Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a little confused . In TSB # 15829 It says it covers 2014 models and in the other TSB #PI1513A it says the 2014 are not covered ?

TSB #1513 is on 2014

TSB#1513A is on 2015 powertrain warranty

#15829 special coverage is on 2014 5year 100000 miles

not sure if the special coverage supersedes the #1513

Posted (edited)

just an FYI. not all 2014 trucks are included.

 

my 2014 gmc 1500 with 37500 miles has the smell also. Was at the dealer 1/26/17. Was told radiator is the issue. 1200.00 repair to replace radiator and thermostat, coolant ect.

long story short mine was assembled in mexico and is not included in a tsb. or special coverage for radiator leak. REALLY!!!

I'm really surprised the radiator isn't part of the drive train warranty. That's nuts.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by Tom Boswell
Posted

Ok .. Thanks Ron .. Im going to bring this up next time I take it in for a oil change . I have noticed the coolant smell for some time now and it seems like the over flow bottle is slowly going down .

Posted

Isn't the radiator part of the drive train warranty?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I am told from 2 different dealers that its 3/36. Why im not sure why. #1513a for 2015 is powertrain. It feels like run around.

Posted

If for some reason it needs replaced I bought the extended warranty if for some reason they won't cover it under the TSB.

Posted

If for some reason it needs replaced I bought the extended warranty if for some reason they won't cover it under the TSB.

My want to have your dealer ck the vin to see if it is included in the TSB. I was charged $100.00 for diagnostics to verify it was the radiator. Cause mine was not u.s. Assembled. Funny thing is I was told Before I even dropped the truck off it was powertain warranty. it's a long story.

Posted

This is the answer I got from gmc customer service. Truly Ridiculous.

The letter that I received back in November stated that if I already got my radiator fix somewhere else I can get refunded the money from GM I no longer have the letter anymore

Posted

The letter that I received back in November stated that if I already got my radiator fix somewhere else I can get refunded the money from GM I no longer have the letter anymore

I was told to keep my receipts and if gm decided to include other vin's than I could be reimbursed. (must be done by gmc dealer) the special coverage is only a couple months old.

Posted

Dang it whomever bought my 2014 that I traded in has this problem (sorry dude whomever you are) it would steam a bit from under the front of the hood at times. Dealer said it was NORMAL they just added a bit of antifreeze at oil change time as needed LOL. These forums are great you can find out all kinds of stuff if you search around a bit.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I have a 2014 regular cab Z71 and I have smelled coolant and noticed a slow drain from the reservoir tank for some time . I didn't receive the letter that some of you did and my dealership service dept. said there was nothing on this issued for my truck according to my vin. I gave her the TSB number that was on this thread . She called today and said the radiator was leaking after a pressure test and that they replaced the radiator and thermostat . So for everyone who has smelled coolant but didn't get a letter you prolly still could have this issue.

Edited by 355HP Z71
  • 2 months later...
Posted

been smelling coolant now for some time. 45k miles and late 14 model. Ill call the dealership tomorrow but in the meantime is it possible to see this on my own? I went out with a flashlight and looked in the upper corners and didn't see any different stain color but I also dont know if its possible to see it from in front of the grill.

Posted

I have a 15 Sierra that had coolant smell. Had radiator replaced a month or two ago. Never saw and cracks or leaks. Dealer said it was leaking. Mine was due to thermostat.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I bought a used 2014 Silverado, noticed the coolant smell since I purchased it. I finally found this information about the radiator and TSB 15829. I called GM customer service and was told my VIN was not affected. Took the truck to the dealer I never mentioned the TSB, so I do not know if they are aware of it or not. So after checking it they told me the radiator was leaking where the head meets the tubes like the TSB states, they told me since I was out of the 3/36 it would be $1200 to replace the the just radiator. I called GM customer service back opened a case and demanded that they have someone go out to verify whether my truck has the same issue covered by the TSB. Was told a senior adviser would contact me in 48 hours (still waiting on the call). Within 45 minutes of the call to GM the dealer called me back and stated GM contacted them and told them if I paid a $500 deductible GM would cover the rest.

 

I thought it was fair half price, but point being if your told your not covered it may be worth it to complain to GM and open a case you may be able to do better. Them making that offer tells me they know the problem affects more vehicles, and lets face it by taking the deal it saves them from reimbursing the $1200 if and when they include other vehicles like mine. Of course i'm sure I forfeit the reimbursement of the $500 by doing this. Oh and by the way mine was made in Mexico.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
    • Rockauto bud. I pass local stores for parts.   Findya something online. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...