Jump to content

2018 2500HD Tire Replacement/Upgrade


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for all the replies and pictures.  Definitely lots to consider.

 

The 275/65/20 is about $60 cheaper than a 295/60/20 in the Nitto TG G2.  For that reason alone, it's a contender.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Thanks for all the replies and pictures.  Definitely lots to consider.
 
The 275/65/20 is about $60 cheaper than a 295/60/20 in the Nitto TG G2.  For that reason alone, it's a contender.

It’s also thinner tire.. keep that in mind too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
+2 ?  Level, spacers?  You lost me!

I was measuring +2 inches. Just looking at the offset difference.. plus 1/4” of wheel thickness. I’m deep into my fender liner.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 hours ago, Waaazooo said:


It’s also thinner tire.. keep that in mind too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

True...but, it's still wider than the stock tire.  And I believe the Super Duty trucks come stock with that size - or at least some of them do. 

 

Found this one that gives a pretty good idea of the look, maybe it's someone here on the forum:

 

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/wheel-offset-gallery/285009/2016-gmc-sierra-2500-hd-fuel-maverick-rough-country-leveling-kit

 

 

Posted
True...but, it's still wider than the stock tire.  And I believe the Super Duty trucks come stock with that size - or at least some of them do. 

 

Found this one that gives a pretty good idea of the look, maybe it's someone here on the forum:

 

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/wheel-offset-gallery/285009/2016-gmc-sierra-2500-hd-fuel-maverick-rough-country-leveling-kit

 

 

Stock 20” size for the HD is 265/60-20

Either way it will all fit

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
3 hours ago, Waaazooo said:

Stock 20” size for the HD is 265/60-20

Either way it will all fit

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

275/65/20 will need no less than a +18 offset to clear.  The +1 will not clear a 275/65/20 without some trimming. 

Posted

I think I have finally made up my mind...

Fuel Warriors 20x9, +20

Nitto Terra Grapplers G2 285/65/20

 

TIme to get things on order!

Posted
23 hours ago, sdeeter19555 said:

Just make sure the wheels are load rated...

2012 2500hd 6.0l CCSB 4wd


 

Good point  - they're rated at 3700# by the manufacturer.  Should be be a non-issue. 

Posted
Good point  - they're rated at 3700# by the manufacturer.  Should be be a non-issue. 

Well how did it turn out?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
14 hours ago, Waaazooo said:


Well how did it turn out?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Still a work in progress...a good friend of mine works at Discount Tire.  He's putting together a quote for me on Monday, hopefully I'll be able to get everything ordered then.

 

In the meantime, I need to get my keys adjusted to get a little more height out of the front end.  I'll make sure I get some pictures posted once everything is done!

Posted
Still a work in progress...a good friend of mine works at Discount Tire.  He's putting together a quote for me on Monday, hopefully I'll be able to get everything ordered then.
 
In the meantime, I need to get my keys adjusted to get a little more height out of the front end.  I'll make sure I get some pictures posted once everything is done!

Make sure you watch your cv angles. 6c7e21c89b1f496bd549b3e0d1ec68cf.jpg

Not the best picture angle, but I was told that the rubber ribs shouldn’t touch each other for best angles.8cb8e5c26f5581c56e0190d16eb09e42.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

That's a good point.  I won't be planning to go much more than 2" at most up front.  I don't want to completely eliminate the rake, but I certainly don't want to keep 3.5" of rake either.

 

I'm thinking at the same time I'll replace my Rancho shocks with either Bilstein or Fox shocks.  My 1500 had a leaky Rancho and to be honest, I don't love how they perform on the 2500 either.  We'll see.  Things like this start to get real expensive real quick.

Posted

Bilsteins ordered, shock spacers ordered a few days ago, starting to show up at the house already.

 

Wheels and tires ordered today. 

 

Fuel Warriors 20x9 +20

Nitto G2s 285/65/20

Posted
7 hours ago, cdh7917 said:

Bilsteins ordered, shock spacers ordered a few days ago, starting to show up at the house already.

 

Wheels and tires ordered today. 

 

Fuel Warriors 20x9 +20

Nitto G2s 286/65/20

Looking forward to seeing the pictures when you get everything installed!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • He is not saying that an SAE *W20 will have more viscosity than a *W40 due to MORE VII polymers. He is saying that although multiple *W40 may post in the PDS the same or similar 100 C and 150 C viscosities that the blenders choice of modifier TYPE and AMOUNT to get his chosen base to grade will not give identical real world viscosities in shear and at temperature. All will pass the SII test but not all will pass the 100 C HTHS (unpublished value) testing the blender does and relies on to get the required by law "percentage improvement' referenced to his last great work.    Tis the problem with the lie. Once told others are required to support it. 
    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...