Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

Just wanted to see if anyone has any experience towing with a 2015 Suburban, or can offer me some advice. We just bought a Jayflight travel trailer that will have a dry weight of around 6700lbs. My Suburban has the max trailer package, so I'm supposed to be good up to 8000lbs. I've never towed anything beyond a wood splitter before, so I'm kind of freaking out about the what ifs. I'm getting the Equalizer 4 point sway control WDH, and I know to be conscientious about adding weight, so I'm sure I'll be fine on local state park trips (Ohio). However, I see more ambitious trips in our future. (Florida first, out west eventually). I'm wondering if I should bite the bullet, and get a truck? I hate to take a big hit on the Suburban and start over with another car payment, but I want to be confident that my vehicle can handle any situation I find myself in, when I have 7000+lbs attached to me. I see 3 possible scenarios:

 

1 - keep the Suburban. Keep it well maintained. Drive slowly. Maybe switch to LT tires instead of the stock P tires? (Hold breath and cross fingers when crossing over continental divide)

 

2- get 1500 truck w/6.2L engine. Am I getting enough truck to really make a difference, or is this a slight improvement, for a lot of money?

 

3- get a 2500 truck. gas or diesel? Is this overkill for that 1 cross country trip per year, or well worth the piece of mind knowing you can tackle anything you come across?

 

I appreciate any and all feedback. Thanks!

Posted

My trailer (Cougar 30RKS) has a rated dry weight of 6,762. Loaded without water, I hit it's max weight rating of 8,200. But my wife brings a lot of scrapbooking stuff camping :)

 

I'm pulling with a Max trailering package. So I have a tow rating of 10,800, and consider it COMPLETELY irrelevant.

 

You will run out of payload long before you run out of trailer capacity. In my case, I have the 7,600 GVW and my truck weighed in at 7,540 loaded for 2 weeks holidays. So I was very close to the limit.

 

Estimate the trailer weight based on the loaded (dry plus carrying capacity) weight. Figure tongue weight of 12.5% (middle of the range) and add 100 lbs for the hitch ( I have the same one and it's not light). Compare that to the trucks payload capacity on the yellow sticker on the door jam. Whatever is left (if anything) is what you have for whatever you weigh over 150, plus all passengers, gear etc. in the truck.

 

In short, I really doubt the Suburban will be able to do it.

 

If you get a 1500, make sure it is the NHT package (either 5.3 or 6.2). While I am at my limit, I am happier with this truck for all the non-towing driving I do and do not miss having a 2500. I had a 2001 2500 with a Duramax and it was a harsher ride and didn't suit my daily commute (~3.5 kms). But it was a better tow vehicle. Some hills I am now limited to 80 kmh where with the diesel I could do 110. Not sure if the 6.2 would make a lot of difference there, but as I bought an lower trim level truck, I didn't have the option.

 

I live in BC, Canada so I know all about hills etc.

Posted

Thanks for the fast response. I didn't go into the GVWR, but that is a concern of mine as well. On a 4wd Suburban it should be 7500lbs. Curb weight is about 6000lb, so a 800-900lb tongue weight + family of 4 + cargo eats that GVWR up pretty quick. Guess I'm leaning towards a new truck (and dooming myself to forever parking outside of the garage) unless somebody talks me out of it.

Posted

Look on the drivers side door, there will be a sticker that tells the specific payload capacity of your suburban as it left the factory. It will say something like total passenger and cargo weight should not exceed XXXXlb. What does it say?

Posted

Bear,

 

Welcome and congrats on the new tt!!!

 

What did you guys get???

 

As mentioned, with any 1500/150 tow vehicle (truck or suv), it will usually max/exceed the payload limit before reaching the max tow rating.

 

Look for the yellow sticker in the drivers door of your 'burb, as well as any possible new truck if you decide to go that route. It states "All occupants and cargo not to exceed: XXXXlbs". That is the rated payload for that vehicle as it rolled off the assembly line, before any accessories have been added. I disagree with Kenzie regarding 150lbs for a driver being in addition to the stated sticker payload. I post this based on the wording of the sticker- "ALL OCCUPANTS...". To me that means any occupant in the vehicle, which includes all of the driver weight.

 

How much does the whole family weigh, what do you anticipate hauling in the rear of the burb or truck bed (cooler(s), firewood, bikes, etc), what accessories do you think you may add to a truck (step bars, tonneau cover or truck cap/topped, etc)? Add those weights up plus the ~100lbs for the wdh, and see what's left from the yellow sticker as mentioned.

