Jump to content

2015 Silverado 5.3, engine failure at 482 miles


sjgi48

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well GM should have given you a vehicle to drive regardless. I would go after them for the rental money.

 

This is why they have warranties on them. If an engine has an issue it will fail almost right away. Someone or machine most likely didn't tighten all of the Crank or Piston bolts so they backed off and boom.

 

Friend had an F150 they had to pull off of the carrier because the engine was DOA at the lot.

 

He just refused delivery and had them re-order it.

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Dealer pulled the oil pan off on Tuesday. A bolt (either extra or the self removing type, no one is sure and the remains are only generaly identifiable as a bolt) floating around the bottom end seems to have been the issue. After lying dormant, said bolt got sucked into the works and collided with a bunch of stuff, apparently ruining a few of the big ends of the connecting rods and even breaking a few piston skirts for good measure. No one can believe that the engine kept running at all. Though way down on power, it did run and would even restart , and it was not all that loud. I will say that the failure felt major, anyone who has ever blown an engine will know what I mean, but the truck kept moving long enough to get the half mile, up hill, to where there was somewhere to get off the road.

 

I would not mind having the blown engine, it would make a great coffee table base (like the old British Top Gear set up).

 

It has been interesting, but no fun to have the truck expire before the temp tag. It will get a new engine, but will take two weeks.

Posted

Dealer pulled the oil pan off on Tuesday. A bolt (either extra or the self removing type, no one is sure and the remains are only generaly identifiable as a bolt) floating around the bottom end seems to have been the issue. After lying dormant, said bolt got sucked into the works and collided with a bunch of stuff, apparently ruining a few of the big ends of the connecting rods and even breaking a few piston skirts for good measure. No one can believe that the engine kept running at all. Though way down on power, it did run and would even restart , and it was not all that loud. I will say that the failure felt major, anyone who has ever blown an engine will know what I mean, but the truck kept moving long enough to get the half mile, up hill, to where there was somewhere to get off the road.

 

I would not mind having the blown engine, it would make a great coffee table base (like the old British Top Gear set up).

 

It has been interesting, but no fun to have the truck expire before the temp tag. It will get a new engine, but will take two weeks.

Wow that is wild. I wonder if the 'inspected by' tag will be followed up on...

Posted

Statistically, early failures like this one are referred to as 'infant mortality'.

 

There always seem to be a few.

Posted

Statistically, early failures like this one are referred to as 'infant mortality'.

 

There always seem to be a few.

And realistically they are referred to as shoddy workmanship.

Posted

New engine is in truck and truck is running again as of Friday 10/16. Now working on getting the truck from Colorado to Kansas. GM is willing to ship it but thinks three weeks is an acceptable time frame for this to be accomplished. Needless to say I fell that a 10 hour drive can and should be accomplished much quicker than three weeks.

Posted

I would argue with GM. They can ship it covered pro hauler for less than $500. GM needs to make this right. Get to area manager and your dealership should get in on the argument . Bad PR for GM.

Posted

Got the truck back today. GM shipped it from dealer in Colorado that repaired it to a dealer in Kansas close to me. Runs like it should, so far so good!

Posted

Hopefully you have many trouble free miles now! Glad your on the road again!

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,938
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    C. Hart
    Newest Member
    C. Hart
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 519 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 287,500 Mile Service   8/13/2026   Reset Fuel Trims   Since the work done in the previous post there was a good improvement in response in all areas except right after a fill up where the LTFT would go -20%+ for about four miles while the STFT was near neutral. Before the work they both went very negative for a few miles after a fill up but act normal thereafter.    We did a systems check of the vapor recovery system for functionality and ability to hold a vacuum. That checked out fine. But this doesn't mean the charcoal canister is dead in the water. Testing that is next up. For now the reset of the fuel trims.    I intentionally shorted the fill exactly two gallons to eliminate any chance of filling the canister. On start up the trims were behaving normally until I got up and rolling where the LTFT went -10 / -11%% but the short was + 2 to 0%. Within a mile the the STFT offset the LTFT and by 2 miles they were neutral. HUGE improvement but still not hunky-dory.    I'll watch them for a few days. Perhaps another tank where I will fill completely to 'first click' and compare. Meanwhile on the hunt for a new canister and I'll toss another purge value at it for good measure. Pending the outcome of the canister test that is. Progress of any kind is welcome.    Fuel economy improvement with bringing hole #3 back to the living was a noticeable bump to the positive. Even on the few miles I drove after the refill I already see another bump up by the trims reset.     She's purring like a kitten with a warm bowl of milk.    BTW, adding 50 rpm to the idle took the majority of the negative timing out on cold start up and leaned the cold idle. No longer burbles in the cat. What a dumb way to heat a cat.      
    • Yeah, shame I can’t really get that filter easily anymore. Running a PureOne. Your fave!    TAN would be neat to see. Confirmation I ran it too long probably. 🤣
    • My son and I both bought new trucks in 2017. Both of us immediately put Truck Covers USA American Roll Covers on our trucks. My son still has his truck and it never sees the inside of a garage. We live in Alabama, so not much snow. My truck was my daily driver and was in the garage when I wasn't driving it or at work. No issues with either cover even after almost 9 years. About a year ago I sold my truck to my brother and bought a 2025 Silverado 2500. The second thing that I put on that truck was a new Truck Covers USA cover. They are very well made and have a very positive locking system. I looked at a Retrax and my concern was the way that the cover locked to the rail. BTW, the first thing I put on the new truck was step bars. Those new trucks are high!
    • The Allison 10 speed torque converter doesn't "lock up" like the previous transmissions. It has 4 operational modes; open, slip, transition from open to slip; transition from slip to open. I have an Edge CTS3 monitor and I monitor transmission torque converter slip. Step on the gas and you get a little slip. Take your foot off the gas and you get a little negative slip. I have not found a way to display the torque converter mode beyond that. My Edge CTS3 also displays something that our trucks should already display, the current gear. I also monitor throttle body position and engine load. If I see the engine load getting too high, I'll manually drop a gear.
    • Nice result. Your filter is working well  I'd have like to have seen the acid number for this sample. Curious type that I am. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...