Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Flak_Jacket said:

That was my educated guess based on past experience with tons of different cars with the cai. Get ready to tune for it or have drivability issues. I have heard that the dealer can flash your truck to the higher tq levels of the newer trucks. It’s just a couple hundred dollars and doesn’t affect warranty. Your truck runs at 20psi of boost pressure and the new ones are 27.

 

I have the 2023 so the intake should be even more noticeable in lower revs where it’s making max torque.

That higher TQ flash is the new Colorado not the Silverado :(

Posted
9 hours ago, Mike Borowski said:

My butt dyno says it pulls harder longer but I can’t prove it. I have the OG 2.7 not the HO. 

 

That is what we call a placebo effect. For as little hp as these types of mods gain they aren't noticeable, just the change in sounds make it seem that way. 

 

I added a OTR (over the radiator) set up to my GTO. They really make a difference and track tested a few mph through the traps faster than stock with much lower IAT's (intake air temps). Even adding that I didn't notice any change except when pulling from a dig, the lower IAT's meant it pulled a bunch less timing and I could tell in the summer in Texas. 

 

Tyler

Posted
26 minutes ago, Amcguy1970 said:

 

That is what we call a placebo effect. For as little hp as these types of mods gain they aren't noticeable, just the change in sounds make it seem that way. 

 

I added a OTR (over the radiator) set up to my GTO. They really make a difference and track tested a few mph through the traps faster than stock with much lower IAT's (intake air temps). Even adding that I didn't notice any change except when pulling from a dig, the lower IAT's meant it pulled a bunch less timing and I could tell in the summer in Texas. 

 

Tyler

Most likely. But I like the sound improvement. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/15/2023 at 7:47 PM, newdude said:

 

Yay! We have a 57mm turbo lol...took long enough to find that out. Hilarious the engineer gave him the gears about not getting their h.o. truck up the ike yet. Was hammering TFL on social media for that months ago, they did a little 0-60 and then crickets ever since.

Posted (edited)
On 2/19/2023 at 6:22 PM, 622Trailboss said:

This video shows the fuel injector location in relation to the valve and cylinder.

 

 

so 10 psi and few less ancillary parts plus lesser transmission for the low tune colorado/canyon model if I heard that right...thing should run forever and get silly good gas mileage, there's the retired guys truck option

 

20 and 27 psi for the other two models, I believe ford ranger 2.3 runs about 20 psi now (and comes with premium 10 Spd auto), and the f-150 2.7 in the 18-22 range 

 

great options out there, inline 4's the way to go, that ranger 2.3/10 speed now called more reliable mid-size than tacoma/ridgleline by consumer reports is a tough competitor on the drivetrain front for the mid-size though, I'm sure the gm's will hang with it but may not have as premium a transmission option, and the gm work truck high mpg's longevity tune won't have competition from the ford, ford would need to do a 10-12 psi version to compete there

Edited by 4banger
Posted (edited)

28163 miles/708.4 hrs  now on 2022 LTD Custom Trail Boss 2.7L oil change #6, sampled. Might share that data here again once we get lab work finished. 

 

Changed oil and AC Delco oil filter yesterday and got the oil spray mentioned by owners here. It's a mess! It was cold, wet, and I had sand/dirt from off road 4X4 required operations.  My physical and mental capacity is diminishing lately so I am slow and confused most of the time.  Note the constant drainage off the oil filter/cooler is notable  and that is directly routed from turbo so this may be a good place to hide alot of oil when checking the oil and variability of dipstick checks. 

 

Havoline Pro-RS 5w30 did pretty well from what we can see at 6783 miles/9% life remaining via OLM  of use and some where between 0.5 - 0.75 qt consumed in last ~1800 miles.  Installed the last container of 6qts of Havoline Pro-RS.  E15 is been used 99% of time. 

 

Comparing wear control to Amsoil ASL signature series a worthy test. I was warned by fellow tribologists that this formulation would NOT protect as well as Amsoil. 

