Jump to content

Chevy, Ford, Ram, Toyota?

Sportznut

By Sportznut
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

Sportznut Enthusiast

Sportznut

Posted
Posted

I bought a 2014 Ram 1500 Crew Cab with 5.7 Hemi. I have about 24,000 miles on it now. For the most part I'm pretty satisfied.

 

The only issues I've had is some recalls that the dealer took care of without any problems.

 

The only thing I don't like about my Ram is the ride when the road gets bumpy. It is really harsh. Could be as simple as upgrading the shocks or springs.

 

I have come to realize that I should have ordered a higher level of trim. I have the Big Horn package with several options (Nav, big screen, heated steering wheel, bumper sensors, tow package, bed liner, 20" wheels, etc) but I want leather, remote start, and a few other goodies. I know I could get these in the aftermarket.

 

I'm thinking I want a different color, and I don't think I want my current Ram to get beyond the factory warranty period. I bought white but think I want red. I will take a bit of a hit financially but that is ok as this is a business expense so the hit won't be as bad.

 

 

I did not know Ram was actually owned by Fiat until after I purchased it. Obviously buying foreign is not a major hurdle for me anyhow.

 

 

My point is I'm going to get a chance to redo this and I'm wondering if I should consider all four brands. Each has its pros and cons in my opinion. It's just a matter of which has the least amount of issues with expensive fixes.

 

Of the four the only one I would be concerned with the powertrain might be the Ford EcoBoost as it approaches the 80 - 100, 000 mile range. I would not have the concern with the Ford V8. I do like the fact that Ford did not participate in the bailout.

 

I have a real comfort zone with Toyota products because 3 out of my last 4 new cars were Toyotas and I put almost 400,000 miles on them without any reliability issues.

 

But I think the American brands have come a long way too.

 

 

I like the looks of the Chevy and some of the unique features like the step bumper. The ride seems quieter and smoother. The 5.3 seems rock solid, has enough power, mated with the 8 speed transmission seems to get great MPG like my Ram. The term "great" is relative to trucks. The soft paint is a little concerning.

 

I drive mostly highway miles and I don't tow anything.

 

Surprisingly I have not checked out the Toyota very closely. When I bought my Ram the Toyota was going for at least $10,000 higher, so I did not pursue it.

 

The sticker on my Ram was approximately $47,000 and I paid approximately $35,000 before taxes. I will need to pay a little bit more to get what I'm looking for regardless of which brand.

 

So my questions to some of you is if you were to do it again what brand would you buy today? And why or why not? What would be your second choice?

 

I do realize I am asking a bunch of Chevy owners so some loyalty driven responses are expected.

 

I did search and read several threads so I have a feel for some of the pros & cons of the Chevy but feel free to add any details you want.

 

Thanks for any input you might offer.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted

I'm just here to say the tundra is one ugly mofo. That's all

Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

I was dead set on getting a RAM. But I went to the Auto show last year just to make sure that was the right choice and compare them all side to side.

 

In the comparisons at the show, Chevy won me over thus here I am.

 

I'm not a fan of the Fords, but I still like the looks of some Rams.

 

I'd go Chevy again though, I love this truck.

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Sportznut Enthusiast

Sportznut

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm just here to say the tundra is one ugly mofo. That's all

I agree that Toyota's in general lag behind in looks across the entire brand.

 

But I am kind of ugly too so I won't cross them off the list based on looks alone.[emoji41]

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

harveyfamily Enthusiast

harveyfamily

Posted
Posted

One thing the Toyota has going for it is it's built in the USA. But, Toyota is very proud of their truck and when I was looking at them I could not get them to budge much off of MSRP.

GMCSierra4x4 Enthusiast

GMCSierra4x4

Posted
Posted

At this point, I think the new Nissan Titan with 5.0L Cummins Diesel and Allison Transmission is a big contender. It is the same price as the gas version in all other brands. However, it is a first year design.

MikeNH Senior Enthusiast

MikeNH

Posted
Posted

The Ram rides better than any pickup I've driven so I'm not sure how you'll find the rest.

