Jump to content

Control arms hit after suspension mods please help


Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like that was a Bitch to get that strut in place , I had a 2" spacer on a ford that was tough to finesse in there Can't imagine that 4" was easy !, 

on the ground does it look any better? 

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I think it’s time to return it all to stock and get it checked out by a professional. Something is jacked and with all of the crap that’s been changed it’s hard to say what exactly screwed it all up.


2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo
Bilstein 5100
Rough Country Level

Posted

It should not hit at all , upper control arms Did not come with the Lift kit ?

Posted
12 minutes ago, Centex14 said:

I think it’s time to return it all to stock and get it checked out by a professional. Something is jacked and with all of the crap that’s been changed it’s hard to say what exactly screwed it all up.


2014 z71 LTZ
Volant Intake
Borla Exhaust
Diablo
Bilstein 5100
Rough Country Level

My thoughts exactly.

Posted

a2419f1723704b777b58ec6206646364.jpg41d3cb3e56b7d9da251f6e964947f2ff.jpg0e234adb3aa9e9fee451795485b7f545.jpg

Excuse the tape, i was using it to hold some stuff out the way



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That upper spacer looks huge. Is it 2.5" lift spacer or is it actaully 2.5" tall cuz that's a big difference. The spacers don't lift at a 1:1 ratio.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted
That upper spacer looks huge. Is it 2.5" lift spacer or is it actaully 2.5" tall cuz that's a big difference. The spacers don't lift at a 1:1 ratio.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk


No its a 3.5” lift spacer
But it doesnt measure 3.5”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

No its a 3.5” lift spacer
But it doesnt measure 3.5”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What does it measure?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted
What does it measure?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk


2.5”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 minutes ago, 14cris said:


2.5”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thats a 5" lift spacer then. These arms are a 1:2 ratio

Posted

I'm pretty sure that's your issue. These trucks lift at approximately 2:1 with spacers. That's probably closer to 5" of lift


2.5”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted
Just now, Fix29 said:

I'm pretty sure that's your issue. These trucks lift at approximately 2:1 with spacers. That's probably closer to 5" of lift

 


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
 

 

Thats exactly the problem

Posted
Thats exactly the problem
Definitely agree. Thats way too much lift for spacers and a diff drop.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted

What??? Im dumb founded!!
I measured, from the top of my tire to the plastic trim piece on the fender, the results are as follows
With just 1” spacer UNDER shock = 7.5”
When the strut spacer went in=10.5”
when i installed knuckle=11.25”
As it sits now with 1” spacer removed= 10.25”
But maybe im measuring the wrong distances because of you guys said to measure from middle of wheel to fender


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
2 minutes ago, 14cris said:

What??? Im dumb founded!!
I measured, from the top of my tire to the plastic trim piece on the fender, the results are as follows
With just 1” spacer UNDER shock = 7.5”
When the strut spacer went in=10.5”
when i installed knuckle=11.25”
As it sits now with 1” spacer removed= 10.25”
But maybe im measuring the wrong distances because of you guys said to measure from middle of wheel to fender


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Youre maxing out the droop. So i bet theres a lot of tension on your suspension right noe

Posted
Youre maxing out the droop. So i bet theres a lot of tension on your suspension right noe

I dont get how the trucks are a 1:2 ratio if it didnt raise it 5” though
All i really wanted was a damn 3”-3.5” leveling kit and call it a damn day


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...