Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, VicFirth said:

Check this out.

 

 

Great video. I worked in the Cummins R&D group that Roger England lead. I was the Cummins lead scientist for Cummins Premium Blue Restore. Valvoline just blended for us after we formulated the product with their R&D scientists. The ISX 15L ( not ISB ) engine was our test mule and the requirement was to remove as close to 100% of deposits on high mileage HD diesel engines. I achieved 96% on first run on a used ISX with 1,000,000 miles on it at Jamestown NY HD plant in 2014.  
Roger left Cummins not long after that. His predecessor Shawn Whitaker left Cummins for Chevron HD lubes in 2013 and I worked on low no ZDTP lubes with him. See a pattern! 
 

I was mentored and taught by Don Carver when I was a US Navy Helo crewman and Swimmer in the late 1970’s when Roger England was a custodian at Cummins R&D center. No S-H-I-T ! Two Indiana poor boys working our way up the chain. 
The Iranians took our embassy in 1979 in Tehran and my tribological career was put on hold to go smack down the Mullahs gunboat navy.

 

Roger needs to let Tim Caudill speak more, he’s smart and has probably 50 years test cell experience !  Roger is a VP now at Valvoline and good for him. 
Thanks for sharing. 


Proud of this gem from

my career. 
IMG_8456.thumb.jpeg.a41e32f94e7db05fa17b77bce6036928.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by customboss
Add belt buckle from mark martin 6
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, VicFirth said:

Check this out.

 

 

If I had to guess what the Mumbai Valvo lab synthesized it’s a version of this unique cleaner. Probably using as a multifunctional additive too. 
IMG_8455.thumb.png.db9f7ccec20f9266ff204aabc65d64e1.png

 

 

Edited by customboss
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, customboss said:

Great video. I worked in the Cummins R&D group that Roger England lead. I was the Cummins lead scientist for Cummins Blue Restore. Valvoline just blended for us after we formulated the product with their R&D scientists. The ISX 15L ( not ISB ) engine was our test mule and the requirement was to remove as close to 100% of deposits on high mileage HD diesel engines. I achieved 96% on first run on a used ISX with 1,000,000 miles on it at Jamestown NY HD plant in 2014.  
Roger left Cummins not long after that. His predecessor Shawn Whitaker left Cummins for Chevron HD lubes in 2013 and I worked on low no ZDTP lubes with him. See a pattern! 
 

I was mentored and taught by Don Carver when I was a US Navy Helo crewman and Swimmer in the late 1970’s when Roger England was a custodian at Cummins R&D center. No ******! Two Indiana poor boys working our way up the chain. 
The Iranians took our embassy in 1979 in Tehran and my tribological career was put on hold to go smack down the Mullahs gunboat navy.

 

Roger needs to let Tim Caudill speak more he’s smart!  Roger is a VP now at Valvoline and good for him. 
Thanks for sharing. 


Proud of this gem from

my career. 
IMG_8456.thumb.jpeg.a41e32f94e7db05fa17b77bce6036928.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awesome! Thanks for sharing that.  👍

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, customboss said:

If I had to guess what the Mumbai Valvo lab synthesized it’s a version of this unique cleaner. Probably using as a multifunctional additive too. 
IMG_8455.thumb.png.db9f7ccec20f9266ff204aabc65d64e1.png

 

 

 

If I heard correctly (from the video), polar esters are good at keeping/mitigating piston deposits at bay.  However, Roger said this oil actually goes even further.

 

What's kind of interesting though is in the beginning, they mention how well the original could clean. So does it depend then on the ester type and quantity?  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, VicFirth said:

 

If I heard correctly (from the video), polar esters are good at keeping/mitigating piston deposits at bay.  However, Roger said this oil actually goes even further.

 

What's kind of interesting though is in the beginning, they mention how well the original could clean. So does it depend then on the ester type and quantity?  

