Jump to content

Looking to regear? Then look here!


Recommended Posts

Posted

I know I've been looking for gears for the 12 bolt 9.5" 14+ rear ends and no one seems to have them! So I emailed Yukon gear to see if they're working on a solution. Turns out, they already have one!

 

Here's what Paul "Blue" Tipton told me (he is a very nice and informative gentleman who answered all my questions I threw at him; A++ in my book!):

 

The 97-13 14 bolt 9.5" ring will work in our rear housings! Only bad part is, you have to buy the 14 bolt carrier and a new yoke for it to work as well as outsource the pinion seal for it (he said he would give me the part # at time of my order).

 

This makes me want to lift my truck sooner than later now! Hope this helps for those other guys who can't stand a laggy lifted truck with lesser towing capabilities. The added cost of a new carrier and yoke are totally worth it in my book.

 

Guess I gotta start saving for a lift kit, wheels and tires, and gears all the way around. Thinking 4.56 for a bit more pep around town.

 

For those with 3.42's currently and 35's on your truck, if you're looking for stock performance, go with a 4.10 gear. For those with 3.08 gears currently, if you're looking for stock performance go with 3.73's or 3.42's (my vote is for a steeper gear IMO)

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Between the new carrier, gearset, yoke, and any type of bearings/ kits, it would be around $1000 just in parts just for the rear. Kinda pricey but IMO it's worth the coin

Posted

I want 3.73 but will settle for 3.42. I hope someone will come out with just the ring and pinion 3.73 for the 9.5" 12 bolt. I know right now there's 3.42 and 4.10. Maybe you can't make 3.73 work with the size of the gears. I want to be able to just swap out the ring and pinions without having to get a new carrier.

Posted

I had to get new carriers on mine. Pretty common actually.

Yeah I did too on my 02. Got a Grizzly locker in the rear with 4.88's

I want 3.73 but will settle for 3.42. I hope someone will come out with just the ring and pinion 3.73 for the 9.5" 12 bolt. I know right now there's 3.42 and 4.10. Maybe you can't make 3.73 work with the size of the gears. I want to be able to just swap out the ring and pinions without having to get a new carrier.

Go factory GM for either of those. It will be a direct swap. If i kept my truck stock it would get 3.73's. But since I want to lift it sometime in the future I'll hold out until I can afford the lift, wheels and tires, and probably 4.56 gears (on 35's)
Posted

Go factory GM for either of those. It will be a direct swap. If i kept my truck stock it would get 3.73's. But since I want to lift it sometime in the future I'll hold out until I can afford the lift, wheels and tires, and probably 4.56 gears (on 35's)

 

The stock 3.73 gears are 9.76 12 bolt, not 9.5 and what I've read on here is that you'd have to do a whole axle swap if you go all GM diff.

 

I don't plan on even leveling the truck, but I'm used to 3.73s from my last truck and I want the extra pulling power. It's more or less embarrassing that my '14 with 3.08s tows less than my 98 with 3.73s. That's why I'd settle for 3.42s because that would go from 6,600 to about 9,500 lbs. I don't even plan on buying any kind of trailer, but I mean pulling power for emergency type situations to help someone. Plus it was also embarrassing that a few weeks ago I helped my best friend move furniture and all I had was a love seat and with the 3.08s I actually felt it. It took a lot more weight for me to feel it in the bed with my old truck.

Posted

 

The stock 3.73 gears are 9.76 12 bolt, not 9.5 and what I've read on here is that you'd have to do a whole axle swap if you go all GM diff.

 

I don't plan on even leveling the truck, but I'm used to 3.73s from my last truck and I want the extra pulling power. It's more or less embarrassing that my '14 with 3.08s tows less than my 98 with 3.73s. That's why I'd settle for 3.42s because that would go from 6,600 to about 9,500 lbs. I don't even plan on buying any kind of trailer, but I mean pulling power for emergency type situations to help someone. Plus it was also embarrassing that a few weeks ago I helped my best friend move furniture and all I had was a love seat and with the 3.08s I actually felt it. It took a lot more weight for me to feel it in the bed with my old truck.

It doesn't make sense cause when you look at the owners manual for towing capacities, they have the 5.3L with max tow (3.73's) rated as the same as the 6.2 with max tow. Now, from my understanding, the 6.2 is the only motor that is allowed to get the 9.76" axle.

 

And yeah I agree. Another delearship tried to sell me a truck with 3.08's and that was the first thing I looked for when I bought my truck because I tow a 5k pound trailer often and with those gears it'd be a struggle. Now, the High country models come standard with the 3.42's which is another reason it sold me on it (that and the brown interior).

