Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
 
Not saying you did. Was just saying there's a post similar to this in the Facebook groups once a week at least and there's a group of guys that like to bash me because I say it's a stupid idea.
 
That being said you took off a lot less then most people I've seen. Most of the ones I've seen they grind the whole bump flat. I think you'll be ok it doesn't look like they took to much off. Just paint them so they don't rust. Maybe even ceramic coat them while you're at it...
 
Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
 
 Yup definitely getting them painted next week!! The guy who did it said if he had to take anymore off he wouldn’t and I would have to do the rest cause he wasn’t going any lower
 




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

I know this is an older thread, but also a common issue. 

Just received my new Fuel Anza wheels 17x8.5 , with P295/70/17 tires all mounted up ready to go. 

 

Unfortunately that brake caliper casting bulge strikes a again. 

4 websites all said these wheels would fit my 2019+ GMC or Silverado 1500. 

 

I have a very similar problem, looks like I will need to shave my calipers down about the same amount as you did to clearance my new rims. 

Just curious if you have seen any problems arise from it. Honestly I don't think it's all that big a deal.

But there is plenty of people out there somewhat freaked out about it. 

 

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 3.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 4.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 5.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 1.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 2.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 6.jpg

Edited by cc1999
Posted

Got them clearanced , no problem. Took about 30 min for each front caliber. Took about half that bulge off. 
Rides and drives great. 
I am a happy camper now.
 

859950FD-3863-4F7A-A083-2198BE4A40A5.jpeg

B6E1495E-823B-4029-8970-538716F92534.jpeg

C7CDC655-A4EC-4820-B386-A4D26757D503.jpeg

E6D92112-ED38-4318-9D4A-6C0B7A39F25B.jpeg

AEB46906-1A1C-4E25-8524-6E421C2D6148.jpeg

969EBD68-41A9-40EA-A5E0-0EE1EE28E154.jpeg

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 9:32 PM, cc1999 said:

Got them clearanced , no problem. Took about 30 min for each front caliber. Took about half that bulge off. 
Rides and drives great. 
I am a happy camper now.
 

859950FD-3863-4F7A-A083-2198BE4A40A5.jpeg

B6E1495E-823B-4029-8970-538716F92534.jpeg

C7CDC655-A4EC-4820-B386-A4D26757D503.jpeg

E6D92112-ED38-4318-9D4A-6C0B7A39F25B.jpeg

AEB46906-1A1C-4E25-8524-6E421C2D6148.jpeg

969EBD68-41A9-40EA-A5E0-0EE1EE28E154.jpeg

Any problems? Also have we concluded whether or not it's a fluid channel or some stupid design?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

So obviously, I'm having the same predicament with my wheels and calipers. I decided to order a used caliper from ebay and I'm going to drill and sand down the hump to see how much metal is there. I've ran a 3/8's hub centric spacer and I'm currently on a 1.25" hub centric spacer. Still, the bigger spacers cause some rubbing and the smaller spacer takes up too much of the wheels stud to where there isn't much threads left. Obviously I'm not happy with the outcome of either spacer but in short I'll post pictures as soon as I get this caliper.

Posted
On 10/22/2019 at 2:20 PM, LTeddy said:

 

So I went this morning to get my rims and tires put on from my previous truck to my new custom trail boss.. fuel maverick 18x9 +14 offset and they did not work spokes were bumping into the little hump on the caliper.. put a 1/4 spacer on no dice.. he ended up grinding that hump pretty far down.. my question is has anyone done this or heard of doing this? Any issues anyone sees of doing this? It’s already done just hoping I didn’t make a bad call 0b2ac034c5a1080ee05201e772748cd2.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

So I ordered a caliper off of ebay to further research this whole hump issue we all have with the new calipers. I actually took them apart and there is nothing behind the piston! So I decided to grind the hump and I actually grinded it all the way flat! I'm still going to drill the caliper through the small passage from inside the piston cup to see how thick the sidewall still is.20230412_094003.thumb.jpg.870884d2c54642b4ee8a4714ce55cd44.jpg20230412_093956.thumb.jpg.713ef439e9515426f0a313958bc3de6d.jpg

Screenshot_20230412_100017_Gallery.jpg

Screenshot_20230412_100042_Gallery.jpg

Posted

The rib across the back of the pistons is to reduce flex or deformation of the caliper. It was engineered there for a reason - taking any of it off is risk vs. reward calculation. 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

The rib across the back of the pistons is to reduce flex or deformation of the caliper. It was engineered there for a reason - taking any of it off is risk vs. reward calculation. 

