Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Trying to get an idea what my 2017 LT would look like with 285's on it with my stock 18's

 

Called a local shop and they told me to go with there 2.5" Open country front and back lift. $600 installed with alignment.

 

Thinking:

 

285/65/18 BFG

275/70/18 BFG

 

Please post your photos

 

Thank you

Posted

285 65 18 nitto g2 bilstein lvl shocks on max height. I can get different angles if you want something specific 012a9ffb79a60ba77cd59ae832297e06.jpg2f85ebf39522641019da52d9067cb710.jpgf6a7dd15ac6a39197f05abf90956118e.jpg

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk

Posted

Here's mine with 275/65-18 with 1" front end lift. 285/65-18 is only 1/2" taller and 3/8" wider, so you are looking at 1/4" radius taller. All the 285/65's I found were LT, I wanted to stay with a P-Rated tire. Picture in my signature is side shot, couldn't find it on the computer, might have gotten deleted. This picture shows the air dam trimmed also.

post-139324-0-48144000-1494930522_thumb.jpg

post-139324-0-48144000-1494930522_thumb.jpg

post-139324-0-48144000-1494930522_thumb.jpg

post-139324-0-48144000-1494930522_thumb.jpg

Posted
Recently I added 285/65R18 BFG KO2's to my 2014 Silverado.
I installed Bilstein 5100's up front on the highest setting.
I did the teardown of the stock coilovers but I had a local shop swap the shocks out in the coilovers for $75.00. Installation in the truck was super easy.
Have absolutely no rubbing on the felt or sway bar.
I removed the front airdam thing just cause it sucks.
Speaking of sucking; I still have the craptastic RanchoMcNuts on the rear. I need to get to get to that soon.
I purchased 3" lift blocks along with the longer Bilstein rear shocks but haven't installed them yet. Been too busy.

2014 Tungsten Z71 LTZ. 285/65R18 BFG KO2 with Bilstein 5100  on highest setting

2014 Tungsten Z71 LTZ. 285/65R18 BFG KO2 with Bilstein 5100

 

You can't go wrong with 285/65R18 BFG's and Bilsteins.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

275/65 18 K02 less that a 1/2 inch difference in width but a few pounds lighter

 

5d0245df7ff0ca6f153108640c81b277.jpgabc465e58856bb97b8a52329f757a8d2.jpg0dec38474235ce0b351dc3b69c0ac7c7.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Trying to get an idea what my 2017 LT would look like with 285's on it with my stock 18's

 

Called a local shop and they told me to go with there 2.5" Open country front and back lift. $600 installed with alignment.

 

Thinking:

 

285/65/18 BFG

275/70/18 BFG

 

Please post your photos

 

Thank you

This sounds like a decent price for a front and back level/lift! With this amount of lift you could fit a larger tire or with less lift you could still fit the sizes you are considering. Be cautious of the argument that one size is only a "1/2 inch" taller or wider than another size. This variation can make a significant visual difference. Saving money and/or weight by choosing a size smaller than you truly want may make no difference to the casual onlooker but it will bother you for a long time! Ask me how I know!

Edited by Donstar
Posted

 

285/65r18 is the largest you can go with stockers on a 2.5 level without fear of rub. I'm running 275/65r18 and all I can advise on that is don't get this size, especially in BFGs that tend to run narrow anyway. Way too small a tire on a leveled truck.

 

285s look just OK, but still a little small. They look a little better in Nitto and Cooper because BFGs have a very narrow treadwidth and sidewalls with little bulge (section width). The 295/70 looks incredible, but on stockers you are going to rub UCA and Swaybar at full lock if you can live with that and KO2 don't come in that size. You can get away from rub with about a +6 offset or a 1" spacer if you want to cut your studs.

 

Sounds cheesy, but I am so torn over this issue because I don't want a bro-dozer but I also don't want to go 285 and be disappointed for 3 years like I am with my 275s.

 

I'm considering the new Falken AT3W in 305/65r18 as there is at least one truck on this forum running that with a level and claiming no rubbing. I care way more about width as seen coming and going rather than 1/2" taller side profile.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,782
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Newest Member
    ShowMeShooter1332
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 5,765 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I was around and remember that era very well, so I'm calling b/s on that statement. If they were that bad no police department or taxi company would've bought a single one ... but they were used in both services (and fire) for DECADES. They were bulletproof and proven. Even the early 21st century ones weren't too bad! The early models were legendary.   Mine is proof, but people like atlas are blinded by agenda and refuse to believe facts right before their very eyes.   Even decades after they were built, a new generation started driving them, posting all their builds and shenanigans on Grandmarq.net and Crownvic.net. The failures would show up then, since they all were deep past 100k-150k miles by that point, and younger drivers tend to be a little aggressive, especially with vehicles than can lay a one-tire fire for as long as you hold your foot in it. They've more than proven themselves over the decades.   The only thing that'll really take them out is road salt. The bodies and sheet metal were garbage. A victim of the cheapout FoMoCo and GM have been partaking in before then, and since.   Today it's the stuff that counts - the undercarriage that rots away first!    GMs Caprice was no slouch either. Reliable as a stone ax - the opposite of what they build now.    
    • Let me know how your vehicles do in 10 years. You don't know ******, kid. 😂    There's a reason that Panther platform was used as police, fire, and taxi service for DECADES ... long before you were born, apparently.
    • If your connector also has a big lever to get the connector on and off, you don't want to force the lever either way, as it becomes a bigger problem if you bust the lever or the mechanism it works.
    • It's just useful to disconnect the battery to prevent odd shorting out when unplugging/plugging stuff together.  I also  touch the two cable ends together (after disonnecting) to drain the small amount of stored battery energy in various modules.   I believe the main system where you need to be more concerned with, so you need to do the above and then wait some time, iss when you are working on the air bag system, to prevent inadvertent firing of the air bags.   The in-cab switches are just that, plain switches, it's generally not a problem to swap them in/out.  For my '12, I'll get an error message on the dash if I power up the truck w them unplugged, but that's it (power up= turn the ignition on).   The ITBC located above the spare tire is a computer that manages the trailer brake system.  That is probably more important to have the battery disconnected.  It does have to be programmed to the truck, either before or after it's installed, for it to work.  For my '12, I had a very hard time reinstalling the main connector to it (IDK if yours is the same or not), it turned out the silicon seal was jamming up, preventing it from going on all the way.  I finally got it fully installed by lubing the seal with a bit of dielectric grease, then it slid on and latched in place easily.
    • JR ! I just got the truck back from the Dealership today . The technician did a cold remote start on the truck this morning and it made the noise . It was determined that it was a starter issue and replaced it under warranty . Of course   it did not make the sound after a new starter was put in because the truck was not cold . We will we see what happens tomorrow morning when I start the truck cold  . Keep tuned !   Oh I found a video on YouTube of a cold start and it did the same thing your truck and mine do , I will see if I can find it and post it up
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...