 

I've driven all of them except the Toyota and honestly the Ram is my current favorite, despite being a GM fan.

 

The Ford seats were uncomfortable. Too firm and this has been an issue on F-150s for a while now in my opinion. Also, no matter how they spin it, aluminum body repair complicates things. The 5.0 is nice (I have no use for their EcoBoost) and the trucks do look good and have some innovative features though. Sync 3 is supposed to be much better than the last generation of infotainment but the last stuff was so bad I generally would refuse Fords as rentals because it was so terrible (I travel often for work).

 

Toyota is probably a solid platform, I love the full-width roll down window on the crew cab and Toyota offers some real nice TRD (their performance division) parts that are very well integrated. They do poorly when it comes to fuel economy though.

 

GM makes a good all around truck but nothing to me stands out as being exceptional. They tune the throttle too lazy and I don't like how low they sit.

 

Rams (and Chrysler in general) have the best infotainment system out there currently though Toyota is a close second aside from navigation. With the dual exhaust from the factory the truck sounds real nice too. While I like the styling, I'm not a fan of the fallout from it. I don't like not being able to see the fenders and when it comes to ride, despite being smooth I always feel like I'm sitting on top of the truck rather than in it with Rams and this has been a sensation I've noticed going back to the 94-01 body style.

RyanbabZ71 Senior Enthusiast

RyanbabZ71

Posted
Posted

nissan titan, only because it wasnt a choice

dave07 Enthusiast

dave07

Posted
Posted

For me, it was between the Tundra and the GM twins. I came from a lemon 2013 Ford Mustang that was total junk. I truly believe Ford is turning out complete junk right now. Ram was a close 3rd choice but I couldn't stand owning a Fiat/Chrysler brand with their record of reliability. The reason I chose the GM over the Tundra was Toyota wouldn't budge on price, they are basically on a 9 year old platform with the current truck (GM just redesigned theirs), and the Tundra is atrocious on gas mileage.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted

At this point, I think the new Nissan Titan with 5.0L Cummins Diesel and Allison Transmission is a big contender. It is the same price as the gas version in all other brands. However, it is a first year design.

 

Uh no. Its an AISIN not and ALLISON. AISIN. AISIN makes the transmission behind the high output 6.7 and 4500/5500 RAM trucks, and there is an AISIN in almost every Toyota.

Willshire Enthusiast

Willshire

Posted
Posted

Since i tightened the u-bolts on my AT i love it. Has what i want and gets excellent gas mileage on the highway. 22-25 mpg is pretty good for a 7000lb truck and a v8. Toyota was ugly, RAM is.... well, a chrylser, and two of my buds have fords and they are uncomfortable.

Ridersfan Enthusiast

Ridersfan

Posted
Posted

I bought a 2014 Ram 1500 Crew Cab with 5.7 Hemi. I have about 24,000 miles on it now. For the most part I'm pretty satisfied.

 

The only issues I've had is some recalls that the dealer took care of without any problems.

 

The only thing I don't like about my Ram is the ride when the road gets bumpy. It is really harsh. Could be as simple as upgrading the shocks or springs.

 

I have come to realize that I should have ordered a higher level of trim. I have the Big Horn package with several options (Nav, big screen, heated steering wheel, bumper sensors, tow package, bed liner, 20" wheels, etc) but I want leather, remote start, and a few other goodies. I know I could get these in the aftermarket.

 

I'm thinking I want a different color, and I don't think I want my current Ram to get beyond the factory warranty period. I bought white but think I want red. I will take a bit of a hit financially but that is ok as this is a business expense so the hit won't be as bad.

 

 

I did not know Ram was actually owned by Fiat until after I purchased it. Obviously buying foreign is not a major hurdle for me anyhow.

 

 

My point is I'm going to get a chance to redo this and I'm wondering if I should consider all four brands. Each has its pros and cons in my opinion. It's just a matter of which has the least amount of issues with expensive fixes.

