Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nasty said:

It's your turn

I know I keep saying I'm gonna do it and I will eventually! ?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I added this same post to the lowering thread. 

 

So when I originally put the flip kit in I had the rear hangers set at the 6'' position and used my 2'' drop shackles to raise it back up to 5''.  I decided 5'' was low enough in the rear and wanted to to get the drop shackles replaced with the stock shackles, so  lowered the hanger to the 5'' spot and put the factory shackle back in.  

 

Now it in theory it shouldn't have changed the rear drop, since both were set to 5'', but I feel like the truck is sitting an inch higher in not only the back, but also the front now.  I'm pretty sure it's only in my head, and I measured from floor to fender and I'm 34'' front and 35'' rear,  and I could have sworn I was 33"/34" last week.  

 

Either I'm going crazy or now I want it lower, But the front seems awfully high now.  I'll take it out tomorrow and take another side shot pic in the same spot in my driveway as I previously did.  

 

Here's how it sits now 

 

truckcargarage.thumb.jpg.32e2fb212c9eb701dfb43b0d7b2cd1de.jpg

Edited by qwank
Posted

It's all in my head, it appears to be the same.  I tilted the camera a little this time so it doesn't look like I'm going uphill.  

 

trucksun.thumb.JPG.13cb93e31fbb7e290fc237ee7f42f94a.JPGtrucck2.thumb.jpg.170d0615c45b581562dcf17ba11f9788.jpg

Posted

Beautiful truck.  So, if I followed your thread correctly, all said and done, you're at a 3/5?  I just bought a 2017 1500 LT Crew Cab with 22's.......can't decided between a 3/5 and a 4/6.  I like the 4/6, but don't want any rubbing issues.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, ajacobazzi said:

Beautiful truck.  So, if I followed your thread correctly, all said and done, you're at a 3/5?  I just bought a 2017 1500 LT Crew Cab with 22's.......can't decided between a 3/5 and a 4/6.  I like the 4/6, but don't want any rubbing issues.

It's supposed to be 4/5, but I'm not sure I got a full 2'' out of the drop spindles. I never measured everything exactly before and after.  

 

 

EDIT: Looks like I'm closer to 3.5/5 

Edited by qwank
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

2800 miles.

 

took the 10mm ring out of the right side shock and it got rid of the lean and both sides are the same height now.  

 

Also dropped the rear down to 6, so altogether I am pretty much 4/6 now.  Installed offset upper control arm bushings and set my alignment. 

 

  Did my second warranty oil change too since I had the truck in the shop.

 

46drop2.thumb.jpg.25e40fa47c4c89c92d2a0104832913fc.jpg

 

46drop3.thumb.jpg.0e8c05d6a803550cc42c1c4f42a25f12.jpg

 

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

2960 miles

 

OK, suspension is all sorted out, time to move on to something else.  Next up is the stereo system.  I have the I06 radio with UQ3 speakers. Non Bose obviously as it isn't available in regular cab. 

 

The stereo upgrades will be done in two phases. Phase one is new speakers and door sound deadening, and phase 2 will be DSP (going 4 way active), amps, subwoofers and cabin sound deadening.   

 

So I'm a huge Alpine fan and I've used them almost exclusively in every vehicle I own.  I also have a a collection of vintage Alpine radios and amps.  So I was excited when they came out with a custom fit speaker system for our trucks.  Only problem is I wasn't paying, 1000 bucks for them.

 

  A set of woofers and mids with the passive crossovers showed up for sale online for a fraction of the price of the kit, so I grabbed them and added some SPS tweeters I had already.  Since  I didn't get the custom dash brackets that hold the tweeters, I just flush mounted them into the door trim, which I think looks cleaner anyways.  I realized I didn't have any tweeter crossovers so I'll have to wait Until later this week to finish this up.  

 

Here's some pics so far: 

 

Alpine 8'' woofer next to the stock 6x9

 

alpinetruck1.thumb.jpg.bad7d631f283baa853eadefae24ba7b5.jpg

 

3'' mid next to the stock dash speaker:

 

alpinetruck2.thumb.jpg.431a0d6ec7ca82182771785b07105490.jpg

 

mounted in place:

 

alpinetruck3.thumb.jpg.61f49ad91d100d8c156ffe677220eb5c.jpg

 

Tweeter mounted in door. There's a mounting stud and bolt for the mirror in this area. I just cut the stud down to the bolt and had plenty of clearance:

 

alpinetruck5.thumb.jpg.1f91148784708cfca6b05b0dcccb8f3c.jpg

 

Doors. I didn't go crazy with the deadening this time. Usually I will cover the whole inner shell but it's a pain in the butt when I need to get back into the door later to replace window regulators and door actuators.  So I made sure all the bolts and nuts weren't covered and the openings were accessible still. The outer panel is covered as well between the door braces. (not shown) 

 

alpinetruck4.thumb.jpg.71f4a3bbbd6a15f61ccc26e80febb2e8.jpg

 

 

Edited by qwank
  • Like 1
Posted

Looking great qwank!!

  • Like 1
Posted

I need to start my audio. The stock crap sucks ass

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I bought this JL Microsub about a year ago, because it's compact and fits behind the seats and console perfectly. It's It's a powered sub rated 500w at 1/4 ohm which is kinda crazy. I'll probably be using still unless I decide to go with something with more power. 

 

DSC_0069.thumb.JPG.5008c9c162365876f358e855f0a34564.JPG

Edited by qwank
Posted
On 6/3/2018 at 6:18 PM, qwank said:

I bought this JL Microsub about a year ago, because it's compact and fits behind the seats and console perfectly. It's 500w at 1/4 ohm which is kinda crazy. I'll probably be using still unless I decide to go with something with more power. 

 

DSC_0069.thumb.JPG.5008c9c162365876f358e855f0a34564.JPG

.25 ohm? You may have that mixed up.  Any (store bought) amps aremt stable at that.    Maybe the writing internally is wired like that but you will send your amp into protection 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Nasty said:

.25 ohm? You may have that mixed up.  Any (store bought) amps aremt stable at that.    Maybe the writing internally is wired like that but you will send your amp into protection 

Nope,  copied right from JL's website:

 

Amplifier power: Built-in DCD™ Class D amplifier (500 W @ 0.20 Ω)
Nominal Impedance: 0.20 Ω

Posted
1 minute ago, qwank said:

Nope,  copied right from JL's website:

 

Amplifier power: Built-in DCD™ Class D amplifier (500 W @ 0.20 Ω)
Nominal Impedance: 0.20 Ω

That's crazy.  That super low impedance.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Nasty said:

That's crazy.  That super low impedance.  

I know. The subs are actually 0.4 ohms each, wired to 0.2 ohms. 

 

 

ACP208LG-W3v3

Amplified Subwoofer System with Dual 8W3v3-0.40 Subwoofer Drivers, Built-In 500W Class D Amplifier, Black Carpet - Ported Enclosure



 

http://www.jlaudio.com/acp208lg-w3v3-car-audio-microsub-amplified-subwoofer-systems-93331

Edited by qwank
Posted
3 minutes ago, qwank said:

I know. The subs are actually 0.4 ohms each, wired to 0.2 ohms. 

 

 

ACP208LG-W3v3

Amplified Subwoofer System with Dual 8W3v3-0.40 Subwoofer Drivers, Built-In 500W Class D Amplifier, Black Carpet - Ported Enclosure



 

http://www.jlaudio.com/acp208lg-w3v3-car-audio-microsub-amplified-subwoofer-systems-93331

Now I understand. It's a built in amplifier. Because every jl amp I've seen is no lower than 2 ohm.  But its built in.  Got it now. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...