Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, customboss said:

BTW this has become a good discussion. Whether you agree with current situation or not. 
Peckish synapse discussion is helpful. We all want what’s best for our families and country. 

I can’t wait to see how all the tariff stuff plays out. Do I think prices could rise short term, possibly. Can you imagine if our industrial complex gets stronger. We can have more influence over our advisory’s by increasing oil production? Stop Iran from getting money through oil unless they behave.  All these policy’s aren’t new. Kennedy, Regan and Clinton did different versions of the same thing and we prospered. It’s not Rocket Science. It’s a path well worn.

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I can’t wait to see how all the tariff stuff plays out. Do I think prices could rise short term, possibly. Can you imagine if our industrial complex gets stronger. We can have more influence over our advisory’s by increasing oil production? Stop Iran from getting money through oil unless they behave.  All these policy’s aren’t new. Kennedy, Regan and Clinton did different versions of the same thing and we prospered. It’s not Rocket Science. It’s a path well worn.

We are gonna see. Putting tariffs on our two

largest trading partners is a brutal

play and tariffs are taxes on consumers so how long that tax lasts while we leverage them is TBD. 

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, customboss said:

We are gonna see. Putting tariffs on our two

largest trading partners is a brutal

play and tariffs are taxes on consumers so how long that tax lasts while we leverage them is TBD. 

Maybe there will be an offset. I agree we’ll see.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, KARNUT said:

You obviously have never been in a situation where you had to depend on other people for information. I guess you expect the most powerful person to go over the government spending report himself. His point obviously is on cutting expenses. That was an example. There are many others. You want to call the most powerful person a liar because someone gave him bad info. You’re being ridiculous. And showing your stripes. I guess you never gave wrong information based on another’s research. I believe in a perfect person. It’s not you. You called a man a liar. He’s definitely not going to do that willingly. It to easy to fact check. I guess you can’t even consider it may have been a setup. You claim not to political, your statement was. You claim to be fair and not judgmental, you obviously were. Then you quote scripture. Hypocritical. 

 

Yea, that's  the reason. :rolleyes: 

 

So, researchers are at fault? For nine years? Lets run that down the rational rabbit hole with the actions in example of a guy named Joe Schmoe. 

 

1.)  Joe hires researchers and they feed him lies, he fires them. Still he hired them and once in awhile someone can fool the best of us. Granted. But if Joe goes many years, a decade say, and can't hire a good ones, then, he's incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

2.) If Joe doesn't fire them and keeps them knowing they are unreliable, he's Incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

3.) If they are competent and feed Joe the truth and he ignores it, then he's just choosing to lie and am by definition a liar. 

 

So Stan, which one is it? You choose. Is a Joe incompetent or a liar. 

 

Why you making this personal? The topic is TRUTH not Trump. It is the topic of the ENTIRE THREAD. :idiot:

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Yea, that's  the reason. :rolleyes: 

 

So, researchers are at fault? For nine years? Lets run that down the rational rabbit hole with the actions in example of a guy named Joe Schmoe. 

 

1.)  Joe hires researchers and they feed him lies, he fires them. Still he hired them and once in awhile someone can fool the best of us. Granted. But if Joe goes many years, a decade say, and can't hire a good ones, then, he's incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

2.) If Joe doesn't fire them and keeps them knowing they are unreliable, he's Incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

3.) If they are competent and feed Joe the truth and he ignores it, then he's just choosing to lie and am by definition a liar. 

 

So Stan, which one is it? You choose. Is a Joe incompetent or a liar. 

 

Why you making this personal? The topic is TRUTH not Trump. It is the topic of the ENTIRE THREAD. :idiot:

 

Really we’re not that stupid. Or maybe you think we or I am. Of course it was about Trump. At least you know where I stand. I think he’s the right person at the right time. You don’t that’s fine every one is entitled to their opinion. If you claim you don’t have one. Brother I don’t believe it for a minute. The man’s been office a few days and he’s had time to vet everyone? Get real. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Yea, that's  the reason. :rolleyes: 

 

So, researchers are at fault? For nine years? Lets run that down the rational rabbit hole with the actions in example of a guy named Joe Schmoe. 

 

1.)  Joe hires researchers and they feed him lies, he fires them. Still he hired them and once in awhile someone can fool the best of us. Granted. But if Joe goes many years, a decade say, and can't hire a good ones, then, he's incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

2.) If Joe doesn't fire them and keeps them knowing they are unreliable, he's Incompetent. Period, full stop.  

 

3.) If they are competent and feed Joe the truth and he ignores it, then he's just choosing to lie and am by definition a liar. 

 

So Stan, which one is it? You choose. Is a Joe incompetent or a liar. 

 

Why you making this personal? The topic is TRUTH not Trump. It is the topic of the ENTIRE THREAD. :idiot:

 

Psssst, #3 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

Really we’re not that stupid. Or maybe you think we or I am. Of course it was about Trump. At least you know where I stand. I think he’s the right person at the right time. You don’t that’s fine every one is entitled to their opinion. If you claim you don’t have one. Brother I don’t believe it for a minute. The man’s been office a few days and he’s had time to vet everyone? Get real. 

 

Let's circle back a few pages to this....

