Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Thanks man, Buck Stop, Oregon outfit, got a huge discount for scratches, very big and heavy, but outstanding craftsmanship.

Edited by gearheadesw
  • Like 1
Posted
Thanks man, Buck Stop, Oregon outfit, got a huge discount for scratches, very big and heavy, but outstanding craftsmanship.
Awesome, thanks

Sent from my STH100-1 using Tapatalk

Posted

B572311E-4A95-4C93-A8AC-81F86288D733_zps

 

ED25C72D-F87A-41CC-AD96-0337B0C528A9_zps

 

6DFC011F-6035-49ED-9E81-A3FC4C52DC1D_zps

 

3753A174-61DD-4C14-93D0-68D8CD0786F3_zps

 

15 day road trip for Christmas from Northern Saskatchewan to Nanaimo BC and back.  Got caught in the rockies and had to spend an extra night when the highway was shut down. Hit alot of bad roads and snowy conditions but the truck performed great.  Very impressed with it on the challenging roads.  Fuel mileage was what I expected so I was happy with that too.   

  • Like 2
Posted
On 12/29/2017 at 1:22 PM, jackedupZ71 said:


all of that was already done to it.
they are 295/60’s. if they weren’t brand spanking new i would go 35x12.50


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Was there any trimming done to fit this size on stock rims? Any rubbing?

Posted
Was there any trimming done to fit this size on stock rims? Any rubbing?

no trimming that i have found. the only rubbing i have seen is on the actual frame itself. it isn’t bad though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

Picked up this new 2018 2500HD 4x4 CCLB LTZ with the 6.0 a couple weeks back and am so far enjoying the step up! (Always had half tons before this truck; first HD truck).

 

Pic was taken the first week I had it. Have since added some Husky mud flaps to it as well as some basic essentials like good floor mats and the Husky underseat storage bin. And of course some good winter tires for yanking the sled trailer around up here as well as the Rigid DOT fog light kit. I've got some Iron Cross 'Patriot' running boards on order, but they've been on backorder for about 3 weeks now so I may wind up ordering something else; not sure. 
I'm thinking the next steps will be the spray-in liner and a Truckboss sled deck with a Bedslide. Or I might just pull the box and go with a custom flatbed. Not totally sure yet. This is my first GM product, so I want to give it a couple months at least before dumping too much $$ into it. 


I gotta admit your guys' lifted/leveled trucks look SICK. This truck, especially the CCLB looks GREAT with some aggressive tires and a lift or level. But I probably won't go that route since the truck works good for me stock. But I'll always drool a little at some of your all's trucks..

 

 

 

25443055_10154872879701370_4886561546187642486_n.thumb.jpg.516be60694c185562c651ff11eed0097.jpg

Edited by AKNick
  • Like 2
Posted

well i got this one about 2 months ago now.   wish i had better pictures that were not on the dealership lot but the roads are all snow / ice / salt so this is the only time it has been clean since i got it.

 

i have plans on lifting - removing lower valance, updating the stereo (audomobile evo 10's from my old truck under rear seats, might put in my processor / jl amps etc to...)

 

i was a Dodge guy before this to be honest....  based 100% off the looks...  i like being able to jam bigger tires in round wheel wells....   i actually purchased the 2018 Ram 2500 Power Wagon before this....  returned it the next day....  my fault for not researching and also dodge fault... i was updating my 2015 Ram to pull my 10,000 pound travel trailer / boat etc so i wanted the higher payload... they show me all the specs for a Ram 2500HD which i was told was the same #'s the 2500 Powerwagon had... turns out that is untrue... 1440 payload 9900 pound pulling on the Power Wagon.....  so returned it the next day (did not sign bank papers yet... so they didn't have much of a choice) i was honestly going to order a new Ram 3500 From factory but the dealership was pretty annoying to deal with to begin with (took a full day of negotations on the power wagon....) got sick and tired of going back and forth on #'s i went to GM and took a look.