The original IN MY OPINION 😉was formulated to have base oils remove the carbon deposits around ring lands fast! Why? Because I was tasked with the impossible and the mechanical engineers at Cummins wanted me to fail as a chem engineer. I used exotic concoction of base oils not additives. We threw a CK4 add pack in just to meet specs for HD diesels. Also formulated it as a 0w-35 but we called it 10w-30 because every new engine in that time was spec’ing that for efficiency and cooling reasons. Even Grumpy Bear was impressed with the product. Note my original formulation was cut and cheapened after I departed because it was so expensive. Valvoline was a BLENDER and looks like Roger got Mumbai to synthesize my original recipe albeit less aggressive via a constituent additive that does not show up in normal testing. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, customboss said:

The original IN MY OPINION 😉was formulated to have base oils remove the carbon deposits around ring lands fast! Why? Because I was tasked with the impossible and the mechanical engineers at Cummins wanted me to fail as a chem engineer. I used exotic concoction of base oils not additives. We threw a CK4 add pack in just to meet specs for HD diesels. Also formulated it as a 0w-35 but we called it 10w-30 because every new engine in that time was spec’ing that for efficiency and cooling reasons. Even Grumpy Bear was impressed with the product. Note my original formulation was cut and cheapened after I departed because it was so expensive. Valvoline was a BLENDER and looks like Roger got Mumbai to synthesize my original recipe albeit less aggressive via a constituent additive that does not show up in normal testing. 

The original was a lubricating solvent with such a high flash point it would not volatize off. I used experience from my aerospace tribology work in military and airlines to develop the right mix. The base oils also acted as dispersants and surfactants. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I was teamed with a certified engine rater from Valvoline on initial testing at Jamestown and he was shocked when we tore down the million mile ISX and restored it to like new cleanliness inside. We did change the oil filter during the non stop destruction of engine test cell cycle and we used emissions readings, blowby readings and constant oil analysis draws.  
 

BTW the flushing oil between oils tested in a given test cell engine is what pros do. The one off oil analysis and mixing we see here by some is not good science but science costs $$$$. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I wonder then if oils like Amsoil SS or HPL could clean as well as this Restore & Protect (current version not the older).  When Valvoline says they know of no other oil that can do this, I suppose they are referring to your off the shelf oils.

 

However, Amsoil SS and even HPL likely don't contain nearly as much high solvency ester as the original Restore & Protect that you were involved with formulating.  So maybe they can't clean as well as some have suggested? 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

I wonder then if oils like Amsoil SS or HPL could clean as well as this Restore & Protect (current version not the older).  When Valvoline says they know of no other oil that can do this, I suppose they are referring to your off the shelf oils.

 

However, Amsoil SS and even HPL likely don't contain nearly as much high solvency ester as the original Restore & Protect that you were involved with formulating.  So maybe they can't clean as well as some have suggested? 

Most engine oil formulas including Amsoil etc are historically keep clean. Not deep clean. Amsoil in past 3 or so years is making an effort at cleaning. 
 

HPL is new brand and I’m brain dead from dementia from TBI in military so no more deep testing for me.

So it seems from what you’ve shared and Grumpy tested HPL  can clean. 

Redline was a very good cleaning oil before they went majority PAO. They just overkill additives IMHO. 

 

The diester based oil that I can’t remember the brand name was a very good solvent. 
 

The key question is what do you want to clean? Remember in chemistry like removes like. The carbon deposits for a particular engine piston ring system is mostly fuel related. Not just engine oil blowby. 
 

Finally to answer your question no. Restore and Protect is formulated to clean constantly. 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

Good points.  I wonder if they're using alkylated naphthalene in this new R&P oil. 

Not as we might think of from XOM. Most likely some form of a chemistry synthesized from napthenics.  

  • Like 1
Posted

I think it's fair to say at this point that this oil is using some novel ingredient, and it actually does work.  If Roger's words are to be taken as is, it works even better than the higher ester based oils for cleaning.  

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, VicFirth said:

I think it's fair to say at this point that this oil is using some novel ingredient, and it actually does work.  If Roger's words are to be taken as is, it works even better than the higher ester based oils for cleaning.  

Yes over time because they didn’t want to overload oil filters like we did with original CPB Restore. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...