Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Everyone,

 

New to the forum, but wanted to jump in as I just had the same issue with a 2014 w/ 67k miles. Ordered the new AC Delco part on Amazon for $134 shipped to my door. Local mechanic's shop quoted $500 for the labor. DIY or pay up? What do you guys think?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Zach Lucas said:

Hi Everyone,

 

New to the forum, but wanted to jump in as I just had the same issue with a 2014 w/ 67k miles. Ordered the new AC Delco part on Amazon for $134 shipped to my door. Local mechanic's shop quoted $500 for the labor. DIY or pay up? What do you guys think?

After watching video probably take me 1-2 hour with a beer mixed in. I dont know about you, but I dont make 250-500 an hour yet at my day job.

Edited by jrob56
Posted

hardest or most time consuming aspect would be recharging the system.

I would do all the labor and just pay someone to charge it back up.

Posted

I want to know why in the world the truck owners have not been reimbursed for these repairs????

I think there is a reimbursement program for the SUV owners 

My condenser went out last year approximately 72k

good thing I had a extended warranty 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

These parts are trash and GM knows it. I had it replaced by the dealer, it worked till the warrantee ran out and went bad. They wanted $1300 the first time but GM had some assistance program (I think it should be a  free recall) so I paid a few hundred. Now the new one has gone out and it’s out of warrantee. Poor quality and service 

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, JFREED said:

These parts are trash and GM knows it. I had it replaced by the dealer, it worked till the warrantee ran out and went bad. They wanted $1300 the first time but GM had some assistance program (I think it should be a  free recall) so I paid a few hundred. Now the new one has gone out and it’s out of warrantee. Poor quality and service 

Honestly the aftermarket makes a better condenser than the GM branded unit. Even the assistance program cannot touch the lower cost of replacing it yourself

Funny how they slap a piece of aluminized tape in the upper right corner and call it a fix.

Edited by Sierra Dan
Posted

Yeah it’s disappointing for sure. Unless I own something else under warranty they won’t ever touch another vehicle I own. 

Posted

I kinda hope mine in my 2014 SLE goes out before April 2021 when I lose my extended warramty…… sad thinking but I almost prefer to do it myself only once with a aftermarket part. Ohh GM....neva again

 

Yotaman

Posted

Condenser leak on my 2015 with 66k.  Planning to pick one up from NAPA today.  Anybody that has done this job - did you also replace any o-rings/seals?  I see they have an o-ring/seal kit for the whole system.

 

AC Leak2.jpg

Posted (edited)
On 6/4/2019 at 10:59 AM, Sierra Dan said:

Honestly the aftermarket makes a better condenser than the GM branded unit. Even the assistance program cannot touch the lower cost of replacing it yourself

Funny how they slap a piece of aluminized tape in the upper right corner and call it a fix.

Just had my AC Condensor replaced at 74k miles. Extended warranty covered it (and some other issues I was having).

 

Can you elaborate on what this tape is. It sticks out like a sore thumb in the grill when looking at the truck from the front. What is this tape? What the hell is it doing, or supposed to be doing? This is the first I've seen of it mentioned online.

 

I questioned the dealer about taking it off/removing it. Service Writer (who is NOT very strong in the technical details area) said "It's there for thermal absorption".......as a mechanical engineer, I can tell this answer is complete BS. He did say "You can paint it black if the appearance bothers you, but don't remove it"

 

Here's some pics to show where/what the tape is:

StupidTape1.thumb.jpg.c3a50308715037b1ac122ee4b9aaee3f.jpg

 

StupidTape2.thumb.jpg.7f4ed2c8d9b4c640c75775307535e267.jpg

 

Thanks in advance!

Edited by 2kwik4u
Posted

The elaboration is this...

GM engineers came up with this fix to help prevent "stress cracks" from forming where the condenser and round tube dryer meet.

This was derived in lieu of a new beefier designed unit. Cost cutting measure i'm sure.

That is why IMHO a good aftermarket unit is a better option than this "upgraded" factory condenser for those who are replacing themselves.

 

 

Posted
On 6/7/2019 at 11:38 AM, rcmiller said:

Condenser leak on my 2015 with 66k.  Planning to pick one up from NAPA today.  Anybody that has done this job - did you also replace any o-rings/seals?  I see they have an o-ring/seal kit for the whole system.

 

AC Leak2.jpg

YES. I recommend Replacing the two Seals where the a/c lines connect to the condenser.

Napa, Autozone have a full kit for around $12 or i think you can find the two gaskets at the dealer for $4-$6 each.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Sierra Dan said:

The elaboration is this...

GM engineers came up with this fix to help prevent "stress cracks" from forming where the condenser and round tube dryer meet.

This was derived in lieu of a new beefier designed unit. Cost cutting measure i'm sure.

That is why IMHO a good aftermarket unit is a better option than this "upgraded" factory condenser for those who are replacing themselves.

 

 

Wait, so you're saying that the tape there is meant to work as a structural connection to help eliminate cracking in the area? Like a gusset of sorts? Surely not?!?

Posted
2 hours ago, 2kwik4u said:

Wait, so you're saying that the tape there is meant to work as a structural connection to help eliminate cracking in the area? Like a gusset of sorts? Surely not?!?

I believe the purpose of the tape is not to be structural help, but instead to block off part of the cooler so there are less thermal cycles in that area.  Essentially, it allows that part of the cooler to maintain a more constant temperature with less highs and lows (those are a key  driver in thermal fatigue cracks).

Posted
14 hours ago, ksiesel said:

I believe the purpose of the tape is not to be structural help, but instead to block off part of the cooler so there are less thermal cycles in that area.  Essentially, it allows that part of the cooler to maintain a more constant temperature with less highs and lows (those are a key  driver in thermal fatigue cracks).

That makes better sense, but still feels like a 1/2 way fix. Thanks GM.

 

Is the reflective surface doing anything in this process, or is it just blocking airflow? Can I stick a can of spray paint in the grill and at least get the eyesore somewhat hidden?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...