Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Castrol Edge & ACDELCO PF63

Protection for Too many Miles to count 

None added

 

Latest:

19 October 2025 Odometer: 74,502 (2,095 mi.)

[Total 2,268.9 (82 hrs)]

[Remaining 68%] (21.9 mpg) 

 

Previous

28 April 2025  Odometer: 72,407 (4,789 Interval)  [Total 2,186.9 Hrs]

[Remaining 31%] (21.5 mpg) 

20251019_150749.jpg

20251019_150759.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/22/2025 at 1:00 PM, PunchT37 said:

Here’s mine. 
 

image.thumb.jpg.0439ebe77c44eb0daf284e8a458ff1b9.jpg

Interesting.  3k miles and it sheered down? Fuel dilution test from Blackstone isn't very reliable.  Oil Analyzers would be a better choice and to my knowledge less in cost, especially if you are a Preferred Customer.  Every consider using them?

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

Interesting.  3k miles and it sheered down? Fuel dilution test from Blackstone isn't very reliable.  Oil Analyzers would be a better choice and to my knowledge less in cost, especially if you are a Preferred Customer.  Every consider using them?

Yeah. That got me thinking. Lab QC not there? I do a water lab so, there can be errors in lab work. I have stayed so far as to watch the copper trends without changing labs.

 

New 5.3 with fuel dilution? Hmm. I`m not buying that viscosity report. So, how bout the rest? Hmm. Copper should have come down by now. External oil cooler or not.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Yeah. That got me thinking. Lab QC not there? I do a water lab so, there can be errors in lab work. I have stayed so far as to watch the copper trends without changing labs.

 

New 5.3 with fuel dilution? Hmm. I`m not buying that viscosity report. So, how bout the rest? Hmm. Copper should have come down by now. External oil cooler or not.

 

Pretty rare for any GDI motor to not display some fuel dilution. Has to do with the fact that cold it doesn't vaporize the fuel, it atomizes it and the silly practice of over rich cold starts with really late ignition timing. A practice used to get the cats up to temperature quicker. Burning fuel in them. :mad: If you lab used GC instead of a 'crackle test' I'd expect you would see  a percent or so. 

 

Copper in Ecotec3 motors is not uncommon. Platform specific. Hemi's do this too. Pepper at 165K still showed about the same amount she did at 80K. I don't worry about it. She's nearing 200K and runs like top. Should have latest results some time this week. 

 

I don't know what oil you are using but shear down of the VM is absolutely possible in that short of time. What we considered a flaw a few decades ago in VM chemistry is now advertised as a 'Feature". One used to get enough viscosity driven fuel economy improvement into the 20 and 30 grade oils. ILSAC GF-6 and API SP requirements. It's the main reason I don't use them and vis up one grade when I am forced to. 😉 

 

IMO using a better lab would be helpful. Ask Nick. @Black02Silverado. I use his lab and get good service. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Pretty rare for any GDI motor to not display some fuel dilution. Has to do with the fact that cold it doesn't vaporize the fuel, it atomizes it and the silly practice of over rich cold starts with really late ignition timing. A practice used to get the cats up to temperature quicker. Burning fuel in them. :mad: If you lab used GC instead of a 'crackle test' I'd expect you would see  a percent or so. 

 

Copper in Ecotec3 motors is not uncommon. Platform specific. Hemi's do this too. Pepper at 165K still showed about the same amount she did at 80K. I don't worry about it. She's nearing 200K and runs like top. Should have latest results some time this week. 

 

I don't know what oil you are using but shear down of the VM is absolutely possible in that short of time. What we considered a flaw a few decades ago in VM chemistry is now advertised as a 'Feature". One used to get enough viscosity driven fuel economy improvement into the 20 and 30 grade oils. ILSAC GF-6 and API SP requirements. It's the main reason I don't use them and vis up one grade when I am forced to. 😉 

 

IMO using a better lab would be helpful. Ask Nick. @Black02Silverado. I use his lab and get good service. 

Where the hell is this copper coming from? These engines ain`t all that complex.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, PunchT37 said:

Where the hell is this copper coming from? These engines ain`t all that complex.

