Jump to content

Fuel


Mervkirwin

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just purchased a 2017 GMC Sierra SLT All Terrain with the 6.2 L , I see in the manual it states to use 93 Octane in the truck for better fuel mileage and performance. Does anyone know if this is true and have you noticed better gas mileage.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

GM will always suggest to use top tier fuels no matter what. In my 5.3 I've only ever run 87-89 and it runs fine. MPG average on the DIC shows 29.1

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

If I remember right, I have read where some 6.2 owners accidentally put in regular 87 or equivalent and the engine didn't seem to run right. The 6.2 is tuned to run on premium so that's what you should run. Sure it will run on a lower octane if you're in a pinch, but I wouldn't recommend it and just stick with premium. I also never use any mom and pop store to fill up. Always a top tier brand or just well a known brand.

Posted

As you already know: The octane scale is the opposite of what most people think. The higher the octane, the lower the combustibility. So low octane fuels can produce more power (theoretically). Why do we put high octane fuel in race cars and high performance engines? High performance engines need to have less volatile fuel to keep the engine from exploding. Some of the fastest cars on earth run on alcohol, which is obviously less explosive than gasoline. Running too low of octane could be looked at like this: Your running a fuel that is too powerful for your engine. The volatile fuel will detonate too early, and cause random explosions inside your engine. Your engine tries to compensate for the unplanned explosions by retarding the timing. You want your engine to run in its ideal environment, so that it will be efficient and last as long as it can. Save pennies at the pump to destroy your engine. If you really want to use cheap gas, just "cut" it with something to lower the octane. When we raced bikes competitively, all the well known national guys ran a mix of pump fuel and airplane fuel. The airplane fuel was very high octane. What ever your rig calls for, use that.

Posted

High octane top tier fuel is cheap insurance to keep your motor happy. The timing is adjusted on the fly by the engines computer and higher octane allows for more timing advance. Timing advance adds power and efficiency, but only up to the point where the engine can tolerate it.

Posted

If I had a 6.2, I wouldn't run anything less then 91 octane. With my ScanGauge monitoring timing and KR (knock retard), I have witnessed first had the affects of lower octane on my 5.3. I try use at least 89 and will occasionally use 91 if the price is right. Since the 6.2 has a higher compression (11.5:1 vs 11:1) using anything less then 91 will most likely result in KR and timing be retarded (aka loss of power).

Posted

GM will always suggest to use top tier fuels no matter what. In my 5.3 I've only ever run 87-89 and it runs fine. MPG average on the DIC shows 29.1

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

29.1......i haven't seen that good on my yet. You must be keeping it below 30mph all the time.... :lurk:

Posted

29.1......i haven't seen that good on my yet. You must be keeping it below 30mph all the time.... :lurk:

Maybe he's using km.

Posted

As you already know: The octane scale is the opposite of what most people think. The higher the octane, the lower the combustibility. So low octane fuels can produce more power (theoretically). Why do we put high octane fuel in race cars and high performance engines? High performance engines need to have less volatile fuel to keep the engine from exploding. Some of the fastest cars on earth run on alcohol, which is obviously less explosive than gasoline. Running too low of octane could be looked at like this: Your running a fuel that is too powerful for your engine. The volatile fuel will detonate too early, and cause random explosions inside your engine. Your engine tries to compensate for the unplanned explosions by retarding the timing. You want your engine to run in its ideal environment, so that it will be efficient and last as long as it can. Save pennies at the pump to destroy your engine. If you really want to use cheap gas, just "cut" it with something to lower the octane. When we raced bikes competitively, all the well known national guys ran a mix of pump fuel and airplane fuel. The airplane fuel was very high octane. What ever your rig calls for, use that.

 

Mostly agree. However, it was recently pointed out to me that all the gasoline has the same specific energy (BTU, joules, etc). The "octane" ratings are now controlled with primarily anti-knock additives. A reference was cited and I did read a article supporting that. But there was a time that high octane was lower specific energy fuel
Posted

I have also ran into this because in my spare time I like to fix up old 2 stroke street bikes. Back in the 60's and early 70's these bikes ran on regular pump gas but the octane reading back then is much higher in reality than what it is today. To counter this I mix non-ethanol 93 with 100 octane racing fuel (the racing fuel has ethanol so I don't like to run it straight). On my more modern motorcycle (large air cooled V-Twin) I run the lowest octane gas I can get away with (bike requires 91 or higher octane) which means 87 in the winter, 89 in the spring and fall, and 93 in the heat of summer.