 

found this 2018 Sierra 3500 SLT leather bose etc,  honestly never drove the new generation Chevy / GM product.... glad i did!  the dealership was easy to deal with... had it sorted out inside of an hour (work discount so was cost +2% so no dickering needed...) gave me a better trade in $ and was surprising how much nicer these are to drive than the Ram's.....   the power wagon was smoother but than again it is a purpose built offroad half ton pretty much... so it better be smooth cause it cant pack crap....

 

i've prolly spent 30+ hrs researching lifts / levels and options for it.... plan to get it done in late spring,  i prefer to have the tires more or less stuffed....  there's a ton of 1 ton lifted gm's around town with 6+ inch lifts and what look like bicycle tires which bum me out... lol    i'm not afraid to cut, and see there is a bumper mod to get me another 1/2 inch on the front bumper i plan on doing!  but realistically i'm no closer to a plan than when i started.... found pics and posts of people who have fit anywhere from 33 to 37's  but it seems it works for one guy and not the next one.....    i am leaning towards the 3.5 inch UCA level  and hoping for 18x9 rims with 295/70 r18's  or go all out depending how broke i want to be... with something like the BDS 4.5 inch lift with 18's 35x12.5         I wish i could find abunch of local trucks with the lift kits so i could see them in person!   Pro Comp 6 inch lift is another option, but some trucks look just great and others there's way to much wheel well for my preference....    

 

GetAttachmentThumbnail?id=AQMkADAwATE0YjkwLWMwZjYtN2VhOS0wMAItMDAKAEYAAANgehMzW9%2BjSYgJNhh5uoHYBwApHA4B6%2BgrRLzUDKSiOfugAAACAQwAAAApHA4B6%2BgrRLzUDKSiOfugAAE0d78vAAAAARIAEAD7DlnA2D%2FWQ5soVx%2FnQsol&thumbnailType=2&X-OWA-CANARY=gfXSAWojbUS8sDuPAJzEORCuKMkoVdUY6m6pykrAHUIQIf6St5sllvOH3lMKo-o68YQDdGHDBJ0.&token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsIng1dCI6ImVuaDlCSnJWUFU1aWpWMXFqWmpWLWZMMmJjbyJ9.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.ezJWP5uC7SJ3zT9lL_JRlanKlHpAlmBsZgP_U3dVs-2IU1fOBDJ8-aivMcPmBHHxxw16_Vm3yKNR_ZKDTcDLhOTUT6wRrc3bUGZ3jEp1Ed3-d34T50dTHVznhD9IW46mcCuBcvGV0VjTNntcZlCVx2vhLk-2YhYJsclF0UXLTJ4IX168Nb23ZU80RsgG2MYQlZw5DLHm27k8cZBzigQV-9HRZlpqEF3VDmlVvtf1ww9xpiB-5XrKU9Qfx4ZcSPqK3Esu8xnX0b8H6DltuvA8jRAYmah2n4pUtVBEhBKf8Zjt8aaTjAgH3yHaidJnZfgdMPaML6I-KrDSrANPlHB0MA&owa=outlook.live.com&isc=1

Posted

Your picture didn't work,

I really wanted a Power Wagon but I want to haul a sled deck and It would have been way over the payload so I never pulled the trigger.  I was pretty disappointed when I found out the payload ratings on a 3/4 ton truck was less than an F150 lol .  

I'm glad I went with the Chevy.  Its been a great truck so far....    

Posted
1 hour ago, Bhurt said:

Your picture didn't work,

I really wanted a Power Wagon but I want to haul a sled deck and It would have been way over the payload so I never pulled the trigger.  I was pretty disappointed when I found out the payload ratings on a 3/4 ton truck was less than an F150 lol .  

