Jump to content

6 inch or 4.5


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, pronstar said:

A properly engineered suspension lift should absolutely ride better than stock.

 

There’s no point adding wheel travel if the springs and dampers don’t take advantage of it.

 

It’s the difference between something engineered for function (which costs more), versus a setup designed to look good (more affordable).

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

Well I'm currently running a BDS 6" lift which is supposedly a solid brand with great engineering. Have any thoughts on how to soften the ride because mine def rides harsher than stock.

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Well I'm currently running a BDS 6" lift which is supposedly a solid brand with great engineering. Have any thoughts on how to soften the ride because mine def rides harsher than stock.



What spring/shock/coilover in front?
What UCA?

What leafs/shocks in the rear?

What psi in your tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
26 minutes ago, Penguin VII said:

Thats legit my same setup. It's def the nicest riding lifted truck I've ridden in (although I'm very interested in riding in one of the ram 1500s with the air ride and lift) but I wouldn't consider the lift to be equal or better to the factory ride. You located in the north east by any chance?

I'd definitely say my truck's ride is the same (if not slightly better) than stock.  

 

Not in the Northeast....I'm in the Deep South.....Louisiana

Posted

I've got a 6" zone lift with 35" nitto ridge grapplers.  I love it.  I do think it rides somewhat better or atleast the same as stock setup.  I wouldn't change anything about it.

Posted
1 hour ago, pronstar said:

 

 


What spring/shock/coilover in front?
What UCA?

What leafs/shocks in the rear?

What psi in your tires?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

It's the spring/shock setup from the BDS non coilover 6" lift. I believe it only changes the front strut and the spring stays the same.

Factory UCA. I believe the aluminum ones but can't be certain (I can check later today)

rear leaf spring is the upgrade kit from BDS (not add a leaf, part #001559)

Fox 2.0 rear shocks 

 

36 psi in front, 34 in rear (figured it would be better to have the rear with less pis since it's normally unloaded except for the cover)

Open to recommendations here. 

Posted

A 2-inch shock is going to have a hard time dealing with the forces that a 35-inch tire generates, let alone the factory coil.

It’s possible to get a 3/4-ton truck to ride very nice on 35’s, but it ain’t cheap. Getting a 1/2-ton on 35’s to ride nice is a lot easier and a bit cheaper...but not cheap.

It really depends on budget and your own priorities. But it will all start with springs (coils and leafs), and shocks valved to match your setup.

I don’t know details about the BDS setup, but my gut tells me your factory UCA’s aren’t doing you any favors, either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted
4 hours ago, pronstar said:

I don’t know details about the BDS setup, but my gut tells me your factory UCA’s aren’t doing you any favors, either.

Tell me how UCAs that aren't hitting the coil buckets or droop stops contribute to a harsh ride.  Unless one or both of the conditions I stated are occurring, the things just go up and down.  I have factory UCAs (stamped steel at that), and my ride quality is superb.

Posted
12 hours ago, pronstar said:

A 2-inch shock is going to have a hard time dealing with the forces that a 35-inch tire generates, let alone the factory coil.

It’s possible to get a 3/4-ton truck to ride very nice on 35’s, but it ain’t cheap. Getting a 1/2-ton on 35’s to ride nice is a lot easier and a bit cheaper...but not cheap.

It really depends on budget and your own priorities. But it will all start with springs (coils and leafs), and shocks valved to match your setup.

I don’t know details about the BDS setup, but my gut tells me your factory UCA’s aren’t doing you any favors, either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Interested in hearing more about the UCAs. So what you're telling me is that in your opinion the upgraded coilover kit will help the ride. If thats the case it seems odd that the customer service from BDS told me twice that I wouldn't see much of any on road improvement. I would think they want to sell me stuff, and if it was better they would happily say so.

 

If you have any recommendations for specific setups I'm all ears. I don't know the specific details about the BDS kit but I know it's a knuckle drop kit and I'd imagine they are all similar in setup.

Posted
Tell me how UCAs that aren't hitting the coil buckets or droop stops contribute to a harsh ride.  Unless one or both of the conditions I stated are occurring, the things just go up and down.  I have factory UCAs (stamped steel at that), and my ride quality is superb.



That’s why I stated opinion with the caveat that I don’t know details of his setup.

If it’s just a knuckle drop, his ride should be comparable to stock if the springs are stock and the shocks are valved close to stock.

But clearly, something sounds amiss with his setup. Otherwise it makes no sense that you have a superb ride, and his is crappy with ostensibly the same setup.

The UCA’s don’t need to hit static to have a bad ride. If they’re close to the drop stop to begin with, it could be hiring it dynamically. I don’t know if that’s what his issue is, that’s the problem if diagnosing things via keyboard.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
Interested in hearing more about the UCAs. So what you're telling me is that in your opinion the upgraded coilover kit will help the ride. If thats the case it seems odd that the customer service from BDS told me twice that I wouldn't see much of any on road improvement. I would think they want to sell me stuff, and if it was better they would happily say so.

