Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How outrageous does a lie have to be before your backers puke...

 

".....50 MILLION dollars spent on condoms for Hamas." 

 

image.jpeg.13c03883c6c3ce9fdaed45e17416d61b.jpeg

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

So why didn’t you correct the record? I knew it was a mistake because  I’m well read. You usually have to wait a bit before it shakes out. I bet you believe Russian collusion too, it took years before that was resolved. Remember the 21 intelligence officials who said that was true and the laptop was false? They’ve been stripped of their clearance as well as credibility. The 50 million dollars for condoms is true. Where they go is different. And just as outrageous. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

So why didn’t you correct the record? I knew it was a mistake because  I’m well read. You usually have to wait a bit before it shakes out. I bet you believe Russian collusion too, it took years before that was resolved. Remember the 21 intelligence officials who said that was true and the laptop was false? They’ve been stripped of their clearance as well as credibility. The 50 million dollars for condoms is true. Where they go is different. And just as outrageous. 

 

So....this wasn't outrageous enough? 

:eek:

 

Little brother, fact checking isn't my job. That one belongs to the speaker, not the listener. You know better than that. And dragging other incidents into the conversation is just muddy water. I didn't speak to anything else. Stay on point and stay clear. 

 

This one was as obvious as a fisherman claiming to have landed a 100 pound Muskie. 

https://www.fieldandstream.com/fishing/the-biggest-world-record-muskies-ever-caught

 

When the lie is that large and that obvious then mister it is on the speaker to provide the PROOF. Your not going to be awarded the record on Internet scuttlebutt, it's not proof. No proof; then the speaker needs to remain silent. 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

So....this wasn't outrageous enough? 

:eek:

 

Little brother, fact checking isn't my job. That one belongs to the speaker, not the listener. You know better than that. And dragging other incidents into the conversation is just muddy water. I didn't speak to anything else. Stay on point and stay clear. 

 

This one was as obvious as a fisherman claiming to have landed a 100 pound Muskie. 

https://www.fieldandstream.com/fishing/the-biggest-world-record-muskies-ever-caught

 

When the lie is that large and that obvious then mister it is on the speaker to provide the PROOF. Your not going to be awarded the record on Internet scuttlebutt, it's not proof. No proof; then the speaker needs to remain silent. 

 

 

 

 

I’m a realist. I understand that a seeker of knowledge may have to rely on people who may not have the best interest of the seeker. The statement may have some facts, like expense. So put the destination wrong to embarrass the seeker who obviously doesn’t have the time to research the information himself. Much like buying a vehicle following the manufacturer recommendations. Only to find out that at 100k miles that information has a negative effect on longevity. So you make a change and you never do that again. You make adjustments. I imagine that adjustments have been made. I have no doubt it won’t be the first time. Rational thinking people understand that knowing the intent is pure. Other people laugh. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I’m a realist. I understand that a seeker of knowledge may have to rely on people who may not have the best interest of the seeker. The statement may have some facts, like expense. So put the destination wrong to embarrass the seeker who obviously doesn’t have the time to research the information himself. Much like buying a vehicle following the manufacturer recommendations. Only to find out that at 100k miles that information has a negative effect on longevity. So you make a change and you never do that again. You make adjustments. I imagine that adjustments have been made. I have no doubt it won’t be the first time. Rational thinking people understand that knowing the intent is pure. Other people laugh. 

No you are fully sucked into the BIG LIE. You are smarter than that but it’s the truth. Right now the current administration is whitewashing the lies. They have to because the chief gangster got a get outta jail card for 4 years. We are about to come to the time where a citizen follows the constitution or follows the lies. 

Posted
Just now, customboss said:

No you are fully sucked into the BIG LIE. You are smarter than that but it’s the truth. Right now the current administration is whitewashing the lies. They have to because the chief gangster got a get outta jail card for 4 years. We are about to come to the time where a citizen follows the constitution or follows the lies. 

So you’re going to screw up the thread again. Like usual. We were general, you made it political.

Posted
4 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

So you’re going to screw up the thread again. Like usual. We were general, you made it political.

How do you separate the lies from the current administration? The condom lie is from the lier in chief directly. 

Posted
1 minute ago, customboss said:

How do you separate the lies from the current administration? The condom lie is from the lier in chief directly. 

The destination was wrong. The rest was facts. Of course you’re beyond help. I’ll trade a few protesters being freed to thousands through the border and drugs. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

The destination was wrong. The rest was facts. Of course you’re beyond help. I’ll trade a few protesters being freed to thousands through the border and drugs. 

Protesters who beat and KILLED COPS.   Listen Stan,  I have stated clearly I will call out anything here that hides as common sense but is a governance issue.  The constitution is our ECM of governance if you corrupt the constitutional RULE OF LAW, then you corrupt the ECM of this country and we won't run rightly. 

 

If being a Patriot and wanting honesty and law to guide regardless of what the latest trend is call me a traitor to your cause. 

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, customboss said:

Protesters who beat and KILLED COPS.   Listen Stan,  I have stated clearly I will call out anything here that hides as common sense but is a governance issue.  The constitution is our ECM of governance if you corrupt the constitutional RULE OF LAW, then you corrupt the ECM of this country and we won't run rightly. 

 

If being a Patriot and wanting honesty and law to guide regardless of what the latest trend is call me a traitor to your cause. 

