Jump to content

Took my truck down the 1/4 mile


Recommended Posts

Posted

I did a pre-blower run with the truck tonight, gotta figure out my dollars per tenth of a second. Only "performance" mod was the cat back. I left everything in the truck including my tools, fire extinguisher, etc just over 1/2 a tank of fuel. I figured the weight of the rolling toneau cover and tools should about cancel out the small hp increase from the cat-back. I launched in 4HI and switched to 2wd before the 1-2 shift. I did a couple runs trying to break torque, but there must be some safety built in because it would just bog and wait then slowly accelerate. Those runs were 14.7xx and 14.6xx. The final run I did no break torquing and just hit the gas after the split second I let off the break. In all three runs I hit the speed limiter, kinda funny a stock truck hits that in the 1/4 mile. The final run us below, I'm car #715 in the left lane.

 

80-img_20160511_215128503_ac82ecc3917eec

Posted

I tried both on and off, it doesn't help with bogging from the two pedal overlap. The final run when I just nailed it, I did have tc off though.

Posted

Yes, it's in the tune. With the right tune you can brake torque it up to ~2500 RPM and greatly improve your launch. Nice time though, congrats!

Posted

14.0 in a stock truck that isn't meant to be a performance truck (Lightning etc) is just silly!

Posted

14.0 in a stock truck that isn't meant to be a performance truck (Lightning etc) is just silly!

 

 

I know, I had a couple people ask me what I had done to the truck, like tune, cia, etc. I told them the catback and all the rest were astetics. I told my brother I wanted to get into the 12's in street attire with the blower and I would pulley down till that happened. From the stock time, I don't think I'll have an issue with low boost breaking into the 12's.

Posted

Dang, 14.0 in a stock 4WD truck! I can remember when that was the time of most stock muscle cars. Very nice!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

That's moving right along. Truck picked up just shy of 20mph in the back half, which is darn good, probably would have surpassed that number if top speed was not limited. On the negative side, track is only 92 feet above sea level, don't know about the day you ran, but DA for 5/22/16 is listed at 297', that's pretty good air. As for getting into the 12's. wide variance dropping to 12.00 vs 12.95. Gonna be tough to get much lower than a 1.85-1.90 60' time (what are you running for tires?). For comparison, my '69 Chevelle was driven to the track on MT Drag Radials. As I added power, the 60' time got progressively worse instead of better. First couple years with a 454 putting out about 550HP car would hit 1.65-1.76 60' times and run 11.60-11.70/115-116 in the 1/4. Eventually we dropped in a 540" motor, dyno'd at 705HP. It was like driving on a wet road trying to get the car moving. 60' times increased to 1.85-2.00, was horrible. Yes the car did ET lower and MPH higher, hitting 11.20-30 at 124-125 mph, but keep in mind it took 700HP to get there. Keep in mind, this was a fully optioned street cruiser with factory A/C, all stock body, car weighed 4070# with driver. Will be interesting to see where you go with this. Two schools of thought getting down the track, one is blast it out the hole, other is run it out the back door. First takes suspension, tires and converter, the later takes raw HP.

Posted

I'm running 275/55r20 Grabber UHP's. While stock I still couldn't gain traction in 2wd launches, but on the street it stuck much better on part throttle. I'm hoping even with the blower I can still hook in a 4x4 launch and shift out on the 1-2 shift like I did stock.

Posted

Damn good times. Think your goal of getting into the 12s with the charger and different tires is definitely possible.

Posted

Running it through the calculators, the 1/8 mile and 1/4 mile ET/MPH incrementals are correct for a 14.09/96.9 ET/MPH. Assuming a race weight of 5800#, motor was putting out right at 400HP to net the 14.09/96.9. You'll need to boost power to 525HP to hit a 12.90/105MPH. More important, will need to shave .80 off the 1/8 mile time with .15-.20 coming off the 60' time. I know you said you wanted to run it in pure street trim (tools, tonneau, etc.), but JMHO, running a truck down the end of track at WOT is different than trying to launch a truck at the beginning of the track. Dropping weight doesn't show up as much in MPH as it does ET.

Posted

I Just got on the scales at the local dump and inafter the blower was put on in "Street trim" and with a full tank of gas plus me I'm just over 6,000lbs. Still tuning back and fourth with Black Bear, but I'm hopeful. I don't want to get into a cam swap or the LT4 HPFP/injectors so we'll see how much room the stock fuel system has for more boost if I need it. I'd rather not push it to the end and then 60,000 miles later when things are more worn in so the fuel system is functioning at 95% I go lean and pop goes the motor.

Posted

I Just got on the scales at the local dump and inafter the blower was put on in "Street trim" and with a full tank of gas plus me I'm just over 6,000lbs. Still tuning back and fourth with Black Bear, but I'm hopeful. I don't want to get into a cam swap or the LT4 HPFP/injectors so we'll see how much room the stock fuel system has for more boost if I need it. I'd rather not push it to the end and then 60,000 miles later when things are more worn in so the fuel system is functioning at 95% I go lean and pop goes the motor.

I think you will surpass 12.90

I have a friend that had a new ford raptor, with the roush supercharger

All the goodies longtubes, tune, you name it .. 13.20 &13.30 the best he saw

he actually sold that raptor

And got another eco boost and did a few bolt ons and nailed 13.10

He has had 3 eco boost

12s are in your future sir

gm 6.2 are a beast

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...