 

Keep in mind the average rv owner adds about 1000lbs to the "brochure" dry weight if the trailer. So you could be very close to 8000lbs all loaded up for a trip. And with a 12-15% tw, that could be ~ 960lbs-1200lbs tw. For a tt, you generally need 12-15% of the loaded trailer weight to be tw. Obviously this will vary from trailer to trailer, but in a lot of cases having a lower tw can and will result sway which can be very dangerous. While the E4 is a great wdh system, the integrated sway control could mask a light tw issue until it's to late, so still be careful loading!

 

Speaking of tw, the "brochure" dry tw usually does not include the weight of the propane tanks or a battery on the tongue. That adds ~120lbs for 2-20lb tanks and a battery, or ~160lbs for 2-30lb tanks and a battery before even loading the trailer with anything else.

 

So to answer the big question, will your burb tow the trailer? Yes, it will. But pending on the family weight, and actual loaded tw, you may be over the payload, and possibly the rear axle rating. Same thing with a 1500 GM Truck, pending the family/cargo/accessories/tw total and what towing options the new truck has.

 

Do go for the NHT Max Tow package if you stay with a 1500. 5.3 would probably do the job with the NHT option, but the 6.2 would do it better towing cross country. If you go for a 2500HD, gas or diesel will do the job. Just depends on how much you want to spend, and if you like keeping the motor rpms down or don't mind letting the motor rev if needed to make it up inclines. With the gasser you may need to let the motor rev 3k + when towing depending on the terrain.

 

Good luck!!!

Posted

Thank you everyone. To answer a couple questions:

It's a Jayco Jayflight 27BHS. It's a little under 32' long, and the one on the lot we looked at had s dry weight of 6600lbs. We added few options to it. My understanding is that dry weight includes a full load of propane and generator fuel when applicable.

 

I'm not at my vehicle at the moment, but the gvwr should be about 7500lbs. Curb weight is listed as 5800, I believe, but again I maxed out the options on it, so I assume around 6000lbs. My understanding is that curb weight includes a 150lb driver and a full tank of gas.

 

So to sum it all up, we knew we would be pushing the limits of the gvwr, gcwr, and rear axle limits. We figured we'd pack very carefully, and hit the scales before leaving, but the more I think about, I think we'll be much better off with a truck that can handle anything we throw at it, without agonizing over every pound.

 

Thanks for the advice. If any one has an opinion on gas vs diesel, I'm all ears. I know nothing about diesel, so will hit some dealers for some test drives soon.

 

And if anyone is in the Cincinnati area, and could recommend a good place to get weighed, that would be awesome too.

 

Thanks!

  • Like 1
Posted

Diesel are great for towing, no question. If you plan to tow a lot, diesel is the answer. But if you plan to commute everyday with the vehicle, do short runs, stop and go, the diesel will not like it. They need to be worked for their own sake.

 

I parked my diesel for the last couple of winters I owned it and drove beaters. The thing wouldn't come close to operating temps on my commute and would start coughing black smoke at times.

 

Diesel is more money up front, fuel can be more expensive, maintenance is a little more and if something breaks, it can be more to fix.

 

If you do go diesel, check the trucks payload. On a 3/4 ton, it can be in the 2,300 lb range vs over 3K for gas. Honestly, if I wanted diesel, it'd be 1 ton only.

Posted

gmckenzie,

Thanks for following up. I agonized over the decision, but I've decided to go with diesel. The couple people I know with diesel, swear to me that I won't be dissapointed. And I am taking GMC at their word that I'll get gas-like engine start up all the way down to -20F. I loved the fact that I averaged 20mpg on the highway during my test drive, if for no other reason than, that's a couple less times I'll need to stop for fill ups when on vacation and pulling a 32 foot trailer. I also really like the idea of an exhaust brake. I hope it's not the wrong decision, but if it is, I'm told diesel trucks really hold their value. Hopefully, worst case, I can swap it with a gas truck down the road, without too much of a loss. As far as payload, the 3/4 ton will have plenty for my needs. So, Denali here I come....

  • Like 2
Posted

Diesel are great for towing, no question. If you plan to tow a lot, diesel is the answer. But if you plan to commute everyday with the vehicle, do short runs, stop and go, the diesel will not like it. They need to be worked for their own sake.

 

I parked my diesel for the last couple of winters I owned it and drove beaters. The thing wouldn't come close to operating temps on my commute and would start coughing black smoke at times.

 

Diesel is more money up front, fuel can be more expensive, maintenance is a little more and if something breaks, it can be more to fix.