 

Another thing I have a problem is with their grizzly locker. In my other truck it's always trying to lock both tires even in turns so that causes one tire to always slip and chirp. For a stock truck, the stock posi is perfect IMO

Posted

AAM makes the current 9.5". here's a link to what's available. http://www.demandaam.com/axle-results?vm=GM&q=9.5%22+12+Bolt+-+Rear+Axle. Basically comes down to this, if running factory 3.08. you'll need a new carrier. If running factory 3.42, swap to 4.10 is a drop in. If using a Yukon gear set for the 9.5" 14 bolt, although this will bolt up to the stock carrier, deck height requirement on the carriers are off enough to either involve shimming the carrier off-center and dealing with it at the caliper mounts or getting a new carrier. Pinion seal is different as is the yoke diameter requiring a new 1415 yoke.

Posted

It doesn't make sense cause when you look at the owners manual for towing capacities, they have the 5.3L with max tow (3.73's) rated as the same as the 6.2 with max tow. Now, from my understanding, the 6.2 is the only motor that is allowed to get the 9.76" axle.

 

And yeah I agree. Another delearship tried to sell me a truck with 3.08's and that was the first thing I looked for when I bought my truck because I tow a 5k pound trailer often and with those gears it'd be a struggle. Now, the High country models come standard with the 3.42's which is another reason it sold me on it (that and the brown interior).

 

Another thing I have a problem is with their grizzly locker. In my other truck it's always trying to lock both tires even in turns so that causes one tire to always slip and chirp. For a stock truck, the stock posi is perfect IMO

 

Ya I know I've read 5.3 comes with 9.5" and 6.2 comes with 9.76 no matter the gear ratio. So if you have a 6.2 with 3.42s then GM 3.73s are easy ring and pinion change. I just haven't seen 5.3 with the max tow. Maybe you saw that the 5.3 is the standard (which it is for the upper trims) and has the optional 6.2 with the max tow. I don't think you can get max tow with the 5.3. Maybe I'm wrong, just going by everything I've read on here.

Posted

5.3 max tow comes 3.73 and I'd think the larger 9.76 to deal with the loads but I don't know directly.

Posted

Im lost when it comes to gears, and sucks even more that i have 2 gears, a front and a rear, I'm lifted 12' with 35" tires, i pull my 16' low boy trailer with a polaris RZR 800 on it, why would changing gears help, and want that hurt that gas milage, im already getting 10-13 MPG as it is, depending on the wind ect

Posted

Your motor rpm and wheel rpm don't match because there are six different gears in your tranny that then go through you axle reduction before spinning the tires. Stock your tires rotate 652 revolutions per mile, but now your large tires go further per revolution. So your truck drives like it doesn't have first gear and is starting in second. Think of riding a ten speed in low and high. If you put a taller gear in your axle the motor could again spin the same rpm at the same speed and rotate your large tires slower. This could increase your mpg or hurt it, but there is a better change it would help with the bigger wheels, but it certainly would increase how fast it accelerates.

 

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/gears.htm

Posted

Im lost when it comes to gears, and sucks even more that i have 2 gears, a front and a rear, I'm lifted 12' with 35" tires, i pull my 16' low boy trailer with a polaris RZR 800 on it, why would changing gears help, and want that hurt that gas milage, im already getting 10-13 MPG as it is, depending on the wind ect

Change in RPM per gear= towing less weight. Think about trucks with 3.08 gears that tow max 5800 pounds and then you have a truck with 3.42's and they can tow 9300 pounds. It's literally all in the gearing. For 35's go with and least a 4.10 for factory RPM's but if you want to counter the added weight then go 4.56's

 

Makes the truck snappy as hell too. My 02 lifted on 35's with 4.88's will basically outrun my 14 both with stock 5.3L motors

 

Less wear and tear on the tranny too. Not trying to spin at a lower rpm than need be so it's not lugging. It's worth the coin to get regeared, I can guarantee you that

Posted

So.. from reading all this, can someone with 3.08s do a direct swap to 3.42 from the 9.5" rear? Like if someone lifted were taking theirs out we could buy em used?

 

I had originally hoped to go 3.73 too but from what I understand here I have the wrong diffs for that.. and I'm NOT swapping axles on my truck.

 

5300 pound towing capacity is unacceptable. My classic plus trailer would probably be more than that. I'm gonna have to make this a priority. Right now in traffic I pull 3500-4000 rpm in 1st 2nd and sometimes 3rd trying to keep up with the cars around me. The engine sounds great but I think it hurts my fuel econ and wears on my engine more than it should have to.

 

I don't plan to lift, level, or run oversized tires on mine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 509 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...