Jump to content

99 Chevy Tahoe 5.7l. No start.


Recommended Posts

Posted

who can help me with a no start problem on my 99 Chevy Tahoe 5.7l 4 wheel drive? or where to go for help.

 

On my 99 Chevy Tahoe 5.7l vortex.. No codes, no security light. Truck just died like it ran out of gas. Now I have a no 

Start issue for a month. On the ICM mounted beside the coil with a 4 pin connector, it has a

Pink wire tests 12volts, and a white wire tests 1 to 4 volts also the LED light flashes, and a 

Black with white stripe wire which is the ground it tests good, the fourth wire is white with a black stripe which 

Is the switching signal and I can not get a signal out of  the circuit. 

I have had the ICM tested and they say its good. I have ohm it myself and all prongs read the same any way I put my leads

But the switching signal doesnt . it reads

With red on ground and black on the switching signal it reads 2.671 mega ohms

With black on ground and red on switching signal it reads absolutely nothing.

Why is the switching signal not reading?

Does that mean my ICM is bad? Please help.. Thank you

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Yeah, that would be helpful.

 

Like when you turn the key to start it does it just click? Does the starter engage and rotate the engine?

Posted

yes my Tahoe cranks but does not start. it going on 3 weeks now. i got in the Tahoe and started it. i let it idle to warm up and i backed out tge driveway and when i put it in drive pushed on gas peddle and it died. hasnt started since. no warning no nothing. here is a list of everything i have done and replaced and tested.... give me a few min.. BTW... thanks 

Posted

Here is a list of all the things I have done and tested:

Bought new crank sensor. Tested 12 v good ground. Checked signal to PCM. All is okay.
To make sure I'm not tripping, I pierced all three wires at PCM, all had same reading and are good.
Then replaced ICM 4 wire, all checked out good with voltage. 
Checked signal and ground at com all checked good.
Checked coil have power to it, the signal wire white and black is giving signal. But no fire out of coil. Absolutely none. 
On the ICM, we do have trigger signal from PCM, and do no have signal coming from the ICM.
Changed cam sensor, okay checked good. 
Changed Distributor cap, and rotor button they check good.
Changed all plug wires, pulled all plugs checked them. And they check good.
Changed ignition cylinder, and column. 
Just for shits and giggles I took distributor out and put #1 TDC. 
On the coil the link wire is positive, white tachometer, and black and white ignition signal, I took another plug and put on the coil link wire on connector which is 12v without anything connected to. With key on 12v going on and 12v coming out of white wire wire and white and black wire. 
I had a code of 1351, said ground #1 cylinder. How can the ICM send the ignition signal to the coil when the coil is putting out 12v? 
Signal goes to icm from pcm but nothing comes out of icm

T
Posted

I have a 99tahoe with 5.7 vortec
Truck just shut down leaving driveway. I have change crankshaft sensor, can sensor, icm plug wires. I get no signal to the coil from icm. I have ohm wires from pcm I've check voltage to all sensors there good. I've check all the signals from ckp, to camsenor, to icm to knock sensor. I've owned wires from senors to pcm. I've check for my ground. I can't get the icm to send signal to coil. I get the signal from pcm to the icm but that's as far it will go. Don't tell me the icm is bad cause I've have tried 5 different icm, bought new one and the last 3 of the I had tested at store before I left. What the heck. By the way I've got good fuel pressure check all the fuses. All the sensors that are responsible in starting the truck check out right. From ground to signal. I can't get the icm signal to coil
No security light is on, no codes. One thing I'd like to know on my coil I have a plug in that had 3 termials one is pink wire which is my 12 volts, the other one in middle is the white wire for the tech, the 3rd circuit is the Whittemore and black stripe wire that the icm sends its signal to coil to make it fire. OK on all three circuit I have 120 volts coming in on pink wire I have 12 volts coming out on the tech wire, a different 12 volts coming out of the white/black strip down it which is my signal wire from icm. How can you push 12 volts to a 5 volt circuit. When I turn key on the coil would be sending 12 volts to the icm 5 volt circuit on signal wire. How is that. Is there someone out there that think so they can tell me a Indian trick of why it won't produce a signal to coil to fire. I've asked and asked who can be smarter than anyone else out of 1000 so of people 
Please show me and make me feel stupid. I've check voltage ohm wires. I've been. Working on this for 3 weeks still haven't got anywhere 
I know someone has had the same problem out there as I do. Help me

Posted

The obvious way you "push 12v" is to check the voltage on the circuit by pulling the connector off and checking the voltage on the now open circuit.  If you take any circuit, pull the ground connection off the circuit then test the voltage on that very same ground wire, you will get a 12v signal.  Doesn't matter how far away that connection is from the ground location.

 

You need to stop the "just because" diagnostic logic.  Go back to the beginning, calm down, and slow down on the testing.  Don't skip any tests, and never make more than one change at a time.   You very likely have passed by the problem already.  Don't be afraid to retest something from the other side.  I don't know if manufacturers still have troubleshooting sections in their factory service manuals anymore, but, Chrysler did back in the 70s-80s, saved my ass a couple of times.  

 

One more thing, if you test like you write, you are not careful in what you are doing.  You are very likely right in that someone has come across this before, but it was likely only once, and long forgotten. 

Posted

Check out Paul Danner on Youtube and on his website. The Youtube channel name is ScannerDanner, and his channel is Scannerdanner.com - his Premium Channel is well worth the $11 a month. I can just about guarantee you'll find the problem yourself after watching the Premium Channel.

 

Sounds like you have an input problem, wiring problem, or output problem with the PCM. Powers and GROUNDS need to be checked at the PCM. Ohm checks on wiring are no good - you need to disconnect the wiring you wish to test at BOTH ends, and power a halogen bulb, or old school sealed beam headlamp through the wiring - if the wiring can handle that (especially with both high and low on at the same time), and lights the light good and bright, you know 100% that the wiring is good. From there, you can check everything else. A bad-out-of-the-box crank sensor is also a very likely possibly. 

 

I didn't read the whole thread, so forgive me if I'm repeating something ... but don't buy parts at any chain parts stores except for NAPA  . I've found their stuff to be quite a bit more reliable than Auto Zone, Checker/Schucks/Kragan auto parts (or whatever they are called these days), Pep Boys, O'Reilly's, etc.. If you can't find a NAPA, buy Denso, NGK,  Bosch, or OE parts off Rock Auto, or wherever you can find them (preferably not at any dealership).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...