Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Magstar, do you have a straight on pic of your truck? I'm going to pull the trigger on wheel spacers and fender flares soon and curious how yours look straight on. With the 1.75", you didn't need to trim the studs correct?

Posted (edited)

Magstar, do you have a straight on pic of your truck? I'm going to pull the trigger on wheel spacers and fender flares soon and curious how yours look straight on. With the 1.75", you didn't need to trim the studs correct?

 

post-16956-145386910067_thumb.jpg

 

post-16956-14538691201_thumb.jpg

 

I'll get some true straight on shots tomorrow. I had these on my phone.

 

I did not have to trim my wheel studs. The factory studs stick out 1.75" so to avoid trimming the original studs you'll need the 1.75" spacers, some of the OEM wheels have a pocket on the backside mating surface that will allow you to use 1.50" spacers I've heard but mine didn't have them.

post-16956-145386910067_thumb.jpg

post-16956-14538691201_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145386910067_thumb.jpg

post-16956-14538691201_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145386910067_thumb.jpg

post-16956-14538691201_thumb.jpg

Edited by magstar67
  • Like 1
Posted

Magstar, do you have a straight on pic of your truck? I'm going to pull the trigger on wheel spacers and fender flares soon and curious how yours look straight on. With the 1.75", you didn't need to trim the studs correct?

post-16956-145390770196_thumb.jpg

 

post-16956-145390772711_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145390770196_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145390772711_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145390770196_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145390772711_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145390770196_thumb.jpg

post-16956-145390772711_thumb.jpg

Posted (edited)

BDS 6in lift with BDS rear leaf springs - Fox coil overs lowered 1in- 35x12.5 Mickey ThompsonATZ

Fox coil overs lowered 1 inch

Fab steps installed

 

Edited by Payton34
  • Like 5
Posted

BDS 6in lift with BDS rear leaf springs - Fox coil overs lowered 1in- 35x12.5 Mickey ThompsonATZ

 

 

 

 

That looks (.Y.)s

 

I think the 35s looks small on these 6inch lifts..... Maybe a 36 would sill it iut better?

 

Sent from my Note 4 on Tapashit

Posted

Does anyone think I can do this with stock 22's that came with my 2015 Silverado High Country? The tires are all weather tires that look low pro-ish. I'd love to have bigger tires if possible but didn't know because of the size of the rim. Thanks.

Posted

Does anyone think I can do this with stock 22's that came with my 2015 Silverado High Country? The tires are all weather tires that look low pro-ish. I'd love to have bigger tires if possible but didn't know because of the size of the rim. Thanks.

You can use the 22" rim with a 35x12.5 R 22 if you install a suspension lift (eg. 6" lift kit). Would just be a lower profile tire than what I run on my 20"s. Bigger the rim the more those jokers are gonna cost, but I'm sure you already know that. I say hurry up and get it all installed so we can see pics!

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

attachicon.gif20160208_144945-1.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk

 

What size lift? Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...