Jump to content

6.2 LTS Motor worth the $$$$$$


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


GM’s 6.2 has been for many years the most powerful full size truck able to tow and carry more than all competitors and its only been recently that the competitors started coming out with competitive trucks. You’re going to be paying much more for a ford or dodge with that kinda power only cause ford only offers it in their raptor or Shelby and dodge the same thing, their new TRX performance truck but the key is towing capabilities too and not just speed and off-road capabilities. I’ve owned a huge amount of high dollar trucks and SUV’s, GM’s 6.2 is by far, today, best bang for your buck. Go get yourself one and you’ll never look back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The new Raptor has that damn 3.5L turbo 6 in it, even it's not an 8 anymore.  Meh.

 

I did take a gander at the Fords when I was looking just to see if they had some kind of smoking deal, but nope.  Even their "on sale" vehicles are too pricey for what you get, and their v-8 is still only that little 5.0 liter.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
20 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


GM’s 6.2 has been for many years the most powerful full size truck able to tow and carry more than all competitors and its only been recently that the competitors started coming out with competitive trucks. You’re going to be paying much more for a ford or dodge with that kinda power only cause ford only offers it in their raptor or Shelby and dodge the same thing, their new TRX performance truck but the key is towing capabilities too and not just speed and off-road capabilities. I’ve owned a huge amount of high dollar trucks and SUV’s, GM’s 6.2 is by far, today, best bang for your buck. Go get yourself one and you’ll never look back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A 35K Ford with a tiny 2.7 can match the 6.2 to 60mph you realize that right

Posted
The new Raptor has that damn 3.5L turbo 6 in it, even it's not an 8 anymore.  Meh.
 
I did take a gander at the Fords when I was looking just to see if they had some kind of smoking deal, but nope.  Even their "on sale" vehicles are too pricey for what you get, and their v-8 is still only that little 5.0 liter.


Exactly, you could get the coyote 5.0 412 HP and only 390 torque but even that’s more expensive than the GM 6.2 430 HP and 460 torque


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
A 35K Ford with a tiny 2.7 can match the 6.2 to 60mph you realize that right


Nope, last ford that raced me got demoted from that. Besides, been there, done that. They’re a dime a dozen and drive like one too. My neighbor has one of those platinums, complains of bad mpg’s and so so so much more. An aspirated motor blows away any little turbo in high elevations, did you know that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I’m not cheap by any stretch and I’m a HP junky. In my case in 2013 when I bought my 14 Texas Edition GMC 5.3 with E-85 option, The 40HP jump to 6.2 wasn’t worth the price difference. And only being able to use premium gas didn’t set well with me. Anyone who’s driven the 5.3 on E-85 can’t believe the difference. I’m a shopper too, I only paid 27K for a 40K truck.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Posted
6 hours ago, goose hunter said:

Hi guys and girls,

  I'm lining up to order a 19' and a few of my friends have a 6.2 and say they are great on gas and lot's of power.....just wanted a unbiased opinion from folks and this site. What's your take and input on the 6.2...here in Canada they're 4000$ more.

Thanks for reading...

                                                      GH

This is definitely a personal decision.  I would rather have an upgraded trim level with the base engine than a base truck with an upgraded engine.  If you can afford a higher trim level with an upgraded engine size then get it all!   

