Jump to content

Wheel Hub/Bearings - Not Covered Under Warranty


Sierra Jon

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have a '14 Sierra Z71 SLT CC 5.3L with 3.42's... currently have 48k miles.

 

Just about three weeks now I've been experiencing humming in the drivetrain. Starts at around 30 m.p.h. it's really loud at 45-50 and more quiet at 75 but still noticeable. Humming goes away when the weight of the truck is on the left side (moderate cornering).

 

Brought it in today and was told that it's one of my front wheel hubs and it's not covered under the powertrain warranty. I guess since 2010 hubs are no longer powertrain... Pissah

 

I'm contacting GM Customer Care to see if I can get them to cover the repair because I have a nearly new truck and the repair cost is 500 bucks. Something I wouldn't think GM would want their customers to experience.

 

I created this to see if anyone is having similar experiences... I know I saw some people who's dealerships have blamed their level kits for having to replace a hub but my ride height/suspension is totally stock.

 

Thanks all,

Sierra Jon

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Find a copy of the powertrain warranty, it will spell out what parts are covered and what is not. I would say bearings are considered a wear item and not covered.

Posted

Wheel bearings are not covered under powertrain. They were covered in the original powertrain back in '07 '09 era. Not since '10

Posted

Wouldn't you think that on 4x4 models they are indeed part of the drivetrain?

 

On 2wd models I can understand they're not likely to be covered as they aren't actually delivering any type of power.

 

Either way, that's way too soon for a hub to fail. I remember both on my 04 1500 sierra they went out at 90k and I was pissed about that too.

 

my 14 3.42 is in the shop now with a racket in the rear end...they're pulling it apart to see what's up. Too bad...35970 miles...

Posted

Definately not covered by warranty. Gotta love the sealed hub/bearing asm's that are maint free. Bearings rarely went bad back in the old days when it was routine maint to repack the bearings.

Posted

I had the front wheel hub bearings go loose on my '09 Chevy Impala at 75k miles and they were covered under 5 year/100k mile power train warranty. 2009 was the last year they covered bearings and hubs because evidently they elected to continue using the same crappy parts and instead of going to better quality hubs/bearings, it was a lot more advantageous to remove these from power train warranty coverage and have customer pay for replacement.

Posted

Exactly. Covered or not - we shouldn't be replacing anything except brakes, tires and wiper blades at 48k people.

 

The dealership was very good actually. They split the cost with me and GM Customer Care gave me another 100 bucks off the repairs.

 

I had the seat shims and the front bearings done for 225.00... So ultimately I'm satisfied but I shouldn't have been there in the first place.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Just for comparison, I had to replace front wheel bearings on my 1999 Mazda 626 at 230k miles when they started making noise. And the rear ones were still good at 340k miles. 75k on Impala vs 230k miles on Mazda is a huge difference in quality. Both cars were front wheel drive with a V6 engine. And a 1998 Nissan Maxima front bearings started getting loose at 200k miles (not making noise yet). All three vehicles were bought new so I knew the history of repairs and that all wheel bearings were the originals. This just confirms that GM uses substandard quality parts on their vehicles in comparison to Japanese.

Posted

I'm curious, do you still have stock size wheels and tires?

Yes I do. I don't even have a level.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

Sierra, I agree your front wheel bearing assy should last longer than 48K, but that bearing is subject to a great deal of abuse. They are designed to run approximately 100,000 miles no matter the application. Some things that can shorten the life of the bearing are curbs, potholes, manufacturing defect, railroad tracks, and virtually any type of impact. For example, a side impact, i.e. sliding in the snow into a curb puts a great deal of stress where one or more ball bearings dimple the chrome lining in the race. This is where the chrome will start to fail over the next few thousand miles. Within 3 ~ 5,000 miles you are prone to start hearing a whirring sound or a growl as you turn and load the side of the bearing. It's unfortunate, but it happens. Not a big deal but inconvenient. Like others have posted, I believe the bearings are considered a wear item and not covered. If you have a good relationship with your dealer, maybe they can get some help from GM. Perhaps they will pay half or pick up the parts and you pick up the labor. What does it hurt to ask nicely?

  • 11 months later...
Posted

Soooooo it looks like I'm having to do the other side now... In the shop now except I just put tires and a level on so I can't wait to hear that my tires caused my bearings to go.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Posted

On a FWD vehicle the hub bearing are part of the drivetrain, on a 4wd vehicle I would argue they are also part of the drivetrain as well. Though no matter if GM says no the dealer doesn't have a choice.

Posted

Just for comparison, I had to replace front wheel bearings on my 1999 Mazda 626 at 230k miles when they started making noise. And the rear ones were still good at 340k miles. 75k on Impala vs 230k miles on Mazda is a huge difference in quality. Both cars were front wheel drive with a V6 engine. And a 1998 Nissan Maxima front bearings started getting loose at 200k miles (not making noise yet). All three vehicles were bought new so I knew the history of repairs and that all wheel bearings were the originals. This just confirms that GM uses substandard quality parts on their vehicles in comparison to Japanese.

 

Interesting how +,-25 years ago you'd see "made in Japan" and say to self.... nope, I'll pas on that. And quite often now days made in Japan is a good thing. Now we/manufacturers are using too much Chinese junk.

 

Considering what these trucks cost wheel bearings should be a warrantee item regardless of what GM says. fwiw, rear bearings in my '07 Sierra needed replacement at about 130,000 miles.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...