Jump to content

2015 Silverado 5.3, engine failure at 482 miles


sjgi48

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well GM should have given you a vehicle to drive regardless. I would go after them for the rental money.

 

This is why they have warranties on them. If an engine has an issue it will fail almost right away. Someone or machine most likely didn't tighten all of the Crank or Piston bolts so they backed off and boom.

 

Friend had an F150 they had to pull off of the carrier because the engine was DOA at the lot.

 

He just refused delivery and had them re-order it.

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Dealer pulled the oil pan off on Tuesday. A bolt (either extra or the self removing type, no one is sure and the remains are only generaly identifiable as a bolt) floating around the bottom end seems to have been the issue. After lying dormant, said bolt got sucked into the works and collided with a bunch of stuff, apparently ruining a few of the big ends of the connecting rods and even breaking a few piston skirts for good measure. No one can believe that the engine kept running at all. Though way down on power, it did run and would even restart , and it was not all that loud. I will say that the failure felt major, anyone who has ever blown an engine will know what I mean, but the truck kept moving long enough to get the half mile, up hill, to where there was somewhere to get off the road.

 

I would not mind having the blown engine, it would make a great coffee table base (like the old British Top Gear set up).

 

It has been interesting, but no fun to have the truck expire before the temp tag. It will get a new engine, but will take two weeks.

Posted

Dealer pulled the oil pan off on Tuesday. A bolt (either extra or the self removing type, no one is sure and the remains are only generaly identifiable as a bolt) floating around the bottom end seems to have been the issue. After lying dormant, said bolt got sucked into the works and collided with a bunch of stuff, apparently ruining a few of the big ends of the connecting rods and even breaking a few piston skirts for good measure. No one can believe that the engine kept running at all. Though way down on power, it did run and would even restart , and it was not all that loud. I will say that the failure felt major, anyone who has ever blown an engine will know what I mean, but the truck kept moving long enough to get the half mile, up hill, to where there was somewhere to get off the road.

 

I would not mind having the blown engine, it would make a great coffee table base (like the old British Top Gear set up).

 

It has been interesting, but no fun to have the truck expire before the temp tag. It will get a new engine, but will take two weeks.

Wow that is wild. I wonder if the 'inspected by' tag will be followed up on...

Posted

Statistically, early failures like this one are referred to as 'infant mortality'.

 

There always seem to be a few.

Posted

Statistically, early failures like this one are referred to as 'infant mortality'.

 

There always seem to be a few.

And realistically they are referred to as shoddy workmanship.

Posted

New engine is in truck and truck is running again as of Friday 10/16. Now working on getting the truck from Colorado to Kansas. GM is willing to ship it but thinks three weeks is an acceptable time frame for this to be accomplished. Needless to say I fell that a 10 hour drive can and should be accomplished much quicker than three weeks.

Posted

I would argue with GM. They can ship it covered pro hauler for less than $500. GM needs to make this right. Get to area manager and your dealership should get in on the argument . Bad PR for GM.

Posted

Got the truck back today. GM shipped it from dealer in Colorado that repaired it to a dealer in Kansas close to me. Runs like it should, so far so good!

Posted

Hopefully you have many trouble free miles now! Glad your on the road again!

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 5,346 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...