Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

i bought my ridge grapplers right before they came out with the new sizes. i would love to have been able to get the 35x11.5. thats ok. once i wear these out i may take the level kit off and do a proper 4" lift and put 35's.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Well lets see if hes telling the truth, my tires and wheels will be here hopefully next week. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, 14tungstenLT said:

What are specs on those wheels and tires? 

 

4 minutes ago, 14tungstenLT said:

What are specs on those wheels and tires? 

Wheels are 18x9 on 295/70/18

Posted
On 8/20/2017 at 12:25 PM, 6TEEN5.3 said:

Do you have a tune? The only reason I got 33s is because I was told 35s would kill my 3.43 rear end. How's the loss off power?

I have the 3.43 gears in my 2015, and I don't have any issues with 35's on my truck. I also do not tow anything, but normal driving it is just as responsive. In my opinion this is not as much of an issue on the newer vehicles as is was on older trucks. 

Posted
6 hours ago, 14tungstenLT said:

backspace/offset? 

I wanna say either 4.5 or 5 I think! Don’t remember off hand

Posted

Well i have a 285/65 R20 on stock 20's on a 2.5 inch front level, and a 2 inch rear level with very little rub.  The rub is so minimal in fact that i hardly ever notice it.  You can see the extreamly little difference between the 35 x 12.5 vs the 285/65 R20.  Also provided some picks.

 

  285/65-20 35/12.5-20 Difference
Diameter inches (mm) 34.59 (878.5) 35.02 (889.6) 0.44 (11.1) 1.3%
Width inches (mm) 11.22 (285) 12.52 (318) 1.3 (33) 11.6%
Circum. inches (mm) 108.66 (2759.89) 110.03 (2794.76) 1.37 (34.87) 1.3%
Sidewall Height inches (mm) 7.29 (185.25) 7.51 (190.8) 0.22 (5.55) 3%
Revolutions per mile (km) 583.12 (362.33) 575.84 (357.81) -7.28 (-4.52) -1.2%

 

 

gallery_163014_4656_1120329.jpggallery_163014_4656_841832.jpggallery_163014_4656_5360358.jpg

  • Like 2
  • 9 months later...
Posted

Hey all. I used this forum for my purchase so wanted to give input. Have a 17 Sierra with a 2.5 RC level. I was able to fit 275/65/R20 BFG KO2s easily with zero rub. Not sure you could go any bigger w/o lots of trimming. 

05BC3D09-CCAC-4FD6-86DD-4CC2857E9407.jpeg

Posted
3 hours ago, Tada said:

Hey all. I used this forum for my purchase so wanted to give input. Have a 17 Sierra with a 2.5 RC level. I was able to fit 275/65/R20 BFG KO2s easily with zero rub. Not sure you could go any bigger w/o lots of trimming. 

05BC3D09-CCAC-4FD6-86DD-4CC2857E9407.jpeg

looks good!!! How much has the ride changed?

  • 5 months later...
Posted

3.5” level with 35x12.50 stock 20’s. 1/4” wheel spacers in the front. Nothing in the back. Only rub a little bit when reversing on uneven surface. No trimming done either. It can be done but would only do it on stocks because of offset issues on other rims. You would rub a lot more if I wasn’t on stocks. 

4A9ECA71-3C37-4BA2-A1CC-433BAF69F4B1.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 9/21/2017 at 4:51 AM, THE_Engineer said:

Yes you can fit a 12.50 wide tire. You will scrub the sway bar at full lock but its easy to avoid and there was defiantly a big height change with the tires.

Why can’t I see the pictures. Smh

  • 6 months later...
Posted

They will fit. I have a 2018 Sierra with a motofab 2.5 inch leveling kit. With some minor trimming I was able to put Nitto Terra Grapplers 35 x 12.5 x 20s on and the only time it rubs is when I am backing out of a parking space at full lock. I wish I had a picture but I have had the tires on for maybe a year now and have had zero issues other than some minor rubbing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...