Jump to content

6 inch or 4.5

RecurveBow

Recommended Posts

Penguin VII Enthusiast

Penguin VII

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, pronstar said:

A properly engineered suspension lift should absolutely ride better than stock.

 

There’s no point adding wheel travel if the springs and dampers don’t take advantage of it.

 

It’s the difference between something engineered for function (which costs more), versus a setup designed to look good (more affordable).

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

Well I'm currently running a BDS 6" lift which is supposedly a solid brand with great engineering. Have any thoughts on how to soften the ride because mine def rides harsher than stock.

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
pronstar Enthusiast

pronstar

Posted
Posted
Well I'm currently running a BDS 6" lift which is supposedly a solid brand with great engineering. Have any thoughts on how to soften the ride because mine def rides harsher than stock.



What spring/shock/coilover in front?
What UCA?

What leafs/shocks in the rear?

What psi in your tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
lapoolboy Senior Enthusiast

lapoolboy

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Penguin VII said:

Thats legit my same setup. It's def the nicest riding lifted truck I've ridden in (although I'm very interested in riding in one of the ram 1500s with the air ride and lift) but I wouldn't consider the lift to be equal or better to the factory ride. You located in the north east by any chance?

I'd definitely say my truck's ride is the same (if not slightly better) than stock.  

 

Not in the Northeast....I'm in the Deep South.....Louisiana

rivertrail Enthusiast

rivertrail

Posted
Posted

I've got a 6" zone lift with 35" nitto ridge grapplers.  I love it.  I do think it rides somewhat better or atleast the same as stock setup.  I wouldn't change anything about it.

Penguin VII Enthusiast

Penguin VII

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, pronstar said:

 

 


What spring/shock/coilover in front?
What UCA?

What leafs/shocks in the rear?

What psi in your tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

It's the spring/shock setup from the BDS non coilover 6" lift. I believe it only changes the front strut and the spring stays the same.

Factory UCA. I believe the aluminum ones but can't be certain (I can check later today)

rear leaf spring is the upgrade kit from BDS (not add a leaf, part #001559)

Fox 2.0 rear shocks 

 

36 psi in front, 34 in rear (figured it would be better to have the rear with less pis since it's normally unloaded except for the cover)

Open to recommendations here. 

pronstar Enthusiast

pronstar

Posted
Posted

A 2-inch shock is going to have a hard time dealing with the forces that a 35-inch tire generates, let alone the factory coil.

It’s possible to get a 3/4-ton truck to ride very nice on 35’s, but it ain’t cheap. Getting a 1/2-ton on 35’s to ride nice is a lot easier and a bit cheaper...but not cheap.

It really depends on budget and your own priorities. But it will all start with springs (coils and leafs), and shocks valved to match your setup.

I don’t know details about the BDS setup, but my gut tells me your factory UCA’s aren’t doing you any favors, either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

lapoolboy Senior Enthusiast

lapoolboy

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, pronstar said:

I don’t know details about the BDS setup, but my gut tells me your factory UCA’s aren’t doing you any favors, either.

Tell me how UCAs that aren't hitting the coil buckets or droop stops contribute to a harsh ride.  Unless one or both of the conditions I stated are occurring, the things just go up and down.  I have factory UCAs (stamped steel at that), and my ride quality is superb.

Penguin VII Enthusiast

Penguin VII

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, pronstar said:

A 2-inch shock is going to have a hard time dealing with the forces that a 35-inch tire generates, let alone the factory coil.

It’s possible to get a 3/4-ton truck to ride very nice on 35’s, but it ain’t cheap. Getting a 1/2-ton on 35’s to ride nice is a lot easier and a bit cheaper...but not cheap.

It really depends on budget and your own priorities. But it will all start with springs (coils and leafs), and shocks valved to match your setup.

I don’t know details about the BDS setup, but my gut tells me your factory UCA’s aren’t doing you any favors, either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Interested in hearing more about the UCAs. So what you're telling me is that in your opinion the upgraded coilover kit will help the ride. If thats the case it seems odd that the customer service from BDS told me twice that I wouldn't see much of any on road improvement. I would think they want to sell me stuff, and if it was better they would happily say so.

 

If you have any recommendations for specific setups I'm all ears. I don't know the specific details about the BDS kit but I know it's a knuckle drop kit and I'd imagine they are all similar in setup.

pronstar Enthusiast

pronstar

Posted
Posted
Tell me how UCAs that aren't hitting the coil buckets or droop stops contribute to a harsh ride.  Unless one or both of the conditions I stated are occurring, the things just go up and down.  I have factory UCAs (stamped steel at that), and my ride quality is superb.



That’s why I stated opinion with the caveat that I don’t know details of his setup.

