Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey all, 

 

First post, long time lurker. I drive a 2015 Sierra All Terrain with the 5.3L . I am planning on doing a few mods once my warranty runs out in about a year's time. What i have been considering is the Borla ATAK stainless steel cat-back exhaust system with split side exits with the black tips and getting a cold air intake system as well. I've looked at the K&N 71 series blackhawk induction cold air intake system or the Airaid MXP cold air intake system. Has anyone had any experience with these products? Is it worth my money installing these? Will I get much of a drone when my truck is in V4 mode? I know they won't give me huge power gains, but i'm mostly looking for a good rumbling sound from my truck. 

 

Thanks to all in advance!

 

Crunchy

 

 

Edited by CrunchyBlack
Posted

I have the borla atak with afe power cai. No drone at all and don't notice v4 mode. Borla did a really nice job acoustically keeping drone outside of cabin. Cruising 60, 70, 80mph you barley notice exhaust. Radio on about 20% with a/c you can't even hear it. Passing gear sounds aggressive and I love it.  W.O.T. the sound is a beast. If planning on headers later I would prolly think of the touring or S-type. I gained about 25rwhp on dyno before tune on my 2018 Sierra 6.2. 

Posted
14 hours ago, BeerPwningTexan said:

I have the borla atak with afe power cai. No drone at all and don't notice v4 mode. Borla did a really nice job acoustically keeping drone outside of cabin. Cruising 60, 70, 80mph you barley notice exhaust. Radio on about 20% with a/c you can't even hear it. Passing gear sounds aggressive and I love it.  W.O.T. the sound is a beast. If planning on headers later I would prolly think of the touring or S-type. I gained about 25rwhp on dyno before tune on my 2018 Sierra 6.2. 

Thanks for the response. I don't know if I'll do headers in the future, so I may just stick with the ATAK system.

Posted

A cat back exhaust and cai will not void your warranty. I have Borla attak cat back and cai and have been to the dealership multiple times without any problems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
24 minutes ago, mikedeezxxx said:

A cat back exhaust and cai will not void your warranty. I have Borla attak cat back and cai and have been to the dealership multiple times without any problems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well that's great to hear! Thanks for the reply; maybe I'll look at doing this sooner than later.

Posted
20 hours ago, BeerPwningTexan said:

I have the borla atak with afe power cai. No drone at all and don't notice v4 mode. Borla did a really nice job acoustically keeping drone outside of cabin. Cruising 60, 70, 80mph you barley notice exhaust. Radio on about 20% with a/c you can't even hear it. Passing gear sounds aggressive and I love it.  W.O.T. the sound is a beast. If planning on headers later I would prolly think of the touring or S-type. I gained about 25rwhp on dyno before tune on my 2018 Sierra 6.2. 

I've got this exact setup and second everything he said. Only difference for me though is I have a tuner and disabled v4 mode. I only run in v8.

  • Like 1
Posted

I had a custom tune done as well by Pat G and took off V4.  Just installed ARH Headers with high flow cats and E85 sensor from dsx tuning this past weekend. Ordered a Vibrant resonator because my ATAK is too raspy for my taste and will update soon on sound.  

Posted
On 8/20/2019 at 6:40 PM, CrunchyBlack said:

I've looked at the K&N 71 series blackhawk induction cold air intake system or the Airaid MXP cold air intake system. Has anyone had any experience with these products?

I have the Blackhawk CAI in my truck and I love it.  I don't have any experience with it in conjunction with any aftermarket exhaust though, sorry.  I am planning on a Borla ATAK myself as soon as I feel like dumping $1K+ for one.

Posted (edited)

i did the stype cat back. split duals growly but not excessive. chrome(wanted black but no stock n250$more) did range afm delete. . love my sound with or without afm no drone. better with afm tho.. did air raid cai. love it .

Edited by no12nv
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 years later...
Posted

Ok so I have a cai and borla atak and now I'm throwing a p217e code.....anyone else have this problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...