Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No. A 16 will not fit. Starting in 2005, the front brakes changed and a 16 will not clear. 17 isnt a bad size.

  • Like 1
Posted

Interesting question. I know that the 17" stock wheels on the previous generation trucks were 1/2 narrower. If you picked up a set of these it would allow for slightly smaller tire sizes. I agree with Chris that 17" is a good size. You can fit a variety of tire sizes giving a wide range of over all wheel diameters. There has been a steady upward creep of wheel rim diameters over the years and tire manufactures cater to the most popular sizes with the greatest choice of tires. It wasn't that long ago that 16" rims looked big on a 1/2 ton. 14" and 15" were common!

Posted

I'm not a fan of huge rims either. They seems flashy, but it seems like these new trucks were meant to have a 20. In my opinion the others look too small for it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Yep Chris nailed it, 17" is smallest you can go (I did a 05+ brake upgrade on my 02, thank goodness I already had 17's). 17" wheel is a great size IMO, when I had 35's and 37's on them they looked great either way

Posted (edited)

Interesting question. I know that the 17" stock wheels on the previous generation trucks were 1/2 narrower. If you picked up a set of these it would allow for slightly smaller tire sizes. I agree with Chris that 17" is a good size. You can fit a variety of tire sizes giving a wide range of over all wheel diameters. There has been a steady upward creep of wheel rim diameters over the years and tire manufactures cater to the most popular sizes with the greatest choice of tires. It wasn't that long ago that 16" rims looked big on a 1/2 ton. 14" and 15" were common!

I had a 93,94 & a 96 rcsb trucks with 15"x10" rims with p295/50/15 bfg tires. I liked the look. The only good I see in the bigger rims is in the case of a blow out there's less sidewall so more control. Ride comfort suffers & the look of a tire stretched around the rim like a rubber band just doesn't look that good to me. Guess I'm stuck with 17". Any advice on where to look for something around a 17x10" rim with a wide tire that matches the same height as the factory tire? That way I don't have to recalibrate for tire height change. Edited by brokesilverado
Posted

I had a 93,94 & a 96 rcsb trucks with 15"x10" rims with p295/50/15 bfg tires. I liked the look. The only good I see in the bigger rims is in the case of a blow out there's less sidewall so more control. Ride comfort suffers & the look of a tire stretched around the rim like a rubber band just doesn't look that good to me. Guess I'm stuck with 17". Any advice on where to look for something around a 17x10" rim with a wide tire that matches the same height as the factory tire? That way I don't have to recalibrate for tire height change.

A 285/65r 17 (for example) will give you stock height and have more sidewall than your 295/50. Your stock 17x8 rims will fit 295 width tires but I believe you may have some rubbing without a level or lift. Hopefully someone will have suggestions for aftermarket wheels which will accommodate wider tires without rubbing.

Posted (edited)

A 285/65r 17 (for example) will give you stock height and have more sidewall than your 295/50. Your stock 17x8 rims will fit 295 width tires but I believe you may have some rubbing without a level or lift. Hopefully someone will have suggestions for aftermarket wheels which will accommodate wider tires without rubbing.

Thanks for the info. I really don't want to lift it any as its a 2wd. I wouldn't mind lowering it just a little maybe a 2/4" drop. Of course I'm not that up to date on thsee trucks as to what size fits without rubbing. Edited by brokesilverado
Posted

You will get the best tire prices with 17" wheels or a 275/55R20 since that is what a lot of truck manufacturers use for stock. Also a 245/70R17, 255/70R17, and 265/70R17 since those are the common sizes on trucks

Posted

i got the 20'...grr.. . i dread the day i have to pick up some new all terrain rubber for it.. .. my 17's on the last truck ran about 270 a tire..

Posted

i got the 20'...grr.. . i dread the day i have to pick up some new all terrain rubber for it.. .. my 17's on the last truck ran about 270 a tire..

As long as you keep stock size, prices will be decent. Of course they will go up with tire quality.
Posted

As long as you keep stock size, prices will be decent. Of course they will go up with tire quality.

yah i'm keeping stock... i did the oversize on the last truck... gas suffered... stock is fine

  • 5 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was the GM of a Lincoln Mercury dealership back in the 80's. The service lot was always full with "broken" ones. Plenty of transmissions, power windows and a/c repairs. The only one I'd consider owning would be the Marauder at this point and it certainly wouldn't be a daily driver.  My 2025 GMC Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate is my "Lincoln Town Car" in my retirement. I want all the "stuff". Big infotainment screens, one touch power windows, Supercruise (I won't buy another vehicle without it), hands free pretty much everything. I'm going to swap my current truck for a 2027 Yukon Denali Ultimate so I can have the air suspension and surround vision recording along with all the other "stuff". 
    • Yep mine is on backorder also.
    • The Denali Ultimate's grille is tinted, but the "regular' Denali has a bright chrome grille like the current models.
    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...