If it’s just a knuckle drop, his ride should be comparable to stock if the springs are stock and the shocks are valved close to stock.

But clearly, something sounds amiss with his setup. Otherwise it makes no sense that you have a superb ride, and his is crappy with ostensibly the same setup.

The UCA’s don’t need to hit static to have a bad ride. If they’re close to the drop stop to begin with, it could be hiring it dynamically. I don’t know if that’s what his issue is, that’s the problem if diagnosing things via keyboard.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
pronstar Enthusiast

pronstar

Posted
Posted
Interested in hearing more about the UCAs. So what you're telling me is that in your opinion the upgraded coilover kit will help the ride. If thats the case it seems odd that the customer service from BDS told me twice that I wouldn't see much of any on road improvement. I would think they want to sell me stuff, and if it was better they would happily say so.

 

If you have any recommendations for specific setups I'm all ears. I don't know the specific details about the BDS kit but I know it's a knuckle drop kit and I'd imagine they are all similar in setup.

 

My opinion is that soft spring rate and shocks that are valved accordingly will give you a good ride.

 

A 2.5 inch rezzie shock, when valved for your setup, absolutely rides better than a 2” emulsion shock. A 3” rezzie shock rides better than a 2.5 - when valved correctly.

 

On my previous truck I’ve ran Bilstein 5160, 2-in King emulsions, King 2.5 and custom-valved King 2.5...each step up have a noticeably better ride. Then I tried 3.0 King’s on an identical truck, which were even better but beyond what I wanted to spend.

 

All with progressive rate coils up front, and progressive Deaver’s in back...the shocks and valving was the only thing that changed.

 

If their rezzie setup with a larger shock isn’t giving a better ride, then something doesn’t sound right to me...but we’re also talking about a kit that isn’t increasing wheel travel based on what I’m reading, so that could be limiting.

 

I have zero experience with BDS. But I do have experience with Camburg and Carli, and if you work with them and get custom valving, you won’t be complaining about a harsh ride.

 

A well setup off road suspension isn’t harsh. You don’t see off road vehicles skipping across the ground on rock-hard suspensions. They also can be “not great” onroad as far as body lean goes, but they do ride very well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Darksky Enthusiast

Darksky

Posted
Posted

Six inch Fabtech lift with uniball UCAs, Dirt Logc 2.5 non resi coilovers. Out back one full length leaf added to the stack per Rocky Mountain Spring and Suspension on a five inch Fabtech block, Dirt Logic 2.25  non resi shocks. 

 

BFG TAKO2 34x12.5 R18 on 18x9 wheels with 4.5 BS. GM Factory well liners and mud flaps  No hammering, cutting or distorting of the wheel wells done at all. I went down to 18 inch wheels for the increased side wall height. IMHO you need enough sidewall to absorb some of the bumps on a truck driven off road.

 

Zero rubbing with complete extension/compression of the suspension, lock to lock

 

Here is the best part: the truck rides better than stock, it performs flawlessly while being driven as a ranch truck on gravel roads,across the prairie chasing cattle, in the snow and as my primary vehicle that makes bi-annual cross country road trips.  

 

You may spend a few dollars, but you can easily make these trucks perform amazingly.

Penguin VII Enthusiast

Penguin VII

Posted
Posted
On 10/20/2018 at 10:01 AM, pronstar said:

 

My opinion is that soft spring rate and shocks that are valved accordingly will give you a good ride.

 

A 2.5 inch rezzie shock, when valved for your setup, absolutely rides better than a 2” emulsion shock. A 3” rezzie shock rides better than a 2.5 - when valved correctly.

 

On my previous truck I’ve ran Bilstein 5160, 2-in King emulsions, King 2.5 and custom-valved King 2.5...each step up have a noticeably better ride. Then I tried 3.0 King’s on an identical truck, which were even better but beyond what I wanted to spend.

 

All with progressive rate coils up front, and progressive Deaver’s in back...the shocks and valving was the only thing that changed.

 

If their rezzie setup with a larger shock isn’t giving a better ride, then something doesn’t sound right to me...but we’re also talking about a kit that isn’t increasing wheel travel based on what I’m reading, so that could be limiting.

 

I have zero experience with BDS. But I do have experience with Camburg and Carli, and if you work with them and get custom valving, you won’t be complaining about a harsh ride.

 

A well setup off road suspension isn’t harsh. You don’t see off road vehicles skipping across the ground on rock-hard suspensions. They also can be “not great” onroad as far as body lean goes, but they do ride very well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I think the main difference here is that I'm not using their rezzie shock, I'm using their default kit, which comes with an new front shock but the same spring. From what I'm piecing together here the coilovers will def have a better ride because of the reservoir and increased body size of 2.5".