 

If you have any recommendations for specific setups I'm all ears. I don't know the specific details about the BDS kit but I know it's a knuckle drop kit and I'd imagine they are all similar in setup.

 

My opinion is that soft spring rate and shocks that are valved accordingly will give you a good ride.

 

A 2.5 inch rezzie shock, when valved for your setup, absolutely rides better than a 2” emulsion shock. A 3” rezzie shock rides better than a 2.5 - when valved correctly.

 

On my previous truck I’ve ran Bilstein 5160, 2-in King emulsions, King 2.5 and custom-valved King 2.5...each step up have a noticeably better ride. Then I tried 3.0 King’s on an identical truck, which were even better but beyond what I wanted to spend.

 

All with progressive rate coils up front, and progressive Deaver’s in back...the shocks and valving was the only thing that changed.

 

If their rezzie setup with a larger shock isn’t giving a better ride, then something doesn’t sound right to me...but we’re also talking about a kit that isn’t increasing wheel travel based on what I’m reading, so that could be limiting.

 

I have zero experience with BDS. But I do have experience with Camburg and Carli, and if you work with them and get custom valving, you won’t be complaining about a harsh ride.

 

A well setup off road suspension isn’t harsh. You don’t see off road vehicles skipping across the ground on rock-hard suspensions. They also can be “not great” onroad as far as body lean goes, but they do ride very well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

Six inch Fabtech lift with uniball UCAs, Dirt Logc 2.5 non resi coilovers. Out back one full length leaf added to the stack per Rocky Mountain Spring and Suspension on a five inch Fabtech block, Dirt Logic 2.25  non resi shocks. 

 

BFG TAKO2 34x12.5 R18 on 18x9 wheels with 4.5 BS. GM Factory well liners and mud flaps  No hammering, cutting or distorting of the wheel wells done at all. I went down to 18 inch wheels for the increased side wall height. IMHO you need enough sidewall to absorb some of the bumps on a truck driven off road.

 

Zero rubbing with complete extension/compression of the suspension, lock to lock

 

Here is the best part: the truck rides better than stock, it performs flawlessly while being driven as a ranch truck on gravel roads,across the prairie chasing cattle, in the snow and as my primary vehicle that makes bi-annual cross country road trips.  

 

You may spend a few dollars, but you can easily make these trucks perform amazingly.

Posted
On 10/20/2018 at 10:01 AM, pronstar said:

 

My opinion is that soft spring rate and shocks that are valved accordingly will give you a good ride.

 

A 2.5 inch rezzie shock, when valved for your setup, absolutely rides better than a 2” emulsion shock. A 3” rezzie shock rides better than a 2.5 - when valved correctly.

 

On my previous truck I’ve ran Bilstein 5160, 2-in King emulsions, King 2.5 and custom-valved King 2.5...each step up have a noticeably better ride. Then I tried 3.0 King’s on an identical truck, which were even better but beyond what I wanted to spend.

 

All with progressive rate coils up front, and progressive Deaver’s in back...the shocks and valving was the only thing that changed.

 

If their rezzie setup with a larger shock isn’t giving a better ride, then something doesn’t sound right to me...but we’re also talking about a kit that isn’t increasing wheel travel based on what I’m reading, so that could be limiting.

 

I have zero experience with BDS. But I do have experience with Camburg and Carli, and if you work with them and get custom valving, you won’t be complaining about a harsh ride.

 

A well setup off road suspension isn’t harsh. You don’t see off road vehicles skipping across the ground on rock-hard suspensions. They also can be “not great” onroad as far as body lean goes, but they do ride very well.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I think the main difference here is that I'm not using their rezzie shock, I'm using their default kit, which comes with an new front shock but the same spring. From what I'm piecing together here the coilovers will def have a better ride because of the reservoir and increased body size of 2.5".

I'm going to have to look into UCAs as well, but I'm still a little unclear on what value they add for a 90% onroad driven truck.

Posted
On 10/18/2018 at 4:03 PM, Penguin VII said:

Happy to help a fellow hunter :)

Deer? Turkey? 

Posted

Thanks for the replies guys. I've been lurking the past few days but have been unable to respond. I have had the craziest time figuring out how to get a 6.5" Zone to work with stock tires, 35x12.5 and these stamped steel arms without having the tires stick out a mile. I don't mind a little, but I like a tighter/cleaner look. Seems like this could be solved with aftermarket UCAs? 

Posted
5 hours ago, Bama08 said:

Thanks for the replies guys. I've been lurking the past few days but have been unable to respond. I have had the craziest time figuring out how to get a 6.5" Zone to work with stock tires, 35x12.5 and these stamped steel arms without having the tires stick out a mile. I don't mind a little, but I like a tighter/cleaner look. Seems like this could be solved with aftermarket UCAs? 

I have that EXACT setup.  The fronts will stick out an additional 1.5" over stock.  it looks perfect to me and absolutely no trimming of anything was required.  Throw some 1.5" BORA spacers on the rear and you're golden.

20180719_202351(0).jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...