank up the bilsteins cause I have a level installed. What would be my best option? Would also be interested in the 6112s but who knows when those are out. Thx

Posted

Don't stack the lifts, we have had people post doing similar and mixed results. Either leave spacer and put on stock setting or pull spacer and use the leveling on the shock.

 

I will pull my spacer for the 6112 when the time comes or 5100 if 6112 doesn't get great reviews.

Posted

Don't stack the lifts, we have had people post doing similar and mixed results. Either leave spacer and put on stock setting or pull spacer and use the leveling on the shock.

 

I will pull my spacer for the 6112 when the time comes or 5100 if 6112 doesn't get great reviews.

Thanks. I think I'll leave the spacer and see how it rides, and can always pull spacer later if needed
  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...