I'm going to have to look into UCAs as well, but I'm still a little unclear on what value they add for a 90% onroad driven truck.

RecurveBow Enthusiast

RecurveBow

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 10/18/2018 at 4:03 PM, Penguin VII said:

Happy to help a fellow hunter :)

Deer? Turkey? 

RecurveBow Enthusiast

RecurveBow

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the replies guys. I've been lurking the past few days but have been unable to respond. I have had the craziest time figuring out how to get a 6.5" Zone to work with stock tires, 35x12.5 and these stamped steel arms without having the tires stick out a mile. I don't mind a little, but I like a tighter/cleaner look. Seems like this could be solved with aftermarket UCAs? 

lapoolboy Senior Enthusiast

lapoolboy

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Bama08 said:

Thanks for the replies guys. I've been lurking the past few days but have been unable to respond. I have had the craziest time figuring out how to get a 6.5" Zone to work with stock tires, 35x12.5 and these stamped steel arms without having the tires stick out a mile. I don't mind a little, but I like a tighter/cleaner look. Seems like this could be solved with aftermarket UCAs? 

I have that EXACT setup.  The fronts will stick out an additional 1.5" over stock.  it looks perfect to me and absolutely no trimming of anything was required.  Throw some 1.5" BORA spacers on the rear and you're golden.

20180719_202351(0).jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Sir, economics doesn't have a moral compass. 😉 Just say'n. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      One would think. BUT....This is what a Google search gives for the GM OLM system:    It doesn't measure oil condition save the highly indirect water temperature. It should measure oil temperature and as we've discussed they are not as closely related as one might assume. The algorithm is based on expected conditions at the end of a certain number of miles or revolutions. And sirs, this estimated value is not tilted in the engines favor. It favors the OEM's bottom line. There are no magical number of miles nor revolutions. No magical time limit. There is only what can be measured directly and only in the broadest of terms would the values used even come close to reality.    It samples nothing. It has no idea where the oil started or where it will finish given the limited values use to create the algorithm. It is just a reminder for the brain dead to do something at some time to keep the warranty in tact. Pure fiction.    Key Factors in Oil Life Calculation The OLM calculates the remaining oil life percentage based on the following factors: Factor Description Engine Revolutions Tracks the number of engine revolutions since the last reset, decreasing oil life with use. Mileage Since Last Reset Monitors the distance driven since the last oil change, capped at 7,500 miles for most models. Time Since Reset Decreases oil life over time, dropping to 0% after one year, regardless of mileage. Engine Temperature Adjusts oil life based on coolant temperature; exceeding 260°F sets oil life to 0%.  
    • BDS my HD
      Brand new to this forum. Questions about re-gearing my 26’ HD

      By BDS my HD · Posted

      Towing power and I guess MPG matter that’s why I may end up going with a gear swap as soon as they’re available for this truck if I’m correct
    • GMTruckGuy74
      2027 Chevrolet Silverado: Official Discussion

      By GMTruckGuy74 · Posted

      If I may, I'd like to post my prediction of the trim levels for the 2027 GMC Sierra, based on what was released/introduced today about the Chevy Silverado.   Using the "Professional Grade" wording already in use by GMC, here are the eight (8) trims I believe the Sierra will offer (comparable Chevy trim in parenthesis): Sierra Pro (Work Truck/WT) Elevation (Custom) Elevation Premium -or- Ultimate (Silverado) AT4 (Custom Trail Boss) AT4 Premium -or- Ultimate (Trail Boss) AT4X (ZR2) Denali (High Country) Denali Ultimate (N/A) If GMC would rather simplify the trim levels, then I predict six (6) with package upgrades in parenthesis: Sierra Pro (with a Graphite package upgrade option) Elevation (with a Premium -or- Ultimate package upgrade) AT4 (with a Premium -or- Ultimate package upgrade) AT4X (with AEV and Ultimate packages upgrade) Denali Denali Ultimate  Let's see if I'm close.
    • revmanii
      Auto start stop disable

      By revmanii · Posted

      I have to believe there are already a bunch of threads on this, but my searches didn't turn up much. While I like the ease of a plugin solution like the Carbyte, It appears it disables the AFM or DFM too, and is not configurable to only disable the auto stop/start. So, I'm looking at the Autostop Eliminator product. I like the idea of it better, but I'm concerned about the install and having to pull so many panels to get it installed. Mines a 2026 work truck, so from what I've read it's a less involved install, but having watched a couple install vid's, I'm still a little intimidated. Might need to buy some plastic trim tools to get it done without breaking or marring stuff. Any experience intalling in a WT greatly appreciated.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...