Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/13/2020 at 6:28 PM, garymcel said:

made a deal today on 6.2 midnight edition black trail boss sunroof leather conv package II safety package lpo splash guards advanced trailer package  $61465 msrp minus 3576 teacher discount minus 5000 customer cash minus 750 own a jeep discount price is $52589 traded a 2019 Rst they gave me $41000 for it i owed $27760 so my out the door is around $41000 and got them to give me a REV hard tri folding tonneau cover on it  let me know what you guys think please also i bought the Rst last october for $40000 before trade on a 2011 silverado so i got $1000 more on this trade than i paid last year 

 

I think that's nice deal and sounds like a sharp truck!

 

 

Posted
made a deal today on 6.2 midnight edition black trail boss sunroof leather conv package II safety package lpo splash guards advanced trailer package  $61465 msrp minus 3576 teacher discount minus 5000 customer cash minus 750 own a jeep discount price is $52589 traded a 2019 Rst they gave me $41000 for it i owed $27760 so my out the door is around $41000 and got them to give me a REV hard tri folding tonneau cover on it  let me know what you guys think please also i bought the Rst last october for $40000 before trade on a 2011 silverado so i got $1000 more on this trade than i paid last year 
The only thing that caught my attention here is that the teacher discount is $1245 more than active duty military and healthcare worker discount. We got $2,331 or for that.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

thats the amount that comes off that truck when you configure it all in the teacher discount section on chevy website i believe the amounts are different on every price point going up and down depending on MSRP

 

Posted

 

 

 

thats the amount that comes off that truck when you configure it all in the teacher discount section on chevy website i believe the amounts are different on every price point going up and down depending on MSRP

 

 

I found it interesting. That's all. Just for kicks and giggles, let's do some math.

 

3576/61465=5.8% teacher discount. Number of full time teachers in the US = 3.2 million.

 

2331/58755=3.9% military discount. Number of full time US military personnel = 1.3 million.

 

Don't construe this as me advocating that one group should get preferential treatment over the other. After all, both groups get low pay and perform tough jobs. Just find it interesting from a business perspective that the larger group has the larger discount. In my pea-sized brain I think a business is looking to maximize profits, and therefore would give the smaller discount to the larger group. Chevy isn't required to give anybody a discount. I'm just looking at this analytically.

 

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

actually just did same truck on chevys website under military discount and 60075msrp miltary discount shows it brought down to 56624 and then 5000 consumer cash brings it down to 51624 so its the same for first responder discount and teacher discount not sure if there is a price difference depending on where you live or not but all discounts are equal when i just did all three also on the new trucks that are being delivered now so the one im getting since it is still in transit chevy has raised the price on sticker they are now charging 215 more for midnight package and now are charging 180 for lpo mud flaps other trucks that are on lots already that are exactly the same msrp is 60070 and the one i am getting is 61465 whats up with that

Posted



actually just did same truck on chevys website under military discount and 60075msrp miltary discount shows it brought down to 56624 and then 5000 consumer cash brings it down to 51624 so its the same for first responder discount and teacher discount not sure if there is a price difference depending on where you live or not but all discounts are equal when i just did all three also on the new trucks that are being delivered now so the one im getting since it is still in transit chevy has raised the price on sticker they are now charging 215 more for midnight package and now are charging 180 for lpo mud flaps other trucks that are on lots already that are exactly the same msrp is 60070 and the one i am getting is 61465 whats up with that


That's interesting. The numbers I used above were yours and mine. I wonder if geography is a factor. I'm currently in an area that has a very high density of military personnel.

As for the price difference for the exact same trucks, that's funky. I wonder what changed. Are the Z71 badges getting blacked on the fenders for that additional 215.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

ya i dont know and the dealer was not sure why either since they have not got truck yet we will have to see when it gets here and its also weird that they cant track where the truck is or when it will arrive they said it should have been there already if you want to check what im saying use 15009 for zip code 

Posted

They should be able to track your truck. My dealer was able to. And, when I asked what the truck had they were able to pull up an electronic copy of the window sticker. I wonder if your dealer isn't aware of what they're capable of.

 

I was also just wondering if the trim line and options affect the discount. I bought a Trail Boss LT with the 6.2.

 

Edit: never mind on the trim line question. You and I have similar trucks -- trail boss lt with 6.2 and well equipped.

 

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted

Yeah, so Im looking at RST 3.0 with a MSRP of 59620.  Dealer knocking off 2963 and 5000 rebate for total of 51657.  Supposed to talk tomorrow, but not really thinking they will budge very much. They have to trade with another dealer for this truck, thinking I will talk, but probably have to wait until later in the year

Posted
1 hour ago, WDE94 said:

Yeah, so Im looking at RST 3.0 with a MSRP of 59620.  Dealer knocking off 2963 and 5000 rebate for total of 51657.  Supposed to talk tomorrow, but not really thinking they will budge very much. They have to trade with another dealer for this truck, thinking I will talk, but probably have to wait until later in the year

I think you're right. With the low levels of new inventory across the country, most dealers aren't willing to deal aggressively beyond manufacturer rebates right now. Mainly because as soon as you walk out of the store, someone else is going to wander in and pay them because there's not much else out there to choose from. $8K off MSRP on an RST isn't horrible, but it's far from great, too. 

 

This all depends on where you live, of course. 

Posted
On 12/14/2018 at 2:15 PM, fishingtruck said:

Getting ready to order a 19 denali, and was wondering what pricing owners have managed before taxes, or percent of msrp.

 

2020 Sierra AT4 6.2

MSRP 61,740

Paid 51,740

This dealer is lopping an even 10K from SLTs, AT4s and Denali.

51,740.png

Posted
15 hours ago, WDE94 said:

Yeah, so Im looking at RST 3.0 with a MSRP of 59620.  Dealer knocking off 2963 and 5000 rebate for total of 51657.  Supposed to talk tomorrow, but not really thinking they will budge very much. They have to trade with another dealer for this truck, thinking I will talk, but probably have to wait until later in the year

My local dealer in Whitesboro TX Holiday Chevy has 8 3.0 RST all marked 10,571.00 off if your willing to make an 11-12 hour drive. I've purchased a few vehicles from them and it was always a fast transaction, they deal in volume more than profit per vehicle. 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, WDE94 said:

Yeah, so Im looking at RST 3.0 with a MSRP of 59620.  Dealer knocking off 2963 and 5000 rebate for total of 51657.  Supposed to talk tomorrow, but not really thinking they will budge very much. They have to trade with another dealer for this truck, thinking I will talk, but probably have to wait until later in the year

 

They can do better - they may just not want to.  I purchased my RST Z71 3.0 4 weeks ago.  I received $9500 off the sticker, which was exactly $60,000.  That was a $4500 dealer discount and the $5000 rebate.  I also received a very fair trade value on 2 older vehicles: a 2010 Toyota Tundra and a 2018 Subaru Forester.

 

20200724_174604.thumb.jpg.5cb0d1c37dc8317b34b8ec10f5a16be8.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...