 

Of the four the only one I would be concerned with the powertrain might be the Ford EcoBoost as it approaches the 80 - 100, 000 mile range. I would not have the concern with the Ford V8. I do like the fact that Ford did not participate in the bailout.

 

I have a real comfort zone with Toyota products because 3 out of my last 4 new cars were Toyotas and I put almost 400,000 miles on them without any reliability issues.

 

But I think the American brands have come a long way too.

 

 

I like the looks of the Chevy and some of the unique features like the step bumper. The ride seems quieter and smoother. The 5.3 seems rock solid, has enough power, mated with the 8 speed transmission seems to get great MPG like my Ram. The term "great" is relative to trucks. The soft paint is a little concerning.

 

I drive mostly highway miles and I don't tow anything.

 

Surprisingly I have not checked out the Toyota very closely. When I bought my Ram the Toyota was going for at least $10,000 higher, so I did not pursue it.

 

The sticker on my Ram was approximately $47,000 and I paid approximately $35,000 before taxes. I will need to pay a little bit more to get what I'm looking for regardless of which brand.

 

So my questions to some of you is if you were to do it again what brand would you buy today? And why or why not? What would be your second choice?

 

I do realize I am asking a bunch of Chevy owners so some loyalty driven responses are expected.

 

I did search and read several threads so I have a feel for some of the pros & cons of the Chevy but feel free to add any details you want.

 

Thanks for any input you might offer.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Umm, Ford has taken just as much govt money under a different program as GM and Chrysler have.... the whole Ford didn't take a bailout is a lie. They absolutely have in the 80's in the 90's and in the early 2000's. Then they got a dept of energy loan during the bailout. Ford is hypocritical to advertise they never took a bailout.

Sportznut Enthusiast

Sportznut

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I read this on the internet so it must be true [emoji12]

 

Unless you have some type of Insider information I assume you base your opinion on what you read just like I do.

 

There are several versions of the story and I will admit I have no way of verifying any of them , do you? I chose to believe what I read on factcheck.org

 

It is true that Ford took advantage ($5.9 billion) of the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Program (ATVM) to develop and tool up more fuel-efficient vehicles. But technically that is not an emergency bailout due to financial crisis.

 

The feds offered the ATVM program and several manufacturers took advantage of it including Nissan, Tesla, Fisker, and VPG.

 

Of course each media outlet seems to want to twist the facts to fit their sensationalized message of the moment to improve their ratings or internet hits. So we have to read between the lines to find the truth..... if there is any to find.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

tnchevy Senior Enthusiast

tnchevy

Posted
Posted

I have family members who are die hard Ford fanatics and liked to give me grief over GM taking the bailout. I then remind them that Harley Davidson and Verizon wireless were also part of the same package that GM was under but I don't see them switching cell phone carriers (verizon only one that picks up around here) and selling or badmouthing their HD's.

Graphic Enthusiast

Graphic

Posted
Posted

I think the Silverado rode better and had better interior material. Silverado was a higher trim level though, so that might be the case. Cab is super quiet. Infotainment system VERY slow.

 

The Ram looks better and when I press the gas it goes, it doesn't think about it for a couple seconds first. Of course, I had the terribly tuned 6 speed and now they have 8 speeds like the Ram. I haven't had any real issues with the Ram like the issues I had on the Silverado. Ride is okay, but I have a Sport which might be a little stiffer. Not enough to bug me. Infotainment system pretty darn good. I do admit like someone else said that it is odd not to see the fenders, but I find that is only an issue when parking. Sometimes it looks like my wife parked the thing. After a year I am still working on this... lol

 

I took the new Ford for a spin. It just feels awkward in the cab and the I am not sure about the aluminum body yet...

 

Toyota, like everyone else says, are ugly and get terrible mileage for now. In serious need of an update. However, if the toyota fans are to be believed, it'll be ugly and getting terrible gas mileage for a lot of troublefree miles.

 

Nissan had a truck at the outdoor expo I was at last weekend. It looked sharp and aggressive. Don't know about the interior because it was locked and I couldn't get in... No one was around to unlock it. :(

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...