Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

  Hey everyone. So I had the 1.5 inch leveling blocks installed underneath the struts on my TrailBoss. After 3 weeks and 1200 miles the ball joint boots were torn. My ride was the same and unaffected, but still. The angle of the ball joints were not good post-level. 

 This caused me to purchase new UCAs. I went with ready lift and got their plus 2 kit. Overall I’m happy now because the UCAs fix the ball joint angle. Now the ball joint sits straight, and allows for more lift. With the plus 2 kit I’m getting a total of 4inches in front, and 3 in the rear which gives me a half inch rake still. Not bad, half inch isn’t bad at all. See the attached pics and just be cautious when adding leveling blocks to the trailboss. 

FBACB822-1BA6-4C82-856D-CDB4F75E0506.jpeg

CD8BADA8-1928-41B1-9679-B5E4D6704250.jpeg

1861F0D1-ABD0-44D8-BF1B-CCE20CDF5787.jpeg

Edited by Marv’s Trailboss 19
Typos
  • Like 3
Posted

I'd assume this only affects trail boss suspension systems since they already have a lift from factory? Probably too much stress on the already lifted components. Motofab offers a more traditional 1.5" spacer lift for Trail Boss suspensions instead of blocks.

Posted
26 minutes ago, badwolf said:

I'd assume this only affects trail boss suspension systems since they already have a lift from factory? Probably too much stress on the already lifted components. Motofab offers a more traditional 1.5" spacer lift for Trail Boss suspensions instead of blocks.

can you explain the difference of spacers vs blocks? I think you answered the issue, with the problem.

 

Motofab only has one 1.5" kit for the trailboss and its the lower strut spacer.

Posted
13 minutes ago, tanner709 said:

can you explain the difference of spacers vs blocks? I think you answered the issue, with the problem.

 

Motofab only has one 1.5" kit for the trailboss and its the lower strut spacer.

I apologize, I meant Rough Country. They offer a spacer kit designed for the Trail Boss. The spacer lift fits on top of the front coil springs, whereas the block is bolted below the strut. Same result, but in a different way. Seeing as the trail boss already comes from factory with a lift, I would not recommend the block method. Ultimately the best way to achieve a leveled lift is with front height adjustable shocks, like Bilstein 5100s. But they are not available yet...

here is the link to the rough country 1.5" trail boss kit:
https://www.roughcountry.com/gmc-leveling-lift-kit-1319.html?find=2019-chevy-silverado-1500-4wd-381258

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, badwolf said:

I apologize, I meant Rough Country. They offer a spacer kit designed for the Trail Boss. The spacer lift fits on top of the front coil springs, whereas the block is bolted below the strut. Same result, but in a different way. Seeing as the trail boss already comes from factory with a lift, I would not recommend the block method. Ultimately the best way to achieve a leveled lift is with front height adjustable shocks, like Bilstein 5100s. But they are not available yet...

here is the link to the rough country 1.5" trail boss kit:
https://www.roughcountry.com/gmc-leveling-lift-kit-1319.html?find=2019-chevy-silverado-1500-4wd-381258

No matter which way you slice it if you move the wheel further from where the UCA is mounted you are going to increase angles.

Edited by Sjordan
  • Like 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, badwolf said:

I apologize, I meant Rough Country. They offer a spacer kit designed for the Trail Boss. The spacer lift fits on top of the front coil springs, whereas the block is bolted below the strut. Same result, but in a different way. Seeing as the trail boss already comes from factory with a lift, I would not recommend the block method. Ultimately the best way to achieve a leveled lift is with front height adjustable shocks, like Bilstein 5100s. But they are not available yet...

here is the link to the rough country 1.5" trail boss kit:
https://www.roughcountry.com/gmc-leveling-lift-kit-1319.html?find=2019-chevy-silverado-1500-4wd-381258

Yeah but either way you alter the UCA and balljoint angle. There is no gain in top hat vs lower spacer, with regards to this issue.

5 minutes ago, Sjordan said:

No matter which way you slice it if you move the wheel further from where the UCA arm is mounted you are going to increase angles.

100%.

Posted

Either way, it wouldn't hurt to get new upper control arms because this way you ensure that your angles aren't maxed out whether at full droop or compression. It's piece of mind for me. Just be cautious with any leveling kit that doesn't include UCAs. Check the ball joint from time to time. 

Posted

Well... then it seems any additional lift to the trail boss seems to be outside of its acceptable range for it's stock components.

 

Definitely an issue to consider if thinking about lifting/leveling a trail boss...

Posted
1 hour ago, badwolf said:

I apologize, I meant Rough Country. They offer a spacer kit designed for the Trail Boss. The spacer lift fits on top of the front coil springs, whereas the block is bolted below the strut. Same result, but in a different way. Seeing as the trail boss already comes from factory with a lift, I would not recommend the block method. Ultimately the best way to achieve a leveled lift is with front height adjustable shocks, like Bilstein 5100s. But they are not available yet...

here is the link to the rough country 1.5" trail boss kit:
https://www.roughcountry.com/gmc-leveling-lift-kit-1319.html?find=2019-chevy-silverado-1500-4wd-381258

Any idea when the 5100s will be available? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, tannerm24 said:

Any idea when the 5100s will be available? 

No idea, but I am patiently waiting. 

Posted

I have read about others with the same issue. If you watch the Readylift vid on YouTube the guy mentions the exact same occurrence. Too much angle must pinch the boot.


Sent via Morse code

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...