 

Amsoil PI used once in this interval. Amsoil UCL used consistently last 4000 miles. Bought cases of PI and UCL from 02BlackSilverado  ( Nick ). 

 

Air filter left in too long, 9508 miles in a very dusty environment. Clean air filter change 1000 miles ago made a noticable difference in MPG inspite of the Havoline being at its end of friction modifcation in my observation. 

 

Truck runs like a top in very tough conditions here. Can't wear out the loud Duratracs, even plugged, patched from all the old nails, sharp rocks, and crap we pick up they keep working great and get rotated every 5000 miles or so. 

 

Can't say enough good about this engine and design in and out of super rough weather, deep snow, ice, rocks, high altitude operations through passes that I have to breach to get to VA Dr visits almost 3 X a week.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by customboss
my brain broke.....added hrs and OLM bullpoop
Posted
5 hours ago, customboss said:

28163 miles/708.4 hrs  now on 2022 LTD Custom Trail Boss 2.7L oil change #6, sampled. Might share that data here again once we get lab work finished. 

 

Changed oil and AC Delco oil filter yesterday and got the oil spray mentioned by owners here. It's a mess! It was cold, wet, and I had sand/dirt from off road 4X4 required operations.  My physical and mental capacity is diminishing lately so I am slow and confused most of the time.  Note the constant drainage off the oil filter/cooler is notable  and that is directly routed from turbo so this may be a good place to hide alot of oil when checking the oil and variability of dipstick checks. 

 

Havoline Pro-RS 5w30 did pretty well from what we can see at 6783 miles/9% life remaining via OLM  of use and some where between 0.5 - 0.75 qt consumed in last ~1800 miles.  Installed the last container of 6qts of Havoline Pro-RS.  E15 is been used 99% of time. 

 

Comparing wear control to Amsoil ASL signature series a worthy test. I was warned by fellow tribologists that this formulation would NOT protect as well as Amsoil. 

 

Amsoil PI used once in this interval. Amsoil UCL used consistently last 4000 miles. Bought cases of PI and UCL from 02BlackSilverado  ( Nick ). 

 

Air filter left in too long, 9508 miles in a very dusty environment. Clean air filter change 1000 miles ago made a noticable difference in MPG inspite of the Havoline being at its end of friction modifcation in my observation. 

 

Truck runs like a top in very tough conditions here. Can't wear out the loud Duratracs, even plugged, patched from all the old nails, sharp rocks, and crap we pick up they keep working great and get rotated every 5000 miles or so. 

 

Can't say enough good about this engine and design in and out of super rough weather, deep snow, ice, rocks, high altitude operations through passes that I have to breach to get to VA Dr visits almost 3 X a week.  

 

 

I assume you will decide if you will stick with havoline after oil analysis? Will you go back to amsoil if you don’t like the results? 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 622Trailboss said:

I assume you will decide if you will stick with havoline after oil analysis? Will you go back to amsoil if you don’t like the results? 

Yes on both accounts. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

So i have installed the Airiad intake replacement tube. I didn't install the Airaid Dry filter. I had it on for about 500 miles.  

 

Positives

1. Sound - There is a slight increase in what i call good turbo noises. Nothing earth shattering just barely noticeable.

2. The noticeable 4 cylinder grown is slightly reduced due the to increase in turbo noises.

3. There seems to be a little increase in power in the middle or meat of the RPMs.

4. MPG - Before the install the best 50 mile average MPG indicated on the display was 22.9mpg this was on flat ground with the cruise set at 80mph. After install I achieved displayed 24.2 mpg at the same 80mph on the same road heading in the same direction at roughly the same external temp about 60 degrees.

5. The engine bay looks much better and also looks like you could service many more systems on the engine without having to remove the OEM intake.

6. Install/removal is way easier. This will come into effect later on when having to switch out accessory belts, or other items that require the stock intake tube to be removed.

