Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How outrageous does a lie have to be before your backers puke...

 

".....50 MILLION dollars spent on condoms for Hamas." 

 

image.jpeg.13c03883c6c3ce9fdaed45e17416d61b.jpeg

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

So why didn’t you correct the record? I knew it was a mistake because  I’m well read. You usually have to wait a bit before it shakes out. I bet you believe Russian collusion too, it took years before that was resolved. Remember the 21 intelligence officials who said that was true and the laptop was false? They’ve been stripped of their clearance as well as credibility. The 50 million dollars for condoms is true. Where they go is different. And just as outrageous. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

So why didn’t you correct the record? I knew it was a mistake because  I’m well read. You usually have to wait a bit before it shakes out. I bet you believe Russian collusion too, it took years before that was resolved. Remember the 21 intelligence officials who said that was true and the laptop was false? They’ve been stripped of their clearance as well as credibility. The 50 million dollars for condoms is true. Where they go is different. And just as outrageous. 

 

So....this wasn't outrageous enough? 

:eek:

 

Little brother, fact checking isn't my job. That one belongs to the speaker, not the listener. You know better than that. And dragging other incidents into the conversation is just muddy water. I didn't speak to anything else. Stay on point and stay clear. 

 

This one was as obvious as a fisherman claiming to have landed a 100 pound Muskie. 

https://www.fieldandstream.com/fishing/the-biggest-world-record-muskies-ever-caught

 

When the lie is that large and that obvious then mister it is on the speaker to provide the PROOF. Your not going to be awarded the record on Internet scuttlebutt, it's not proof. No proof; then the speaker needs to remain silent. 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

So....this wasn't outrageous enough? 

:eek:

 

Little brother, fact checking isn't my job. That one belongs to the speaker, not the listener. You know better than that. And dragging other incidents into the conversation is just muddy water. I didn't speak to anything else. Stay on point and stay clear. 

 

This one was as obvious as a fisherman claiming to have landed a 100 pound Muskie. 

https://www.fieldandstream.com/fishing/the-biggest-world-record-muskies-ever-caught

 

When the lie is that large and that obvious then mister it is on the speaker to provide the PROOF. Your not going to be awarded the record on Internet scuttlebutt, it's not proof. No proof; then the speaker needs to remain silent. 

 

 

 

 

I’m a realist. I understand that a seeker of knowledge may have to rely on people who may not have the best interest of the seeker. The statement may have some facts, like expense. So put the destination wrong to embarrass the seeker who obviously doesn’t have the time to research the information himself. Much like buying a vehicle following the manufacturer recommendations. Only to find out that at 100k miles that information has a negative effect on longevity. So you make a change and you never do that again. You make adjustments. I imagine that adjustments have been made. I have no doubt it won’t be the first time. Rational thinking people understand that knowing the intent is pure. Other people laugh. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’m a realist. I understand that a seeker of knowledge may have to rely on people who may not have the best interest of the seeker. The statement may have some facts, like expense. So put the destination wrong to embarrass the seeker who obviously doesn’t have the time to research the information himself. Much like buying a vehicle following the manufacturer recommendations. Only to find out that at 100k miles that information has a negative effect on longevity. So you make a change and you never do that again. You make adjustments. I imagine that adjustments have been made. I have no doubt it won’t be the first time. Rational thinking people understand that knowing the intent is pure. Other people laugh. 

No you are fully sucked into the BIG LIE. You are smarter than that but it’s the truth. Right now the current administration is whitewashing the lies. They have to because the chief gangster got a get outta jail card for 4 years. We are about to come to the time where a citizen follows the constitution or follows the lies. 

Posted
Just now, customboss said:

No you are fully sucked into the BIG LIE. You are smarter than that but it’s the truth. Right now the current administration is whitewashing the lies. They have to because the chief gangster got a get outta jail card for 4 years. We are about to come to the time where a citizen follows the constitution or follows the lies. 

So you’re going to screw up the thread again. Like usual. We were general, you made it political.

Posted
4 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

So you’re going to screw up the thread again. Like usual. We were general, you made it political.

How do you separate the lies from the current administration? The condom lie is from the lier in chief directly. 

Posted
1 minute ago, customboss said:

How do you separate the lies from the current administration? The condom lie is from the lier in chief directly. 

The destination was wrong. The rest was facts. Of course you’re beyond help. I’ll trade a few protesters being freed to thousands through the border and drugs. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

The destination was wrong. The rest was facts. Of course you’re beyond help. I’ll trade a few protesters being freed to thousands through the border and drugs. 

