Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
 
I definitely will, I already have paid for it, won’t ship till December or January unfortunately. Where are you seeing exhaust for the 2.7 I can’t find it on AFE website. I would really be interested in a catless downpipe and also a bigger FMIC
 
If someone cracks the ECU for tuning we could run e85 and make some real power. Exhaust, intake and FMIC on e85 would easily make more power than a 6.2
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
 
 


In your dreams! You’re assuming you can squeeze out at the least 110 hp more out of a 4 cylinder, lmao. You want a high performance motor, you start with a 420 hp 6.2 and go from there. I’ve personally easily beaten every truck that’s ever tried to race me and being lifted I’ve only got a SuperChips tuned 6.2 set on performance adding between 25-30 hp and that’s it, no exhaust or air intake, don’t embarrass yourself trying to take on a 6.2. You buy an economical motor for the sake of saving money, don’t throw your money away attempting to make it more than what it is, an economical means of transportation for hauling and light towing.


Sent from Above
Posted (edited)

I believe this thread is a darn good example of why we have different options with the engine's and trim levels.  Its your money,  spend it on what you want/need or can afford and be happy for those who pick something different instead of complaining about their decision

Edited by wizard4878
  • Like 1
Posted
I believe this thread is a darn good example of why we have different options with the engine's and trim levels.  Its your money,  spend it on what you want/need or can afford and be happy for those who pick something different instead of complaining about their decision


The 2.7 is a great little motor and it’s a “darn” good reason to stick with discussing the 2.7 options and stay within the parameters of reality and not fascinate on 6.2’s. Seems like every other discussion is about comparing or competing with the 6.2. Best to stick to reality and not throw ones money away but PLEASE don’t add a rice burner sounding exhaust on it, you’ll regret it down the road lol


Sent from Above
Posted


In your dreams! You’re assuming you can squeeze out at the least 110 hp more out of a 4 cylinder, lmao. You want a high performance motor, you start with a 420 hp 6.2 and go from there. I’ve personally easily beaten every truck that’s ever tried to race me and being lifted I’ve only got a SuperChips tuned 6.2 set on performance adding between 25-30 hp and that’s it, no exhaust or air intake, don’t embarrass yourself trying to take on a 6.2. You buy an economical motor for the sake of saving money, don’t throw your money away attempting to make it more than what it is, an economical means of transportation for hauling and light towing.

Sent from Above


First off, this is a truck, not a race car. Anyone “racing” a 5000lb truck is an idiot. You should educate yourself on boost, e85 etc. Plenty of 4 cylinders out there that mop the floor with V8s. I’m a V8 guy at heart, I have had a turbo Cobra, supercharged 5.0 coyote etc I’m not new to the game. We will just have to wait and see how this engine responds to mods. My 2018 WRX, which was a 2.0 made over 400 AWHP with full bolt ons. Stock it was rated at 264hp. So making an additional 100+ hp out of a factory boosted engine is not hard.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

 

The 2.7 is a great little motor and it’s a “darn” good reason to stick with discussing the 2.7 options and stay within the parameters of reality and not fascinate on 6.2’s. Seems like every other discussion is about comparing or competing with the 6.2. Best to stick to reality and not throw ones money away but PLEASE don’t add a rice burner sounding exhaust on it, you’ll regret it down the road lol

 

 

Sent from Above

 

No one is “fascinating” on the 6.2. It was merely an example or comparison that a modern boosted 4 cylinder can make V8 power. Now boost the V8 and it’s a different story obviously