 

Negatives

1. There is something strange with the low speed drivability, below 1,500 rpms. It idles fine but something just feels off. The transmission seems to act strange and also the engine. I have put the stock intake back on to see if it was just me and the truck went back to normal after a couple drive cycles. I still do not know if if is perception thing though. I will confirm this once i get more time. I will connect my ODBII scanner and data log the MAF and Fuel trims when i get more time. I suspect that the hump coupler combined with the thicker intake tube creates a step just after the MAF causing some low air speed issues that flow over the MAF. I plan to radius the edge of the airaid intake tube and get a straight silicone coupler. These two things will make the aftermarket tube be more like the stock intake tube. Yes there is an acoridan section on the stock intake but its ID is larger than the MAF tube ID. The Airaid intake tube is just slightly smaller ID at the point right after the MAF tube. The rest of the Airaid tube has to be better flowing than stock. The stock tube goes from round to square then square to round. It turns a sharp 90, then into a perforated area resembling a muffler, and then another sharp 90. The airaid is all nice swoopy turns with no changes to the shape, no perforations, and just a slight taper in size just before it ends at the turbo.

 

I drive this truck like I'm 100 years old so the below 1500rpm strangeness is a little annoying to me. If anyone is interested i will sell the complete 205-794 for $150 shipped as they are now $199 new, the air filter is still new in box. If it doesn't sell i will keep it and continue to try to improve and refine the design this spring and summer. I will report back with results on both the stock intake data, airaid as shipped and with my modifications to the intake tube.

Edited by Flak_Jacket
Posted
On 3/31/2023 at 1:05 PM, customboss said:

28163 miles/708.4 hrs  now on 2022 LTD Custom Trail Boss 2.7L oil change #6, sampled. Might share that data here again once we get lab work finished. 

 

Changed oil and AC Delco oil filter yesterday and got the oil spray mentioned by owners here. It's a mess! It was cold, wet, and I had sand/dirt from off road 4X4 required operations.  My physical and mental capacity is diminishing lately so I am slow and confused most of the time.  Note the constant drainage off the oil filter/cooler is notable  and that is directly routed from turbo so this may be a good place to hide alot of oil when checking the oil and variability of dipstick checks. 

 

Havoline Pro-RS 5w30 did pretty well from what we can see at 6783 miles/9% life remaining via OLM  of use and some where between 0.5 - 0.75 qt consumed in last ~1800 miles.  Installed the last container of 6qts of Havoline Pro-RS.  E15 is been used 99% of time. 

 

Comparing wear control to Amsoil ASL signature series a worthy test. I was warned by fellow tribologists that this formulation would NOT protect as well as Amsoil. 

 

Amsoil PI used once in this interval. Amsoil UCL used consistently last 4000 miles. Bought cases of PI and UCL from 02BlackSilverado  ( Nick ). 

 

Air filter left in too long, 9508 miles in a very dusty environment. Clean air filter change 1000 miles ago made a noticable difference in MPG inspite of the Havoline being at its end of friction modifcation in my observation. 

 

Truck runs like a top in very tough conditions here. Can't wear out the loud Duratracs, even plugged, patched from all the old nails, sharp rocks, and crap we pick up they keep working great and get rotated every 5000 miles or so. 

 

Can't say enough good about this engine and design in and out of super rough weather, deep snow, ice, rocks, high altitude operations through passes that I have to breach to get to VA Dr visits almost 3 X a week.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Test 6 went pretty well. Wear control is exceptional.

 

Used less oil over drain but its apparent that this engine will begin consuming oil around ~5000 miles of use and it seems its a design issue. 

 

At 6000 miles the MPG benefits of Havoline are giving it up, maybe an earlier air filter change would have helped lower oil usage even further.

 

Lots of rough winter weather and in 4WD on this interval. 

 

The lower ash content Havoline with about 25% Estolide base oils did hold up well. 75% of the oil is GRP III. 

 

I THINK the lower ash content is less easy to be consumed as its oil usage was about 25-30% less than the last two intervals. 

 

Hope this last full test for me is helpful to others running this wonderful mill.  Will go to SyntheticAdvantage TUNER in future if I test it at all. 