Protesters who beat and KILLED COPS.   Listen Stan,  I have stated clearly I will call out anything here that hides as common sense but is a governance issue.  The constitution is our ECM of governance if you corrupt the constitutional RULE OF LAW, then you corrupt the ECM of this country and we won't run rightly. 

 

If being a Patriot and wanting honesty and law to guide regardless of what the latest trend is call me a traitor to your cause. 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, customboss said:

Protesters who beat and KILLED COPS.   Listen Stan,  I have stated clearly I will call out anything here that hides as common sense but is a governance issue.  The constitution is our ECM of governance if you corrupt the constitutional RULE OF LAW, then you corrupt the ECM of this country and we won't run rightly. 

 

If being a Patriot and wanting honesty and law to guide regardless of what the latest trend is call me a traitor to your cause. 

 

 

It’s amazing to me a person can be so wrong, like you. Thankfully you’re in the minority. By the way a policeman died the next day from natural causes. The stress the day before may have contributed, but is listed as natural causes. One female who served is the only person died the day of.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

It’s amazing to me a person can be so wrong, like you. Thankfully you’re in the minority. By the way a policeman died the next day from natural causes. The stress the day before may have contributed, but is listed as natural causes. One female who served is the only person died the day of.

If I had been there at capitol and I had my PIG, that lied to AF gal, would have been one of hundreds before they overran me. 

Edited by customboss
Punctuation
Posted
9 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

WOW!!

He’s fun to play with, until the teacher catches on. Then stuff disappears. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

The destination was wrong. The rest was facts. Of course you’re beyond help. I’ll trade a few protesters being freed to thousands through the border and drugs. 

 

Supporting documents? A copy of the OFFICIAL investigative report perhaps?

 

 I haven't bought any condoms lately but seems like allot. All I have SOLID to go on is his video taped televised statement which aired on all networks, left right and center. He said what he said. 

 

Better one today. He's sure DEI is responsible for the air crash. But when pushed by the press pool on the source of his remarks it boiled down to "Well....it could be true". 😬 IT COULD BE TRUE?? :dunno:  Really??

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That should answer the maximum depth difference between the stock and the PPE so its not hugely lower. As to the PML pan, they don't make any claims that it fits the L8T with the same transmission and in fact leave their information confusing, however on the surface it says "for Duramax" and so its hard to say. I know a while back and not sure which brand it was that specifically stated that the extra capacity pan that particular company made did NOT fit the gas version. 
    • There are several versions of the 5100's. Some for stock height, some for leveled, some for lifted.    Side note. I finally had a chance to tow with my 30' gooseneck with about 10,000 lbs of material on it this past week. Hands down the 5100's made the trailer towing much more stable and comfortable. I even had 10 cmu blocks in the bed. What a difference over the stock shocks. 
    • According to PML, the stock pan is 4.3" deep - (PML info): Dimensions: at deepest area, PML pan is 7 inches, stock pan is 4.3 inches    PPE is 5.4" so roughly 1.1" deeper than stock
    • I had not realized that PPE has come out with a version of a cast aluminum oil pan specific to being able to fit onto the 10L1000 with the L8T engine sometime this spring. I was doubting that anyone would come out with something beyond what Dorman had in more of a direct factory pan swap. I see from one comment that is on the PPE site that they found the pan to be tighter to install then the factory unit and having to flex the exhaust down to fit it. I didn't lookup any specs if they have any as per how much lower it hangs but as it holds more oil and has fins outside the pan it would no doubt hang a certain amount lower.    I looked back at the site and they do have some depth measurements to get a rough comparison to the factory pan total height or hang down if you will at the front and rear of the pan so that will give a good idea how much further down this pan would end up being for ground clearance issues.    2024-2026 GM 6.6L Gas 10L1000 Heavy-Duty Cast Transmission Pan – Pacific Performance Engineering    
    • I'm in constant amazement over the number of people that do oil maintenance by how they feel, what they were told, what materials cost, what brand A claims vs brand B.     Come to think of it, this behavior isn't exclusive to oil. 🤔 They drive this way too. 😬   There is a 20 plus page thread on BITOG on Mobil 1 Advanced Clean vs Valvoline Restore and Protect it would be amusing if it were not so........humanly pitiful.   Last Sunday we were are sitting at services and listening to a speaker talk about Jesus parable of the wide and narrow gates and he said something that hadn't dawned on me but totally fit the way people in general are about just about everything. He said there are so few people on the narrow path leading to a good reward not because the the narrow gate was hidden or hard to find but because the wide gate leading to a bad end it so darn easy and uncomplicated to follow!!!             
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...