I'm glad I went with the Chevy.  Its been a great truck so far....    

the exact reason i returned the Power Wagon....  i wanted a sled deck for it and it cannot carry one... truck cannot do airbags either even if i wanted to try to do it...   not sure why my pic is not working ....  but picture a completely stock 3500 Slate Grey Mettalic 2018 hah...   after i got 34 Litres per hundred pulling my newly used travel trailer a couple months ago back home (bought it about 9 hours away... winter time so good deal!) i wanted a more purpose built truck... the 5.7 Hemi was just amazingly bad on fuel ...  i could barely make it between some towns...  i went through the Icefields and was getting pretty damn nervous when my old ram said i had 160km of fuel left.... and i had to drive 150km to the next gas station... 

 

i know the 6.0L chevy is not exactly a Prius... but bigger tank and bullet proof from everything i have read about it, and built to work, it pulls my sled trailer with better mileage than my 5.7 hemi so far... (although day to day mileage is worse but comparing apples to oranges 1/2 to 1 ton so cant blame it ) only have about 1200km on it so far...  but it's been nice so far!.   I couldn't justify the diesel...  i have a company truck for work, so the new 3500 goes out once a week on average really....  and my dry weight of my travel trailer is 6600  gross of 10k   will never pull a bigger trailer and i hear about longterm issues with diesel's when it comes to warming up in the winter and short trips (unless i'm camping or sledding the truck just goes to the grocery store just to get it moving sometimes.... Me and the wife usually drive her Jeep as more town friendly.

 

can't wait to actually get it out this spring with the Travel Trailer though.....  if i can get 500km out of a tank of gas i will be happy......  (the ram went low fuel at 300km so 350 max...) 

Posted
7 hours ago, Aron said:

the exact reason i returned the Power Wagon....  i wanted a sled deck for it and it cannot carry one... truck cannot do airbags either even if i wanted to try to do it...   not sure why my pic is not working ....  but picture a completely stock 3500 Slate Grey Mettalic 2018 hah...   after i got 34 Litres per hundred pulling my newly used travel trailer a couple months ago back home (bought it about 9 hours away... winter time so good deal!) i wanted a more purpose built truck... the 5.7 Hemi was just amazingly bad on fuel ...  i could barely make it between some towns...  i went through the Icefields and was getting pretty damn nervous when my old ram said i had 160km of fuel left.... and i had to drive 150km to the next gas station... 

 

i know the 6.0L chevy is not exactly a Prius... but bigger tank and bullet proof from everything i have read about it, and built to work, it pulls my sled trailer with better mileage than my 5.7 hemi so far... (although day to day mileage is worse but comparing apples to oranges 1/2 to 1 ton so cant blame it ) only have about 1200km on it so far...  but it's been nice so far!.   I couldn't justify the diesel...  i have a company truck for work, so the new 3500 goes out once a week on average really....  and my dry weight of my travel trailer is 6600  gross of 10k   will never pull a bigger trailer and i hear about longterm issues with diesel's when it comes to warming up in the winter and short trips (unless i'm camping or sledding the truck just goes to the grocery store just to get it moving sometimes.... Me and the wife usually drive her Jeep as more town friendly.

 

can't wait to actually get it out this spring with the Travel Trailer though.....  if i can get 500km out of a tank of gas i will be happy......  (the ram went low fuel at 300km so 350 max...) 

I've got 12000 kms in 3 month on my truck so far.  We have been using it for the family trips and I use it for my daily driver.  Living up in cold saskatchewan I decided I had enough of my Cummins and always having to plug in when it was cold out or set the command start to run every 2 hours if there was no place to plug in so I decided to go with the gas.  So far I have found fuel mileage is affected by how fast I drive, I have the 4:10 rear end so mileage is much better at 90-100kms an hour but I generally run the 110-120 mark.  Haven't really pulled anything big with it yet though... The test will come in the spring when I have to haul the boat to the lake.  Its a 23' Tritoon and pulls like a big sheet of plywood in the wind lol.  

Posted (edited)

Coming along !

2500hd 4x4.jpg

3.5 lift 29565r20 xd825 wheel.jpg

Edited by Catman HD
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...