Jump to content

New L83 Check engine light on with E85


Zubadenzie

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere, but my searches always return 0 results....

 

After running out the dealers gas, I filled my new 2018 Z71 Crew with E85. I always used it in my 07 Avalanche and it ran great! After reading up on the HP and Torque benefits of using E85 with the L83 motor, I filled up with less than 300 miles on the truck.   Driving home, it ran great. The next day, I started the truck and the check engine light was on. The truck seemed to miss fire under low rpms and stuttered a bit when switching from V4 to V8 mode. Needless to say, I was unhappy. I assumed that maybe the Flexfuel I got may have had water or something in it. The remote start would no longer function either.

 

Yesterday I started the truck with nearly 450 miles and the light was off. Remote start working again. I took a 150 mile interstate trip with zero problems. Thinking that the water had evaporated or the truck's computer had decided that the flexfuel was ok or something, I drove until nearly empty. Filled up again with flex fuel at a different station, in another town, and finished the drive home (70 miles or so). No problems what so ever.

 

Later that day i got in for a quick trip to town, started the truck and there the check engine light was back on! Back to missfiring and stuttering.

 

What is going on? Did I get a lemon? Is this common? Do I need an exorcism? Any help would be appreciated.

 

Only mods I have done have been the Fog and reverse light/bed light diode mods.

Posted

Need the code to tell you anything

 

every single person who owns a car 1996 or newer should invest in a cheap ob2 scanner, even if you’re not doing the repairs.

 

just always better to be informed 

 

Posted

Is your truck flex fuel capable?  It's an option on 5.3s 2015 and newer.  You are looking for RPO FHS. Is it's FHO it's not

Posted

Build sheet lists an 5.3L V8 ECOTEC3. When I looked up the ECOTEC3 the majority of the article referred to the enhanced E85 capability. I guess that's another thing I need to check.

Posted

My 2018 5.3 is not. You can either scan the QR code in the door jamb to look for that RPO code I listed or I read that the flex-fuel ones have some sort of flex fuel sticker on the gas door. our trucks don't have gas caps anymore so it won't be yellow like it was at first. You can also check the window sticker it's a separate option that's $100

Posted

Thanks! I would have def paid the $100. Guess the salesman didn't know either. He popped the hood and said that the 5.3L V8 ECOTEC3 in the truck is E85 compliant. But, the RPO does show FHO! GREAT! I guess it'll get over this tank full too.

Posted

My guess is that the engine is compliant in all cases. Its the fuel tank, fuel lines, and such that need to be upgraded for $100 to handle the more corrosive effects of E85. Why it caused your engine to misbehave is interesting, and worth knowing (for the forum's sake) what code was being thrown.  

Posted

It would be interesting to know as well.  Our 2016 isn't FF and I run E85 in it with no problems.  Curious as to what is going on with yours.  Heck even my 2002 which is not FF runs fine with no issues and it has been using it for 2 years now.  Just might be some bad E85, especially if it isn't fresh and not a big seller from those stations.  It is amazing on how many people don't have a clue that the yellow cap means they can run it.  I talk to them all the time when I'm at the pump filling up and see that they have a FF vehicle and are using regular. They tell me they had no idea.

Posted
5 hours ago, ftwhite said:

My guess is that the engine is compliant in all cases. Its the fuel tank, fuel lines, and such that need to be upgraded for $100 to handle the more corrosive effects of E85. Why it caused your engine to misbehave is interesting, and worth knowing (for the forum's sake) what code was being thrown.  

The $100 is for a sensor that tells the truck how much ethanol is in the fuel.  The more ethanol, the richer it needs to run (much higher quantity of fuel for the same operation.  Your truck has fuel trims to adjust and they're most likely pegged out to try and compensate, which is only getting closer to where it needs to be. Don't be surprised if after you put gas in it runs a little off for a while as it re-adjusts back down.  

 

No cause for concern for a tank or two, but obviously we're stuck with regular gas.  If you're willing to potentially void your warranty you can install the sensor and tune the vehicle. 

Posted

I bet your truck is not E85 capable.

 

Look on the lower corner of your driver's door window there is a sticker that says FLEXFUEL if its compatible. Or, check your glovebox RPO label (SPID label) and look for the following RPO code:

 

FHO: Vehicle Fuel Gasoline E10 (NOT a FlexFuel Truck)

 

FHS: Vehicle Fuel Gasoline E85 (FlexFuel Truck)

 

*courtesy of Newdude*

Posted

My 2018 isn’t FF either and I ran one tank of E85 in it and had the symptoms as the OP. I am going to order the sensor and tubes soon to convert mine over.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

It's not a big deal to convert to add the sensor, in fact, there was a post on it here just the other day that was years old but had been refreshed.  

Posted
On 11/19/2018 at 2:24 PM, ftwhite said:

My guess is that the engine is compliant in all cases. Its the fuel tank, fuel lines, and such that need to be upgraded for $100 to handle the more corrosive effects of E85. Why it caused your engine to misbehave is interesting, and worth knowing (for the forum's sake) what code was being thrown.  

 

Incorrect, the fuel system is the same across the board. The extra $100 is for adding the flex fuel sensor into the system and modifying the OEM tune to accept flex fuel. It is an easy fix to some degree, but it will cost around $500 now to convert over to FF.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 733 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...