 

 

It’s amazing to me a person can be so wrong, like you. Thankfully you’re in the minority. By the way a policeman died the next day from natural causes. The stress the day before may have contributed, but is listed as natural causes. One female who served is the only person died the day of.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

It’s amazing to me a person can be so wrong, like you. Thankfully you’re in the minority. By the way a policeman died the next day from natural causes. The stress the day before may have contributed, but is listed as natural causes. One female who served is the only person died the day of.

If I had been there at capitol and I had my PIG, that lied to AF gal, would have been one of hundreds before they overran me. 

Edited by customboss
Punctuation
Posted
9 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

WOW!!

He’s fun to play with, until the teacher catches on. Then stuff disappears. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

The destination was wrong. The rest was facts. Of course you’re beyond help. I’ll trade a few protesters being freed to thousands through the border and drugs. 

 

Supporting documents? A copy of the OFFICIAL investigative report perhaps?

 

 I haven't bought any condoms lately but seems like allot. All I have SOLID to go on is his video taped televised statement which aired on all networks, left right and center. He said what he said. 

 

Better one today. He's sure DEI is responsible for the air crash. But when pushed by the press pool on the source of his remarks it boiled down to "Well....it could be true". 😬 IT COULD BE TRUE?? :dunno:  Really??

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 3.41 Kroger’s in Montgomery TX
    • I really wanted to go to the Fox 2.5's But they were like ~$1,500 vs ~$425 for the Bilsteins. And my research on FOX shocks was that they do not have a great reputation for longevity. I am sure they the FOX's are fantastic, but I know from experience the Bilsteins are rock solid for at least 150k miles. 
    • Conditions for Meeting a Cold Start   The ignition voltage is between 10 and 15 V. The barometric pressure (BARO) is more than 75 kPa. The engine coolant temperature (ECT) at start-up is less than 42°C (108°F). The intake air temperature (IAT) is between 2–32°C (36–90°F). The engine is OFF for greater than 6 hours or the following conditions must be met: The start-up IAT minus start-up ECT are within 12°C (22°F). The start-up ECT minus start-up IAT are within 50°C (90°F). Fuel level is between 25 and 75 %.   Circuit/System Verification Verify that all I/M System Status indicators report YES, and that no I/M Test DTCs are present.If any I/M Test DTCs are set Refer to Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) List - Vehicle. If no I/M Test DTCs are set All OK. Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) System Set Procedure   Warning: Refer to Road Test Warning. Note: Do NOT touch the accelerator pedal until told to do so. A change in TP Sensor angle or an increase in engine speed may invalidate this portion of the test.   Note: An I/M Test DTC will not be stored or erased from the ECU except at the end of trip processing, which occurs 5 s after ignition OFF.   Ensure that the vehicle meets the conditions for a cold start listed above. If the EVAP I/M System Status indicator displays NO, perform the EVAP Service bay test if applicable. Turn OFF all of the accessories; HVAC system, other electrical loads, including aftermarket/add-on equipment, etc., and open the hood.   Set the vehicle parking brake and ensure the vehicle is in park for automatic transmission or neutral for manual transmission.   Start and idle the engine for 2 min.   Close the hood, release the parking brake and Accelerate at part throttle to 72–80 km/h (45–50 mph) with this speed maintained until the engine reaches operating temperature, 8–10 min.   Continue operation under these conditions for an additional 6 min.   Accelerate at part throttle to 90 km/h (55 mph) with this speed maintained for 2 min.   Release the accelerator pedal for at least 10 s. This will allow the vehicle to enter the decel fuel cut off.   Safely stop the vehicle, with the engine in drive for automatic or neutral with the clutch pedal depressed and parking brake applied for manual. Allow the vehicle to idle for 2 min.   Shift the vehicle to park for automatic and neutral for manual. Turn OFF the ignition and exit the vehicle. Do NOT disturb the vehicle for 45 min.   Observe the Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) System Status with a scan tool. All of the I/M System Status indicators should display YES.   If the EVAP I/M System Status indicator displays NO, turn OFF the ignition, ensure that the vehicle meets the conditions for a cold start, and repeat steps 6-11 three more times, or until the EVAP I/M System Status indicator transitions to YES. If the indicator continues to display NO, refer to the Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) System DTC Table to identify the DTCs that did not run.   If any of the I/M System Status indicators display NO, refer to the Inspection/Maintenance (I/M) System DTC Table for the indicator which did not display YES. The I/M System DTC Table identifies the DTCs associated with each I/M System Status Indicator.   Observe the I/M Test DTC information with a scan tool. Verify there are no I/M Test DTCs present. If an I/M Test DTC is set, diagnose the DTC using the Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) List - Vehicle and refer to Inspection/Maintenance System Check.   Observe the engine DTC information with a scan tool. Verify no DTCs are present. If a DTC is set, diagnose using the Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) List - Vehicle. After repairs, perform the Inspection/Maintenance Complete System Set Procedure to verify no further DTCs are set.       Looks like one procedure to me.  Repeated as necessary.
    • My 2020 AT4 6.2 has had the valve spring issue addressed at ~200 miles, front cover/pump replaced at 18k, water pump at 34k and idler pully at 65k.  I would agree with ditching by 100k unless you elect to go with upgraded hardware...say built 10l80 and an lt4 or l8p swap.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...