Jump to content

WARNING SCAMMER IN MARKETPLACE


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I remember complaining about the minimum post count requirement before being able to sell on the other forum. It makes sense... It may not prevent scams but will certainly slow them down or think twice about trying. Sucks for any new members who come to the forum who legitimately want to sell their stuff. I guess it's like ebay feedback rating. I think twice about buying from someone with 0 feedback versus the opposite.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Thank you everyone for the suggestions. I've implemented a 100-post minimum before a member can start a thread or reply to a thread in this forum going forward.

Posted

Thank you everyone for the suggestions. I've implemented a 100-post minimum before a member can start a thread or reply to a thread in this forum going forward.

I see why you don't want someone selling with less than 100 posts but you can't sell to someone that has less than 100 posts?

Posted

I see why you don't want someone selling with less than 100 posts but you can't sell to someone that has less than 100 posts?

 

A buyer could PM the seller.

Posted

 

A buyer could PM the seller.

 

Mudd, perhaps Zane can make it 100 posts just to access the Classifieds to even see them.

 

Thank you everyone for the suggestions. I've implemented a 100-post minimum before a member can start a thread or reply to a thread in this forum going forward.

 

Zane, that's also assuming no one "spams" their way to 100 posts with meaningless drivel?

Posted

It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. We can't please everyone, but we can do what we can to prevent this from happening again

Posted

 

Mudd, perhaps Zane can make it 100 posts just to access the Classifieds to even see them.

 

 

You do that and you kill the classified section. It becomes non searchable in Google. The only buyers left are current active members that have been here for a long time, a fraction of the audience you can sell to right now. That does not sit well with paying site sponsors you want to keep paying the bills.

Posted

You do that and you kill the classified section. It becomes non searchable in Google. The only buyers left are current active members that have been here for a long time, a fraction of the audience you can sell to right now. That does not sit well with paying site sponsors you want to keep paying the bills.

Correct. As of now, everyone can see it. If they don't have the minimum, pm is available.

Posted

You do that and you kill the classified section. It becomes non searchable in Google. The only buyers left are current active members that have been here for a long time, a fraction of the audience you can sell to right now. That does not sit well with paying site sponsors you want to keep paying the bills.

There are a number of ways to sell stuff if you don't have the 100 post count, ebay, craigslist, letgo, etc. This is just another avenue to help fellow members if I am not mistaken. I am not aware of any any site sponsors that use the FS section to conduct business, but maybe I am wrong.

Posted

We wee members should be able to sell our stuff in a section separate from that available to site sponsors.

And vice versa.

 

JMO

Posted

On F150forum every picture in a for sale post had to have the date and the sellers username. This stops people from pulling google images and claiming them as their own.

 

Pictures were required in ALL for sale posts none of that "I'm trying to figure out how to post" bs. If you can't figure out how to post a picture, you probably shouldn't be doing sales over the internet.

 

I was amazed on this forum how people were able to post items for sale with no picture and less than 100 posts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

On F150forum every picture in a for sale post had to have the date and the sellers username. This stops people from pulling google images and claiming them as their own.

 

Pictures were required in ALL for sale posts none of that "I'm trying to figure out how to post" bs. If you can't figure out how to post a picture, you probably shouldn't be doing sales over the internet.

 

I was amazed on this forum how people were able to post items for sale with no picture and less than 100 posts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In 16 years this is the first big issue we have had

Posted

I'm glad I didn't take the bait on any of those posts. Saw them and was tempted! Finally, being cheap has paid off! What a piece of scum... I hope law enforcement gets involved so there is more than just a slap on the wrist from PayPal.

Posted

After some suggestions, I've lowered the minimum post amount to 50. We'll be moving to a newer version of the forum software soon which will allow us to refine how the marketplace works going forward. We want to keep it open as much as possible. As mentioned before, lock it down too much and we're going to shoot ourselves in the foot.

 

Thank you everyone for your comments and patience.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,034 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...