 

 

 

 

Screenshot2023-04-0514_04_20.thumb.png.83296e1e8e93f5488770880c0d309202.png

Screenshot 2023-04-05 14.02.41.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Looping back to this, now that fingers crossed all the wet weather here in California is gone for awhile. Im going to revisit the E85 fuel topic, I’m going to exclusively run full tanks of E85 for a few months and will publish the data. I also got a scanner capable of logging data per customboss’s rec many months ago.

 

Currently as of today I have a full tank of 91 I will use to compare when I switch to full tank of E85.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/23/2023 at 6:41 AM, Mike Borowski said:

That higher TQ flash is the new Colorado not the Silverado :(

well, if we have the high output 310hp/430tq same as the Colorado zr2 then stands to reason we have the same flash and same 27 psi boost peak, or better it said...the zr2 gets the Silverado flash for it's top model and optional upgrade 😉

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, 4banger said:

well, if we have the high output 310hp/430tq same as the Colorado zr2 then stands to reason we have the same flash and same 27 psi boost peak, or better it said...the zr2 gets the Silverado flash for it's top model and optional upgrade 😉

 

 

 

Yes HO in the 1/2 ton and HO in the Colorado/Canyon are the same.  The updated 8 speed changes/tuning would be the only difference.  The Turbo Plus (310hp 390tq) and the HO are the same mechanically, just change in tune state.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Any of you seen a 2.7L turbo with high mileage yet? Thinking of getting a 2019 with 34K and I'm questioning reliability and longevity...help!

Edited by glmack10
Word missing
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
    • On my wife's 2020 Blazer (~69000 miles), we started to notice the brakes pulsating at faster speeds. Typically around town you don't notice anything, but highway/interstate driving you will notice it. I decided to pull of the front tires and look at the brakes. I figured with the milage, the pads should be wearing out to their life span, but they actually looked decent. Still with "meat" on them. One pad has a ridge wearing in it, and that same rotor is showing the ridge too. That's not the concerning part...the other rotor appears to have a raised bump on it!  The picture make it look like a pimple! Very odd and strange! NOTE: These are the factory brakes and rotors.   I'm attaching pictures of the front brakes and what they look like ate ~69000 miles.
    • 2024 Chevrolet 2500 HD Custom 6.6 Gas Canadian built Truck  I tried to search for my previous thread on this topic but cant find it so my apoligies  for starting another one    #1   Since we have owned our truck purchased new it has this strange noise after using the remote start function  you press the remote start and you hear it start but right at the end of it starting it almost seems like it wants to start again after the truck is running .   There is no gap in time it is right at the end of the start . Almost sounds like when you have started a car/truck and its running and then you try and start it again and you get that grinding noise ,sort of     #2  You can only hear this if you are standing outside of the truck and near the truck  you cant hear it when you start the truck from inside  the cab . So it may very well be happening when starting the truck that way as in normally    #3   This only happens when it is started after sitting . For how long I don't know but it happens after sitting overnight for sure and it wont do it if you stop the engine after starting and then start it again  I have had it in to the Dealership before concerning this but they did not have the truck  when it was cold to hear it . Now its back in the Dealership left it overnight so they could possibly hear the problem . They said they tried and nothing happened . Well they did not know what they were listening for . I started the truck remotely and BINGO it makes the noise . Oh that sounds weird they say . We need to look into it ! I have left for this week at the Dealership    Does your 2024 2500 HD gas do this ?  Any of you fellas care to take the time and trouble to film this operation from a cold start  so I can hear what your sound like  Really  would like to know if this is anormal sound  Thank You Fellas !!
    • 2026 Z71.  The other day I was backing a trailer into the barn.  The alarm was going off just because the trailer was in the field of the warning sensors when you get too close to something.  For some reason now the warning alarm doesn't work anymore.  It used to go off when I was just normally backing my truck into garage.  I still have the guidelines in the back up camera.  Is there a button or something to push to turn the sound/Alarm on and off?  I have the touch screen in this truck.  There isn't a "P" on the dash except for the parking brake.  I can't find anything in the touch screen under settings or vehicle.  Thank you in advance.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...