Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

C7A         GVWR, 10,000 lbs. (4536 kg)

 

On Base Sierra - Available to all models with L8T Gas Engine. L5P Diesel requires TK20*53 or T*20*43 models. L5P Diesel Not Available with TC20743 or any Regular Cab models.
 On SLE - Available to all models with L8T Gas Engine. L5P Diesel requires TK20*53 or T*20*43 models. L5P Diesel Not Available with TC20743 or any Regular Cab models. When ordered with (ZW9) pickup bed delete, includes hard touch instrument panel-top pad.
On SLT - Available to all models with L8T Gas Engine. L5P Diesel requires TK20*53 or T*20*43 models. L5P Diesel Not Available with TC20743. When ordered with (ZW9) pickup bed delete, includes hard touch instrument panel-top pad.
On Denali - Not available with (YF5) or (NE1) emissions. 

On AT4 - Available, no restriction listed 

 

First letter T= gmc,  C = chev
K = 4wd

C = 2wd

20 = 2500 

53 = long or std box double cab

43 = long or short crew 

The * in the 5th spot would be 7 if standard box and 9 if long

 

The other GVWR's use 'ref only' rpo codes, assigned based on truck configuration. 

 

examples:. 

JGF    GVWR, 10,650 lbs. (4831 kg)
Any trim - Included and only available with CK20743 model and (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine with 18" or 20" wheels or CK20943 and (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine with 17" wheels.

 

C4M    GVWR, 9900 lbs. (4490 kg)
Base trim or LT (sierra and SLE in GMC) - Included and only available with CC20903 model and (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine with 17" wheels. 

Other trims not available

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted
6 hours ago, Kfroese said:

Thanks @MTU Alum is the 10000 code c7a? Can you do c7a with yf5?

I believe you need option code cgo vs c7a.  CGO goes with 20" tires where c7a is the other sizes.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted
11 hours ago, MTU Alum said:

I believe you need option code cgo vs c7a.  CGO goes with 20" tires where c7a is the other sizes.  

 

#iworkforGM 

Order guide says C7A is not available on Denali trim.

 

Is there a work around?

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, MTU Alum said:

Try CGO 

Can't find CGO.

 

Did a little more digging.

For 2019 model, C7A was freeflow, and 10,000lb, required L5P and crew cab on any sierra trim.

 

For 2020, C7A showed the restrictions in previous post.

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted
1 hour ago, redwngr said:

Can't find CGO.

 

Did a little more digging.

For 2019 model, C7A was freeflow, and 10,000lb, required L5P and crew cab on any sierra trim.

 

For 2020, C7A show the restrictions nin previous post.

 

 

So how are so many business owners in California driving new Denali 2500? I know their businesses are buying the trucks for the right offs

Posted

And none of the dealers in California have any clue what I’m talking about so it seems like this isn’t actually becoming an issue.

Posted

It's only going to become an issue if something happens. My business owns the truck and I have a DOT# but registered my truck as non-commercial in Minnesota. Still though, when i hookup to my 14k# flatbed trailer and go get a large part for work technically i would need those numbers.    No one will bother me though........ until something happens. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Dan Forsythe said:

It's only going to become an issue if something happens. My business owns the truck and I have a DOT# but registered my truck as non-commercial in Minnesota. Still though, when i hookup to my 14k# flatbed trailer and go get a large part for work technically i would need those numbers.    No one will bother me though........ until something happens. 

Did you actually put the numbers on your truck Or you just have the actual number in your records

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Kfroese said:

So how are so many business owners in California driving new Denali 2500? I know their businesses are buying the trucks for the right offs

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/pubs/reg_hdbk/appendix/appendix1f_fees

 

So I'm not 'knowledgeable' about Cali DMV rules, but, I had a quick look at their site, and the above page, at section .0190 Weight Fees for Commercial Vehicles With a Declared Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) of 10,000 Pounds or Less (Effective 01/01/2002) (CVC §9400)

 

Any chance you are mixing GVWR and GWR?

 

GVWR is the amount the vehicle and load can weight.

GVR is just the weight of the vehicle

 

(and GCWR is weight of truck+trailer+loads)

 

A quick look suggests to may that the fees just depend on what the GVR of the truck (ie what it actually weighs, before loads are added) rather than the GVWR which is what it is rated to weigh when loaded.

 

I'm assuming you don't pull a trailer, so the 26,000 pound commercial requirement isn't an issue. (or if you do, the trailer is small enough the the GCWR (rating for when truck and trailer are both at maximum load)

 

(Maybe I missed something in your explanation , or meed to spend more time at the DMV site)

Edited by redwngr
Posted

@kfroese I did not put them on my truck. too much bs associated with it. my business is a trucking company so i have the numbers and all that if ever forced to put them on

Posted
4 minutes ago, redwngr said:

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/pubs/reg_hdbk/appendix/appendix1f_fees

 

So I'm not 'knowledgeable' about Cali DMV rules, but, I had a quick look at their site, and the above page, at section .0190 Weight Fees for Commercial Vehicles With a Declared Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) of 10,000 Pounds or Less (Effective 01/01/2002) (CVC §9400)

 

Any chance you are mixing GVWR and GWR?

 

GVWR is the amount the vehicle and load can weight.

GVR is just the weight of the vehicle

 

(and GCWR is weight of truck+trailer+loads)

 

A quick look suggests to may that the fees just depend on what the GVR of the truck (ie what it actually weighs, before loads are added) rather than the GVWR which is what it is rated to weigh when loaded.

 

I'm assuming you don't pull a trailer, so the 26,000 pound commercial requirement isn't an issue. (or if you do, the trailer is small enough the the GCWR (rating for when truck and trailer are both at maximum load)

 

(Maybe I missed something in your explanation , or meed to spend more time at the DMV site)

I’m more concerned with the dot regulations, not the ca dmv stuff. Didn’t want to deal with dot and any extra requirements they have just because I want a more powerful truck. I’m just amazed the dealers don’t know what I’m talking about yet they tell me 90% of their business for these trucks is contractors. 

Posted
On 2/27/2020 at 11:26 AM, Dan Forsythe said:

It's only going to become an issue if something happens. My business owns the truck and I have a DOT# but registered my truck as non-commercial in Minnesota. Still though, when i hookup to my 14k# flatbed trailer and go get a large part for work technically i would need those numbers.    No one will bother me though........ until something happens. 

@Dan Forsythedid it automatically send you dot stuff when you bought the truck or did you have to file yourself? I’m wondering if most guys just let it go knowing that it won’t be an issue 

Posted

My dot# is over 30 years old, Nothing happens automatically. In MN where I’m at we have the option to register as commercial or non-commercial. I registered as non-commercial since 98% of the time I’m not using it for business purposes that would qualify for DOT. I use the diesel to plow and pull my boat, 5th wheel or car hauler.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...