Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Method2Madness said:

I added the OEM fogs to my Custom and have 6K LED's in my highs and they're almost a perfect match. 

Thank you!

I was guessing around 6k but is nice to hear someone with experience comment. They don't have to be exact I just wanted them close(r)!

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, nolte said:

Thank you!

I was guessing around 6k but is nice to hear someone with experience comment. They don't have to be exact I just wanted them close(r)!

Yeap. You'll be happy. :)

 

 

BTW. I meant lows (low beams), not highs. I left the highs incandescent for the time being. Will probably change those to LED's eventually, but with the aforementioned combo, I really never use the highs, so I'm in no hurry.

Edited by Method2Madness
Posted

Their are alot of other better options in my opinion. More expensive yes but alot brighter and clearer.  I put morimoto 2 stroke bulbs in mine, they are even bright in the day time. No need for high beams with these. Adjusted properly they are totally awesome. At 145.00 a set tho but well worth it..!!  I'll try later to get a good pic so u can compare them.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Flatblack83 said:

Their are alot of other better options in my opinion. More expensive yes but alot brighter and clearer.  I put morimoto 2 stroke bulbs in mine, they are even bright in the day time. No need for high beams with these. Adjusted properly they are totally awesome. At 145.00 a set tho but well worth it..!!  I'll try later to get a good pic so u can compare them.

I'm ignorant about adjusting headlights... you mean they're so bright that the beam has to be tuned towards the ground?

Also 145 a set meaning $290 for both lows and highs?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Flatblack83 said:

Their are alot of other better options in my opinion. More expensive yes but alot brighter and clearer.  I put morimoto 2 stroke bulbs in mine, they are even bright in the day time. No need for high beams with these. Adjusted properly they are totally awesome. At 145.00 a set tho but well worth it..!!  I'll try later to get a good pic so u can compare them.

I'm ignorant about adjusting headlights... you mean they're so bright that the beam has to be tuned towards the ground?

Also 145 a set meaning $290 for both lows and highs?

Posted (edited)

Yes, they "might" need to be adjusted down some. Because your stock headlights are made for halogen bulbs. Which work differently. 

 

And yes 145.00 a pair, u wont need the highs at all. I left them alone, it's a waste.  These  bulbs with the stock fog lights are like the sun coming up the road.

 

I dont look for cheap led bulbs, 9 out of 10 times they dont last and u get to buy them again and again. Especially a light that will be on all the time.

Edited by Flatblack83
Posted (edited)

I put the Sealights in today and I like them. They do pair up quite well with the OEM LED fog lights.

The beam pattern is really similar to the OEM halogens as mentioned by others. This was important to me. The lows are good and clean below the line and don't spill out above it into oncoming traffic.

 

EDIT after the fact: after using them a bit more I can say both high and low beam are better than OEM. I really like these bulbs. They work well in the OEM halogen-fitted headlight housing. They're not crazy bright (which I like) but they're whiter, brighter, and sharper than the halogens.

 

One observation is that I can't tell as much of a difference between low beam and high beam. I think it's probably because these low beams are relatively brighter with respect to the OEM halogens than the high beams. It's possible that these high beams just aren't throwing as far down the road... but it's hard for me to say. I wouldn't say they're inadequate at all... just that the highs are not as noticeably brighter than the lows as the OEM bulbs are.

I suspect that it may be a combination of the fact that the Sealight low beams are more noticeably brighter than the OEM than the high beams, and that the Sealight high beams perhaps concentrate a little bit more in the center whereas the OEM halogens highs spill out a bit higher and further down the road..... in my truck at least.

 

I don't have any beam pattern pics but here are some pics that show color from lamps and the match up with the OEM fogs.

 

vOVyz_UORsJcQXLWgQ7DTtwNilmXeLsbj8sKW-H3

 

The fogs are a little bit cooler color if you're crazy picky but I'm happy with it and agree with M2M they match up well.

 

jl7MmgZDe444cOVY-pXSDYOFI3ZrmvZKSTZTw2u5

Edited by nolte
Posted

I just bought my first Silverado. Mine is a 2020 Trail Boss and want to change out the bulbs to LED.  I would assume the bulbs are the same as your 19?

Posted
On 12/28/2019 at 9:43 PM, nolte said:

I put the Sealights in today and I like them. They do pair up quite well with the OEM LED fog lights.

The beam pattern is really similar to the OEM halogens as mentioned by others. This was important to me. The lows are good and clean below the line and don't spill out above it into oncoming traffic.

 

One observation is that I can't tell as much of a difference between low beam and high beam. I think it's probably because these low beams are relatively brighter with respect to the OEM halogens than the high beams. It's possible that these high beams just aren't throwing as far down the road... but it's hard for me to say. I wouldn't say they're inadequate at all... just that the highs are not as noticeably brighter than the lows as the OEM bulbs are.

I suspect that it may be a combination of the fact that the Sealight low beams are more noticeably brighter than the OEM than the high beams, and that the Sealight high beams perhaps concentrate a little bit more in the center whereas the OEM halogens highs spill out a bit higher and further down the road..... in my truck at least.

 

I don't have any beam pattern pics but here are some pics that show color from lamps and the match up with the OEM fogs.

 

vOVyz_UORsJcQXLWgQ7DTtwNilmXeLsbj8sKW-H3

 

The fogs are a little bit cooler color if you're crazy picky but I'm happy with it and agree with M2M they match up well.

 

jl7MmgZDe444cOVY-pXSDYOFI3ZrmvZKSTZTw2u5

I just bought my first Silverado. It’s a 2020 Trail Boss. I am assuming the bulbs would be the same as your 19?

Posted
25 minutes ago, cbumgarner1 said:

I just bought my first Silverado. It’s a 2020 Trail Boss. I am assuming the bulbs would be the same as your 19?

Mine is a 2020 as well. I bought the bulbs from the link posted by RottDawgler on the first page of this thread. (H11 low beam and 9005 high beam)

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, nolte said:

Mine is a 2020 as well. I bought the bulbs from the link posted by RottDawgler on the first page of this thread. (H11 low beam and 9005 high beam)

 

 

Thanks for the info. Looking to change mine out. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,406 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...