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted


First off, this is a truck, not a race car. Anyone “racing” a 5000lb truck is an idiot. You should educate yourself on boost, e85 etc. Plenty of 4 cylinders out there that mop the floor with V8s. I’m a V8 guy at heart, I have had a turbo Cobra, supercharged 5.0 coyote etc I’m not new to the game. We will just have to wait and see how this engine responds to mods. My 2018 WRX, which was a 2.0 made over 400 AWHP with full bolt ons. Stock it was rated at 264hp. So making an additional 100+ hp out of a factory boosted engine is not hard.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Ummm, I thought we were talking about trucks? But, my slant nose would have spanked your little Subaru and sent you home with your tail between your legs but those days are long gone. The point I’ve made is “stick to reality” by the time someone is done investing so much into their addiction of even coming close to a 6.2 you could’ve spent the extra money on actually buying a 6.2. Besides, high chance you’ll break something along the way not to mention throw your warranty out the window


Sent from Above
Posted

I’ve been saying throughout this thread that he made a good financial choice but let’s not encourage him to take out a loan and break something along with voiding his warranty during the process.


Sent from Above

Posted

Personally, I believe he should first start leaving it stock and run a simple SuperChips tune on it, go from there where it’s very easy to adjust what needs adjusting and undo what’s been done, that’s “if” it’s even available


Sent from Above

  • Like 1
Posted


Ummm, I thought we were talking about trucks? But, my slant nose would have spanked your little Subaru and sent you home with your tail between your legs but those days are long gone. The point I’ve made is “stick to reality” by the time someone is done investing so much into their addiction of even coming close to a 6.2 you could’ve spent the extra money on actually buying a 6.2. Besides, high chance you’ll break something along the way not to mention throw your warranty out the window


Sent from Above


Lmao
We can play that game, my 750rwhp coyote would have spanked your “little slant nose” two times over. And yes those days are gone for me too unfortunately. Anyway, yes I see your point the 6.2 is clearly the better platform if it’s power your after. However I’m a gear head and I mess with everything I buy lol my only plans are to add the AFE Intake and maybe, and that’s a big maybe a down pipe, no catback or an annoying exhaust. But I won’t be doing any other mods this truck is my daily driver.

Back on track, besides superchips are there any other companies that mess with tuning. I would imagine HP Tuners would have something for the T1 in the works




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted


Lmao
We can play that game, my 750rwhp coyote would have spanked your “little slant nose” two times over. And yes those days are gone for me too unfortunately. Anyway, yes I see your point the 6.2 is clearly the better platform if it’s power your after. However I’m a gear head and I mess with everything I buy lol my only plans are to add the AFE Intake and maybe, and that’s a big maybe a down pipe, no catback or an annoying exhaust. But I won’t be doing any other mods this truck is my daily driver.

Back on track, besides superchips are there any other companies that mess with tuning. I would imagine HP Tuners would have something for the T1 in the works




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Good question and based of what’s been going on around the forum, don’t think so


Sent from Above
Posted
37 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 


The 2.7 is a great little motor and it’s a “darn” good reason to stick with discussing the 2.7 options and stay within the parameters of reality and not fascinate on 6.2’s. Seems like every other discussion is about comparing or competing with the 6.2. Best to stick to reality and not throw ones money away but PLEASE don’t add a rice burner sounding exhaust on it, you’ll regret it down the road lol


Sent from Above

 

I have the 5.3 and wont change the exhaust because of it sounding like something other than a V8,  but to each their own,  if someone likes that sound I say go for it

  • Like 1
Posted

I wouldn’t count the little 2.7 out as far as performance goes. Hopefully it performs as well as the Ford 2.7. That motor in a F 150 crew cab 2wd ran the 1/4 in 14.2.  That motor in a crew cab 4wd Ranger with just a tune ran 8.8 in the 1/8th, which would be roughly a mid-high 13 1/4 mile, smoking any stock GM 6.2.  

Posted
I wouldn’t count the little 2.7 out as far as performance goes. Hopefully it performs as well as the Ford 2.7. That motor in a F 150 crew cab 2wd ran the 1/4 in 14.2.  That motor in a crew cab 4wd Ranger with just a tune ran 8.8 in the 1/8th, which would be roughly a mid-high 13 1/4 mile, smoking any stock GM 6.2.  


Good lord! Enough with the fascination with the 6.2’s lol


Sent from Above
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...