Posted
I’m not cheap by any stretch and I’m a HP junky. In my case in 2013 when I bought my 14 Texas Edition GMC 5.3 with E-85 option, The 40HP jump to 6.2 wasn’t worth the price difference. And only being able to use premium gas didn’t set well with me. Anyone who’s driven the 5.3 on E-85 can’t believe the difference. I’m a shopper too, I only paid 27K for a 40K truck.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Yes you are! Kidding, you’ve got to own one to know one brother. Be safe and God Bless!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Yes you are! Kidding, you’ve got to own one to know one brother. Be safe and God Bless!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’ve drove plenty, my dealer had 13 left over Denali’s. Funny thing is most if not all 6.2s on dealers lots have reg gas in them. That seriously detunes the 6.2 for KR. My salesman was driving a 5.3 on corn E-85. So the difference negligible. I don’t expect anyone who’s paid the premium for the 6.2 to do anything but pound their chest. It’s the people that done the research and bought the E-85 5.3s who are saying really you paid what for 40 HP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I’ve drove plenty, my dealer had 13 left over Denali’s. Funny thing is most if not all 6.2s on dealers lots have reg gas in them. That seriously detunes the 6.2 for KR. My salesman was driving a 5.3 on corn E-85. So the difference negligible. I don’t expect anyone who’s paid the premium for the 6.2 to do anything but pound their chest. It’s the people that done the research and bought the E-85 5.3s who are saying really you paid what for 40 HP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Well I had a 2014 5.3, added E85 and crap performance compared to my 6.2. Besides, you once told me you’re done buying new trucks and said your sticking to your old green machine, guess for this forums sake you went out and tested that bad boy 6.2 and it’s fuel octane. I’m not pounding my chest, no need to cause it’s bad ass and I’ve never ever heard a salesman try and sell me a 6.2, it’s not for every joe out there. You’ve got Trolls on a GM truck sight bringing up how ford eco boosts are better especially since they cost much less and yet they don’t even own one of those vehicles at that cheap price which should immediately prove cheap, envious and Trolling, it is what it is. GM 6.2 is well worth the price and always critics out there that eyeball something they can’t afford so they either cheapen a great motor with tons of awards or do it cause they can’t afford it and makes them feel more of a man/sheman/woman by cutting it down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I paid for that extra 40HP and torque because ain't nobody anywhere near here sells E85.  And while your at it, tell us what kind of mileage your getting on that stuff?

 

I'm not John Force, but I've spent many dollars and hours hotrodding and drag racing back in the day.  Alcohol has less BTU's per equal volume than gas, so to get that extra 25HP out of that 5.3, your dumping a lot more of it in (if you can find it in your area) and your mileage sucks.  Yeah, I get it, nobody buys a truck if they're concerned about mileage, but with fuel prices today, no reason to intentionally buy and run something that makes it worse.

 

Then again, when it comes to sell or trade time, I'll look at your 5.3 and say "you only got how much for it?"

Posted
1 hour ago, TXGREEK said:

 


Nope, last ford that raced me got demoted from that. Besides, been there, done that. They’re a dime a dozen and drive like one too. My neighbor has one of those platinums, complains of bad mpg’s and so so so much more. An aspirated motor blows away any little turbo in high elevations, did you know that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I think you got that the other way around. Naturally aspirated motors will take more of a performance hit at higher altitues than forced induction.

 

 

When I was making my purchasing decision I had two of the same Centennial edition trucks at different dealers. Same price, but one with the 5.3 and the other with the 6.2L. The 5.3 had a sunroof and parking sensors to make up for the difference in price. I'm so glad I choose the 6.2L. 

Posted


Well I had a 2014 5.3, added E85 and crap performance compared to my 6.2. Besides, you once told me you’re done buying new trucks and said your sticking to your old green machine, guess for this forums sake you went out and tested that bad boy 6.2 and it’s fuel octane. I’m not pounding my chest, no need to cause it’s bad ass and I’ve never ever heard a salesman try and sell me a 6.2, it’s not for every joe out there. You’ve got Trolls on a GM truck sight bringing up how ford eco boosts are better especially since they cost much less and yet they don’t even own one of those vehicles at that cheap price which should immediately prove cheap, envious and Trolling, it is what it is. GM 6.2 is well worth the price and always critics out there that eyeball something they can’t afford so they either cheapen a great motor with tons of awards or do it cause they can’t afford it and makes them feel more of a man/sheman/woman by cutting it down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

WOW touchy. I was replying to the OP with my opinion. Me being a thrifty person made it possible to retire at 58. So I show people alternatives. I have a fast truck it cost me 7500$ eight years ago. The difference between reasonable truck with the 5.3 or one with a 6.2. If I want a fast premium people hauler that gets great gas mileage I drive this. I got a good deal on this 7 years ago. It still has bumper to bumper warranty.1b5bd37d20cc689c55ad7303080a16ec.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I paid for that extra 40HP and torque because ain't nobody anywhere near here sells E85.  And while your at it, tell us what kind of mileage your getting on that stuff?
 