 

If you do go diesel, check the trucks payload. On a 3/4 ton, it can be in the 2,300 lb range vs over 3K for gas. Honestly, if I wanted diesel, it'd be 1 ton only.

 

 

This brings up a question that I have. A lot of people say how you have to load a diesel.. they don't like to be commuter vehicles, etc etc. If you aren't towing, the engine won't be happy, etc etc.

 

I can't help but thinking this is maybe an old school way of thinking? I know many people that have diesels in their trucks and commute with them and road trip them (unloaded) all the time. Granted, in my case, I have a 60 mile round trip, so it's not quite as bad as the guy doing 10 miles. I'm more talking about the towing/loading of the engine.

 

It just seems that with modern engines and technology, a diesel should have no problem running mostly unloaded, with some weekend towing. With the advanced fuel systems, computer controlled injection, large improvements in fuel economy, why would an internal combustion engine be harmed by having light work?

Posted

That's kind of what I'm banking on. Hopefully GM is building these engines knowing that most of us are weekend warriors. I want a vehicle that will get me from Cincinnati to Yellowstone without trouble, but I also want a vehicle that will get my daughter to preschool 10 minutes down the road every morning. I hope this is it. I plan on making my purchase in the next week or two. I'll post my first impressions after that.

  • Like 1
Posted

The concern is when the motor doesn't heat up enough to burn off the blow by in the oil. Oil becomes acidic and eats away at things. Also it tends to gum up the valves when not hot. Difference is that a gas motor will heat up pretty quickly and a diesel won't. Leave either idling in the driveway and the gas will get up to temp, and the diesel will not.

 

Now mine was a 2001 so things may be different now, but I do know mine would puff black for a few minutes when I pushed it after not towing it for a month or so. In the winter, it would be worse as I would never get to normal operating temps. My commute is about 2.5 miles and the truck just couldn't warm up in the winter at all. I'd have to go for a drive just to get the truck warmed up.

 

I loved my diesel for towing. I just don't tow enough for it to make sense for me.

Posted

You'll be fine driving unloaded. 90% of folks that spread the negative info about diesels have never driven one. I just did the same thing as you're contemplating. Had a 1500 sierra, bought a 7k dry/10k gvwr toy hauler, and decided to jump into a duramax denali. It's awesome, i've had it for about a month and have no complaints (except for the crap stock "rancho" shocks, which i dumped for bilstein 5100s).

Posted

The concern is when the motor doesn't heat up enough to burn off the blow by in the oil. Oil becomes acidic and eats away at things. Also it tends to gum up the valves when not hot. Difference is that a gas motor will heat up pretty quickly and a diesel won't. Leave either idling in the driveway and the gas will get up to temp, and the diesel will not.

 

Now mine was a 2001 so things may be different now, but I do know mine would puff black for a few minutes when I pushed it after not towing it for a month or so. In the winter, it would be worse as I would never get to normal operating temps. My commute is about 2.5 miles and the truck just couldn't warm up in the winter at all. I'd have to go for a drive just to get the truck warmed up.

 

I loved my diesel for towing. I just don't tow enough for it to make sense for me.

 

 

I appreciate your info... I guess my response would be that the average commute (at least in a city) is much more than 2.5 miles, your situation is not typically the norm. With a commute that short, it will have negative effects on the engine, gas or diesel... diesel more so.

 

I guess from my perspective, I will drive it like any other vehicle, I will do regular maintenance, I'll run a grille cover in the winter, and I won't lose any sleep over it. My neighbor has a 1 ton as a daily driver and couldn't be happier. Has had it for 2 1/2 years here in central MN.

Posted

Bear,

 

Congrats on the Jay Flight 27 BHS!!! Yes, we may be a little partial to Jayco as we have a 32 BHDS. :) The yellow sticker in the tt that shows the weight as it rolled off the assembly line does include the full propane tanks weight, but I still can't find info as to if it includes the battery weight. I was referring to the brochure weights as they can be very misleading. From what I have found, the brochure weights don't even include the weight of options, even those options which are "mandatory".

 

As I understand the yellow payload sticker that is in the drivers door jamb does not include a driver, but think (haven't found any confirmation) that the yellow payload stickers does state the rated payload with a full tank of fuel. The yellow sticker states : "ALL OCCUPANTS and cargo not to exceed: XXXXlbs". All occupants means all of the drivers weight needs to be counted as well.

 

Now if you are referring to the tow rating, that did include 1-150lb driver, but as I understand with the new tow rating now includes 2-150lb occupants in the truck, with a 10% tw.

 

Hope all goes well with buying the new truck!!! Keep us posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...