Jump to content

Trade wheels


Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone else trade their factory set up for something else? Currently this guy wants to trade me his 18" XD Rockstar wheels with 285/65R/18 Nitto trail grapplers for my 20" Texas Edition wheels with stock 275/55R/20 continental tires. He has a 2012 Z71 and said he would also give me his suspension because he was going to build the engine and lower it. What would you do?

Posted

Keep your stock wheels, rockstars were played out before they got popular. What need do you have for his suspension? Your's is better.

Posted

Modify the way you like it. Who cares what others think.

 

Don't get the Rockstars!

Posted

Why would you trade 20" wheels for 18" wheels? That's downgrading to me.

 

You can do better on your stock wheels. I say order some 275/65/20's for your stock wheels and a level kit for your truck.

 

275/65/20 (34.1") is bigger than 285/65/18 (32.6)

 

6bbca516f45cb4f7674dd96464dd2f94.jpg

 

You technically don't need anything done to run 285/65/18. They are basically the same size of your stock 275/55/20.

 

dd85ccd402e2a697af7732f41050c909.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Posted

Not everyone wants to go to a 34" tire, that will hurt mileage and throw your speedo off a good amount. Not to mention even with a 2.5" level there's probably some cutting or zip tying to be done to avoid rubbing.

Posted

Not everyone wants to go to a 34" tire, that will hurt mileage and throw your speedo off a good amount. Not to mention even with a 2.5" level there's probably some cutting or zip tying to be done to avoid rubbing.

I understand not everyone wants to run the same tire size. I'm just stating facts, and let the op decide.

 

And yes, with my set-up, I lost 1.5 mpg but no trimming or zip tying of anything to prevent rubbing. A wider tire would cause rubbing, that's why I went with stock width, 275

Posted

I understand not everyone wants to ruin the same tire size. I'm just stating facts, and let the op decide.

 

And yes, with my set-up, I lost 1.5 mpg but no trimming or zip tying of anything to prevent rubbing. A wider tire would cause rubbing, that's why I went with stock width, 275

cant lie, that 34" diameter sure fills the wheel wells nicely. I don't think I could go any less than 305 though. A 305 with a 34" diameter would definitely rub, my 32.8" 305's rubbed the liners and I had to zip tie them back.

Posted

cant lie, that 34" diameter sure fills the wheel wells nicely. I don't think I could go any less than 305 though. A 305 with a 34" diameter would definitely rub, my 32.8" 305's rubbed the liners and I had to zip tie them back.

I looked at 305's, but with out a zero offset to negative offset aftermarket wheel, they would Def rub. I think anything negative would be great for a 305-325 series

Posted

depends on if you like the set up. I personally don't like the rockstar wheels because of looks but also yes they are played out. I see about 10 trucks with them almost everyday. while I don't have very unique wheels I have not seen them on any truck in my area.

 

if you like the set up get them, but look at how much tread the tires have and also if the tires have unusual wear i.e. shocks are too weak for the heavy tire / wheel assembly which is usually the prob when people put aftermarket wheels with mud terrain tires on a truck. the tires get all chopped out and they ride like your on a washboard road all the time.

Posted

Like others mentioned the rockstars are old and everyones got them. If thats what you want thats cool but I would recommend getting the 18" all terrains that came on the AT Sierras. They look really good on the silverados. Add a slightly larger tire and your set. I plan on getting me a set of OEMs or clones when I wear out the tread on my stock 20"s.

Posted

Like others mentioned the rockstars are old and everyones got them. If thats what you want thats cool but I would recommend getting the 18" all terrains that came on the AT Sierras. They look really good on the silverados. Add a slightly larger tire and your set. I plan on getting me a set of OEMs or clones when I wear out the tread on my stock 20"s.

AT's come with 20's

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...