I'm not John Force, but I've spent many dollars and hours hotrodding and drag racing back in the day.  Alcohol has less BTU's per equal volume than gas, so to get that extra 25HP out of that 5.3, your dumping a lot more of it in (if you can find it in your area) and your mileage sucks.  Yeah, I get it, nobody buys a truck if they're concerned about mileage, but with fuel prices today, no reason to intentionally buy and run something that makes it worse.
 
Then again, when it comes to sell or trade time, I'll look at your 5.3 and say "you only got how much for it?"


I looooove my 6.2 ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

WOW touchy. I was replying to the OP with my opinion. Me being a thrifty person made it possible to retire at 58. So I show people alternatives. I have a fast truck it cost me 7500$ eight years ago. The difference between reasonable truck with the 5.3 or one with a 6.2. If I want a fast premium people hauler that gets great gas mileage I drive this. I got a good deal on this 7 years ago. It still has bumper to bumper warranty.1b5bd37d20cc689c55ad7303080a16ec.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Just stating a fact, I’m semi retired, never worked for anyone, not a thrifty person cause I enjoy my life and have no need for the obsolete. One thing is for certain, I don’t jump into conversations without having personal experience reviewing and yet sometimes I find it’s just not worth it especially when you’ve got people that just no matter what naturally like to argue and disagree. Cute car, yeah, you can squeeze everyone in there and save your money on gas. My neighbor has that same older Xfinity/Nissan sedan and uses it as an everyday beater back and forth to the airport, he’s a pilot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted


Just stating a fact, I’m semi retired, never worked for anyone, not a thrifty person cause I enjoy my life and have no need for the obsolete. One thing is for certain, I don’t jump into conversations without having personal experience reviewing and yet sometimes I find it’s just not worth it especially when you’ve got people that just no matter what naturally like to argue and disagree. Cute car, yeah, you can squeeze everyone in there and save your money on gas. My neighbor has that same older Xfinity/Nissan sedan and uses it as an everyday beater back and forth to the airport, he’s a pilot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really are something. That’s neither car you mentioned. Any farther conversion with is just a waste of time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an issue with a new 1985 Z-28 some years ago. The 4WDB's were less than adequate when purchased IMO.  I had taken it in for small warranty services and asked them on three occasions to check them. Each time is was "could not duplicate on the service ticket. The warranty ran out about a month after my last visit and had to take it back for warranty rework. I again complained about the brakes. Well, low and behold, this time they determined the rear calipers were sticking and gave me a quote to repair. They had records as well as O had receipts of each time complained about the brakes while still under warranty. My dad was a life long body shop owner and told me to keep my cool and tell them that I wanted to speak to the GM Regional District Manager. The service manager disappeared for a few minutes, came back and told me they would replace the calipers free of charge. 
    • Towing a 2022 Lance 24 ft travel trailer with our 2021 GMC Sierra 2500HD, gas.  Loaded, trailer is about 6,000 lb.  We get up to 10 mpg at 55 mpg, such as I-5.  Pleased with the combination.
    • I decided to give it a shot and see what sort of a gong show it would be to a pan drop themed oil change on my 2025 gas truck with the 10 speed. All indications I had seen so far was that there was no way that pan was coming out of there due to the cross over exhaust pipe not allowing enough clearance for the back end of the pan to duck out from under the valve body since it hangs lower than the pan to trans mount flange and certainly the filter does. I never touched any of the exhaust mount hardware at all, be that the engine manifolds to Y pipe, the bracket on the side of the transmission, or the two bolt flange further back behind the trans/transfer case. I put the truck up on four jack stands as there was no way I was going to struggle with that lack of clearance under the truck. The truck was cold as it had sat over night so all the trans fluid had drained to the pan, so I drained the bit of oil that would come out of the level check plug at the bottom near the front of the pan and put the plug back in to reduce the ensuing mess after that. Then took out all but one bolt front and rear and then pushed up on the pan and took out the remaining two bolts and then let the front of the pan tilt and spill out most of its contents into a drain pan. I then popped the pan gasket off its two locating nubs and kicked it a bit to the left side so it was no longer on the flange of the pan to get all the clearance I could and managed to get the pan slipped out of there by swinging the front of the pan to the right but keeping the rear part of the pan inline if not slightly to the left of its mounting flange area and lifting the front of the pan enough to keep the rear part of the pan low enough that allowed the pan to "JUST" slip out without forcing anything. I installed a new trans filter and seal and as per GM instructions on this site I torqued the two bolts to that 44 inch pound goal ( they take an 8 mm socket ) In reversing the pan procedure after I had cleaned up the pan both inside and out completely ( touching the outside of a dirty pan and dealing with installing a gasket at the same time would be a disaster ). First I slipped the pan into place and yes it took me a while as it won't go unless its slid in just at the right angles, then once the back of the pan was into the area of the flange mount, I went and got the gasket and then threaded that through the front of the pan and feeding it under the filter etc and finally working it onto the flange of the pan and lining up the two locating nubs to drop into the pan. Then lifted the pan up into place and get a couple of bolts started and check and make sure the gasket is where its supposed to be as the bolts were being put in. I never used any power tools as I don't have any of the whimsy little drive guns, I use what looks like a small screw driver handle with shank that has a 1/4 drive on the end of it and added an extension and those bolts use a 10 mm socket as some times power tools can bite a person if used on delicate parts ( torqued to 80 inch pounds ). Also should note as per rules around pulling the add plug out first, yes I cracked that loose with a 8 mm Allen bit socket on a 3/8 slim head ratchet as there isn't a lot of room to work with there either due to the exhaust on the right side of the trans.    I already had delco ULV oil on hand and of course the quart bottle pump wasn't made for those small cap threads so I had to use some other containers that the pump would fit and keep transferring oil over into them so a wasted exercise there but indeed the small pump did work just fine as ULV oil is thin and easy to pump in summer time weather. I put in 9.5 quarts as per prior minimum recommendation and yes that cut it pretty close as once I had the truck ( off the jack stands so its level ) and the trans oil up to 167f , about 6 ounces came out but a level kit or what have you could throw it off just enough that it wouldn't be enough oil so probably that 10 quarts is a good amount to put in so one doesn't have to add more oil as when its hot I sure wouldn't want to be adding oil so would have to let the exhaust cool. All I do for warming up the transmission is sit there with it in park and rev it to about 2500 rpm and it takes close to 20 minutes to get it up to that lower limit of 167f, weird how it will warm up more doing that then by driving it, I am not real keen on power braking the truck to get the temp up there and don't seem to have to either. By the way I only have 9000 miles on the truck so probably not a very good payback on doing it that soon and the magnets had such a minor thin layer of fines on them so that was good to see and the color of the oil was a darker red then new oil but still looked very good as it should and I've not done any towing with it so its been living a pretty easy life so far. The filter is made in such a way that its next to impossible to pull out the filter media but there certainly was some fines showing up there which makes sense give the trans having to break in.    I hadn't really planned on explaining this much of what I had done since there are various instruction videos kicking around or I think so, as the gist of my message as that by fluke or what have you, for some reason my truck has just enough clearance to slip the pan out from the trans. Of course there is no guarantee that other trucks like this in general will also allow the pan to be taken out without messing with the exhaust as I expect its probably a crap shoot if it will or won't, I was just happy to find out that mine would work and avoid all the other struggling and possibly damaging things in the process,     
    • Do you fellas think Fog Lamps would  be a good upgrade for our 2024 2500 HD Custom ? As you probably know it did not come with them ,  Would you put in GM Chevy parts ? Do they get wired up to the switch panel ( Upfitter or whatever the correct terminology is ) on the dash ? Thanks
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...