 

On 1/31/2025 at 3:07 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

 

He's sure DEI is responsible for the air crash. But when pushed by the press pool on the source of his remarks it boiled down to "Well....it could be true". 😬 IT COULD BE TRUE?? :dunno:  Really??

 

So he lies. He tells you he's lying and you still think that even when he admits to a lie he's telling the truth? 

 

 :idiot:

 

Go back to the first quote and tell me how I can not possibly draw that conclusion. You have zero defense and yet you insist. 

 

Stan, do you remember my stance on IRRATIONAL ARGUMENTS? Well, you leave me no choice and yet you had one. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted
22 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Let's circle back a few pages to this....

 

 

So he lies. He tells you he's lying and you still think that even when he admits to a lie he's telling the truth? 

 

 :idiot:

 

Go back to the first quote and tell me how I can not possibly draw that conclusion. You have zero defense and yet you insist. 

 

Stan, do you remember my stance on IRRATIONAL ARGUMENTS? Well, you leave me no choice and yet you had one. 

 

 

You’re only convincing me absolutely you were targeting Trump. Sure doesn’t mean absolutely yes. It leaves wiggle room. As he stated as you pointed later. When he said it could be. And as we’re learning it could be true. It a combination of factors or could be a combination of factors. Only a lie in your mind because you want it to be. And that doesn’t make it so. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

You’re only convincing me absolutely you were targeting Trump. Sure doesn’t mean absolutely yes. It leaves wiggle room. As he stated as you pointed later. When he said it could be. And as we’re learning it could be true. It a combination of factors or could be a combination of factors. Only a lie in your mind because you want it to be. And that doesn’t make it so. 

 

 I said I'm not having an irrational argument with you?  You are too intelligent to be this thick. THINK Stanley THINK. 

 

Now, if you must. Have the last word. Be my guest. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted
9 hours ago, KARNUT said:

They’re not many people who could have handled what has come his way in the last 10 years. Just in the last few days Jeffies has called for fighting Trump policy’s in the streets. He gets a pass. Trump says peacefully protest. They say he caused a riot. It’s just so slanted.

I have to clear this up. Trump did say to peacefully protest, but he said it in the beginning of the speech. He then went

on for over an hour about how the election was stolen giving specific details that were very believable. His closing words were to fight like hell and to march over to the capitol.

 

Nobody influenced me to think like this. In fact I was mostly a trump supporter until I did my own due diligence on j6. I thought it was all make believe until I decided to imagine myself being there listening to that speech. I honestly might have stormed the capital too.


He’s such a piece of ****** for that speech.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

We’ve have expressed our thoughts on this and there’s nothing more to gain at this point. I’m going to be happy for the accomplishment that will get us back on course after the destruction and chaos of the last four years. And watching with joy as people begin held against their will are returned to their homes. Especially the children who were sold into unspeakable situations, some already found. Only in this situation because of the policy of the past. Some will happily try to find flaws in the man, we all have them. I will see hope in the future as a country gets set right. Some will joyfully look for bumps in the road, there always are. I will observe the steady movement in the right direction. We’ve seen this movie before we know how it ends. This man did it once. He will do it again. 

Posted

This be me pumping the brakes guys.

 

Admin just tapped me on the shoulder so we can get back on topic OR the tread will get locked down. I prefer it isn't. So let's put the stick in some other none political pot. No pointing, no blaming, just poly-silence. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Y'all had your free time. Stayed civil but lets dial it back a notch. I'd like to discuss this stuff as much as y'all.

i hear this stuff everywhere else, don't need to hear it here too. :)

  • Like 1
Posted

The sermon this Sunday was lifting up people around you. I try to do that. I have a blessed life. I met my wife early in high school an army brat. Used to living a frugal life. Some simple tips to live an upper middle class life on a lower middle class income. Buy a modest first home. Pay it on a fifteen year program. So while my kids were in school we paid off our first mortgage. We shopped at resale shops. My wife drove certified pre owned cars. My wife started working after the last kid started school. All her money was for investments and an IRA. Her first new car was a in 1994 an Impala SS. When we sold it years later it was worth more than we paid for it. She only drove it as a daily for a year recognizing it was an investment. That was just lucky. The second home, the current one we put enough down to equal the previous mortgage paying it off in ten years. By this time the average middle class income was double. The rest of the first home money built our rental on the back of the property. My car addiction was handled with an allowance and my ability to refurbish and turn over classic cars and trucks. Not dinging the budget. I don’t do Starbucks. On trips we do value meals. When I want water on a trip. I go into whatever truck stop I got gas with my tumbler. Put ice fountain water. I have yet to be charged for that. We have never bought new furniture. But we have the best you can buy, many antiques. Most from moving sales or garage sales. Appliances are new. Pretty frugal right? Now our vacation, hobby. Ready, we go to casinos and play cards. About 8-10 times a year multiple nights. Anywhere from 0-8K a year total all paid for from rent from the rental house. How so cheap. We like paigow poker. Sometimes all afternoon  usually 200$ each that’s if we had a bad day. In return our meals, lodging and drinks are comp. Sometimes I wonder to slots. Usually they comp free play. They usually have drawings, slot torn tournaments etc. This hobby, vacation only works if you have willpower. They are designed to suck money out of you. We hunkered down hard the first part of our life. Then it was a breeze. All while building a family business. Talk about a grind. But that’s another more interesting story.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...