 

I honestly don't know. But I do know a fella that has Lake Speed looking into it for his Hemi. Lake didn't know either but is investigating it. 

  • Like 3
Posted
On 10/20/2025 at 5:12 AM, Black02Silverado said:

Interesting.  3k miles and it sheered down? Fuel dilution test from Blackstone isn't very reliable.  Oil Analyzers would be a better choice and to my knowledge less in cost, especially if you are a Preferred Customer.  Every consider using them?

I don’t doubt it sheared. Look at the factory fill result and then imagine someone running that out the full interval as most people do. Stuff can get real ugly in a hurry running with what amounts to an SAE 16 in a full sized truck! 
 

That said, Blackstone tends to undershoot viscosity too so perhaps things aren’t quite as bad as they appear. I used to appreciate that lab making analysis more accessible to people who otherwise wouldn’t bother. But they really gotta clean things up there. They are charging more than ever and making people wait a month or more. All just to receive bad advice and inaccurate data. Imagine if this was done in the medical field. “Well your liver is failing but our lab doesn’t really see the issue, so just keep drinking”…

  • Like 2
Posted
On 10/20/2025 at 7:31 AM, PunchT37 said:

Yeah. That got me thinking. Lab QC not there? I do a water lab so, there can be errors in lab work. I have stayed so far as to watch the copper trends without changing labs.

 

New 5.3 with fuel dilution? Hmm. I`m not buying that viscosity report. So, how bout the rest? Hmm. Copper should have come down by now. External oil cooler or not.

Do you add octane booster to this engine? Manganese is incredibly elevated. Remind me what engine and oil and viscosity? 

Posted
1 hour ago, customboss said:

Do you add octane booster to this engine? Manganese is incredibly elevated. Remind me what engine and oil and viscosity? 

No octane booster. L84 with Valvoline Advanced 5w30. 7800 miles on it now. A year old tomorrow. Didn`t even get my free oil change from the dealer.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

No octane booster. L84 with Valvoline Advanced 5w30. 7800 miles on it now. A year old tomorrow. Didn`t even get my free oil change from the dealer.

Then the manganese is a valve alloy leachate. 
Valvoline runs a bit less viscous than other lubes brands. So 9 cSt is just fine @100C. 
 

GM uses a sintered bearing bushing and the copper leaches off that a long time. 
 

I still cant figure out the copper on the 6.4 MOPAR. 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, customboss said:

Then the manganese is a valve alloy leachate. 
Valvoline runs a bit less viscous than other lubes brands. So 9 cSt is just fine @100C. 
 

GM uses a sintered bearing bushing and the copper leaches off that a long time. 
 

I still cant figure out the copper on the 6.4 MOPAR. 

Bearing bushing? My brain might be shot but, I can`t picture this thing. Front of the cam area? Cam phaser?

Posted
1 hour ago, PunchT37 said:

Bearing bushing? My brain might be shot but, I can`t picture this thing. Front of the cam area? Cam phaser?

Main bearing caps alloy I think. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Or, the mains?

 

Wonder what this coating is made of? The stop/start engines have these. Not the L83/L86.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.d766c57f7c9d8385e660bf6795e557a4.jpeg

The bearings in the GM 5.3L L84 engine commonly use copper-based alloys for strength, wear resistance, and durability. Specifically, the main and rod bearings typically feature:
•    Copper-Lead Alloy: A traditional bearing material combining copper with lead, offering excellent load-carrying capacity and fatigue resistance.
•    Copper-Tin Alloy: An alloy that enhances strength and wear properties, often used in engine bearings to handle the stresses of internal combustion.
•    Layers or Coatings: These bearings often have layered constructions, with a steel backing for support, a copper or copper alloy intermediate layer for strength, and a soft overlay (like babbitt or a tin alloy) on the surface to provide conformability and embed debris.
In modern GM engines like the L84, the use of copper-based alloy bearings reflects a balance of durability, friction reduction, and compatibility with the engine’s lubrication system, which includes specific synthetic oils recommended for the engine. These alloys help withstand the high loads and temperatures inside the engine while providing good resistance to fatigue and seizure.
Overall, copper is a crucial base metal in these bearing alloys, enabling long-lasting engine performance in the L84 5.3L V8.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...