Posted

If I had a 6.2, I wouldn't run anything less then 91 octane. With my ScanGauge monitoring timing and KR (knock retard), I have witnessed first had the affects of lower octane on my 5.3. I try use at least 89 and will occasionally use 91 if the price is right. Since the 6.2 has a higher compression (11.5:1 vs 11:1) using anything less then 91 will most likely result in KR and timing be retarded (aka loss of power).

Black Bear Performance informed me to run at least 89 in our 5.3 even if it wasn't tuned. They said these new engines benefit from higher octane and running anything lower isn't recommended by them from what they are seeing when tuning the 5.3 and 6.2.

Posted

I have a 5.3, and live in Mexico, we only have 87 and 91.

 

I wouldn't dare putting Mexican 87 on my truck,

 

I hate the fact that I can only have Pemex fuel. Damn Socialism :(

 

All hail free market

Posted

Octane usage is based on compression ratios and timing curves. 5.3 liter can use 87 octane because of it's compression ratio of 9.5 to 1, whereas a 6.2 liter (L86) runs 11.5 to 1 compression ratio. That is why the manufacturer recommends higher octane fuel.

 

Another little factoid, the 10% ethanol blends are great for cold winter start ups but recommended in very hot Arizona weather.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,866
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Greg3160
    Newest Member
    Greg3160
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 390 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Late reply, but yes—it works on the SLT trim. Compatibility comes down to the plastic shroud shape behind your mirror, not the trim badge itself. On the SLT with auto-dimming, it uses a plug-and-play Y-harness off the mirror/rain sensor power, so no need to run wires down to the OBD port. If anyone's ever unsure about fitment, just drop a photo of your mirror housing and we can double-check it.   Appreciate the detailed feedback on the install! On the windshield glare—we actually took feedback like yours and developed a dedicated CPL (polarizer) filter to cut down dash reflections on sunny days. If you're still running the cam, shoot me a DM. I'd be happy to send a CPL filter over for you to test out—no charge. 
    • There are no stickers in your glovebox?
    • Look at the numbers on the stickers in the door jam...
    • Yes, every time the developer updates his code, you must recompile. I will private message you with the latest because it changes pretty much with every version.
    • After I wrote that reply I went for a ride. 85 F out. So trans started at 85 F and it shifted the same as it did an hour latter at 168 F. I've never actually recorded the to cold to shift point but it is under 32 F before they start hanging on to a lower gear or leaving the converter unlocked. Both intended to heat fluid.    Yes, brake or bake. Absolutely.      Your welcome. True research ended decades ago. Field trials are still in play.    There is a thing called oxidation onset temperature. This is the heat related oxidation not the O2 exposure kind. For mineral oil that starts at 140 F. So what happens after 140 F? Each 20 F cuts fluid life in half! Does using a Full Synthetic improve that? Yes! By how much? Depends on the base oil type and a few other factors. But enough to notice. Some esters are even higher. There are even synergies between types the will raise it higher than any one component is alone.    Then there is "Hindered" oils. Antioxidant additives. Hindered Polyol Esters can sit at 500 F for years in a turbine.   When a blender brags his oil will 'take 500 F" in service he doesn't specify for how long. Water will dance on a 500 F hot plate for several seconds. @newdude put up a chart showing the relationship between fluid temperature and it's life in an automatic transmission. Here's a version of that chart for Group III based oils. These temperatures are those in the pan as observed as 'normal'. that is you drive as you do for as long as you do under what load you ask of it and whatever that temperature is this graph applies to. Flash temperatures of a few minutes isn't what his means.    Note that fluids held at a constant 240 F have a service life of only 20K miles. 220 F explains the factory exchange limit, eh? My equipment I keep under 180 F and I'm good if the cooler will hold it as low as 140 F. But that's me.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...