Maybe, but if that's the case, wouldn't the inside half of the caliper have the same reinforcements? The rear half actually has less metal in the design, you could actually see the outline of the piston cups. I still plan on cutting the front half down the middle to see how thick the metal actually is on the oil passage part of the caliper. I'm no engineer and I don't have access to those documents, so I won't and can't tell you what GM engineers were thinking or why they designed something a certain way. What I will say is that these calipers look pretty similar to older Brembo caliper designs, but I'm also not saying that they are just that. Either way, what I'm trying to do is provide other people here with some actual measurements and answers to the wonders of these calipers. Being that automotive hydraulic brakes only apply around 400 lbs psi during light to medium use, if there is enough metal there, then there should be no worries about having brake fluid burst the side of the caliper. As far as it flexing under pressure, I can't say much about that either. Unless, I fully grind down and install the caliper, apply brake pressure and take measurements of it to see if there was any flex. Now if you are a GM engineer or have access to such documents, then my apologies and please share the info, it would definitely save me the headache and save everyone else on here the time on trying to find the actual answer to this mystery.

20230412_202432.jpg

20230412_202427.jpg

Posted
7 hours ago, jweezy said:

Maybe, but if that's the case, wouldn't the inside half of the caliper have the same reinforcements?

Not necessarily, the inside of the caliper is loaded differently from the outside. The inside face between the pistons is in tension, which is controlled by the additional metal surrounding the pistons, the outside, where the rib is, is in compression. 

 

7 hours ago, jweezy said:

The rear half actually has less metal in the design

Likely the reason for the rib.

 

7 hours ago, jweezy said:

Either way, what I'm trying to do is provide other people here with some actual measurements and answers to the wonders of these calipers. Being that automotive hydraulic brakes only apply around 400 lbs psi during light to medium use, if there is enough metal there, then there should be no worries about having brake fluid burst the side of the caliper. As far as it flexing under pressure, I can't say much about that either. Unless, I fully grind down and install the caliper, apply brake pressure and take measurements of it to see if there was any flex. Now if you are a GM engineer or have access to such documents, then my apologies and please share the info, it would definitely save me the headache and save everyone else on here the time on trying to find the actual answer to this mystery.

I doubt fluid will burst out of the caliper... Back in the early 2000's GM had Bosch (If memory serves...) assist with the re-design of the brakes on full size trucks. One of the findings was excessive flex of the caliper. The result at that time was poor pedal feel. How much flex was there... don't know.

 

In this case I doubt it would even be measurable. Some material analysis in a computer simulation likely showed it. 

 

In practice, trying to reverse engineer a brake caliper with grinders, tape measure, or any tools any of us have access to won't reveal much. You could grind it off completely and likely never even notice; but there is that one scenario out of ??? that it would be a problem. 

 

Not sure what actual answer to the mystery you would expect to find that you haven't already - grind it off completely. Bolt it on and see what happens is all that's left. Unless we want to wait for the engineer to post his analysis and design of the caliper. :D

 

Not being a jerk or anything, just having a discussion about it.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

It's one of those things where you only find out if you went too far, in a circumstance where you really really wish you hadn't done the mod.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

Not necessarily, the inside of the caliper is loaded differently from the outside. The inside face between the pistons is in tension, which is controlled by the additional metal surrounding the pistons, the outside, where the rib is, is in compression. 

 

Likely the reason for the rib.

 

I doubt fluid will burst out of the caliper... Back in the early 2000's GM had Bosch (If memory serves...) assist with the re-design of the brakes on full size trucks. One of the findings was excessive flex of the caliper. The result at that time was poor pedal feel. How much flex was there... don't know.

 

In this case I doubt it would even be measurable. Some material analysis in a computer simulation likely showed it. 

 

In practice, trying to reverse engineer a brake caliper with grinders, tape measure, or any tools any of us have access to won't reveal much. You could grind it off completely and likely never even notice; but there is that one scenario out of ??? that it would be a problem. 

 

Not sure what actual answer to the mystery you would expect to find that you haven't already - grind it off completely. Bolt it on and see what happens is all that's left. Unless we want to wait for the engineer to post his analysis and design of the caliper. :D

 

Not being a jerk or anything, just having a discussion about it.

 

No I completely appreciate this type of back and forth, it makes multiple minds work together. And by the back half, I meant the half without the rib. And yes, you are right, there's always that one time

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Following this post closely. Im very interested in what JWEEZY finds out about the caliper once he cuts it in half. I have a 2019 High Country that I put aftermarket rims on and have to use .5 spacers, and it drives me nuts to see the different offset on the front and rear tires.

Posted
11 hours ago, richard.bowen1 said:

Following this post closely. Im very interested in what JWEEZY finds out about the caliper once he cuts it in half. I have a 2019 High Country that I put aftermarket rims on and have to use .5 spacers, and it drives me nuts to see the different offset on the front and rear tires.

Sorry man, but you'll have to wait a few more months for this. I ended up having to deployed so I wasn't able to get that done. But I am definitely looking forward to cutting that caliper too. If anything, I would still feel safe grinding down half of that bump. But that still doesn't solve the issue of needing a spacer.

I was running a set of 3/8 inch spacers in the front at first with 2 inch spacers in the rear. That took care of the offset pretty good.

Posted

Would GM add more metal to the caliper, which is more expense and casting complexity for no reason? No, they would not. That caliper rib is there for a reason. 

Removing it makes as much sense as notching your rims for clearance. Use a spacer. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...