Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I like the look of the stock rims, my LT TB came with the 20" upgraded wheels...  But I wouldn't mind moving them out a bit with a set of hub centric wheel spacers.  Seems that the local 4WheelParts store has severa, types in stock... Just wondering what a good size is...  I want to put the wheels out a bit, give it a bit wider stance...  Don't want to cause issues with handling or excessive wear on bearings and things and I don't want to have to cut the stock lugs or whatever...  Hoping that there is some magic size that you just bolt them on and go?

Posted
29 minutes ago, SquireSCA said:

I like the look of the stock rims, my LT TB came with the 20" upgraded wheels...  But I wouldn't mind moving them out a bit with a set of hub centric wheel spacers.  Seems that the local 4WheelParts store has severa, types in stock... Just wondering what a good size is...  I want to put the wheels out a bit, give it a bit wider stance...  Don't want to cause issues with handling or excessive wear on bearings and things and I don't want to have to cut the stock lugs or whatever...  Hoping that there is some magic size that you just bolt them on and go?

I just got some BORA spacers on today.... They're the most popular brand on the forums for our silverados.  Made n USA, top quality.

If you just want hub centric spacers, you can get their 3/8" spacers, which will use the stock lugs and bolts.  Otherwise, you have to go up to a 1.5" spacer, or you'll have to grind off the extra stock lug bolts sticking out.  The Trail Boss wheels have pockets on the back side of the wheels that are able to fit 1.25" wide spacers, and require no trimming of the stock bolts... which is the size I got.  Not sure if this size will work on other stock wheels or not... have to see if there's room on the back side of the wheel for the stock lugs protruding out to fit in.

 

So to answer your question, with BORA spacers you can more or less go with .25" or .375" spacers with stock lugs or jump up to 1.5" (maybe 1.25" depending on wheel), without having to trim the lug bolts.

 

Here are some pics:

 

20200103_125007.thumb.jpg.21571c6a19cc3633a2cf0eaae9a27ffb.jpg

 

20200103_132938.thumb.jpg.ae858547f425f59325a358c044b60238.jpg20200103_132944.thumb.jpg.bcd28aa571cf40972ef9c0edf7cdd13b.jpg

 

20200103_171435.thumb.jpg.0d7bed5abbd802fb4fae21b163ea6f96.jpg20200103_171500.thumb.jpg.a370a9fe9f32961cdc2e42a912c6c37a.jpg

 

20200103_172353.thumb.jpg.ac2273c11ae36bac8e055c1fa04f60b5.jpg

Posted
1 minute ago, lapoolboy said:

What size tires?  Do they clear up front throughout the turning radius?

Me?  I have stock TB tires/wheels 275/65-18.  No rubbing anywhere.  I have a 2" level kit though too.

Posted
1 minute ago, Swiftks said:

Me?  I have stock TB tires/wheels 275/65-18.  No rubbing anywhere.  I have a 2" level kit though too.

Cool.  I have LTZ with 4" so I should be good too.  How much stud sticks out past spacer?

Posted
Just now, lapoolboy said:

Cool.  I have LTZ with 4" so I should be good too.  How much stud sticks out past spacer?

Didn't measure, guess I should have... If you look at the pic, doesn't look like more than 1/2".  They fit in pocket on back of TB wheels no problem though.

Posted

My tires are the stock size, I upgraded to better tires, but kept the stock size of 275/60r20

So 1.5 will give me a noticeable change in stance, allow me to use my stock lug nuts, etc...

The ones that I linked to...  will they work?  Decent brand?

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

Thanks bud

After thinking about it for a minute... They can't be much more than .25" outside the spacers, because 1.5" spacers will fit ALL the stock Chevy wheels without any cutting, and the ones I got are 1.25" spacers, so math suggest they aren't sticking out much more than a 1/4 inch.

Edited by Swiftks
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, SquireSCA said:

My tires are the stock size, I upgraded to better tires, but kept the stock size of 275/60r20

So 1.5 will give me a noticeable change in stance, allow me to use my stock lug nuts, etc...

The ones that I linked to...  will they work?  Decent brand?

1.5" will bring the tires out for sure.  Not sure what you mean about using the stock lugs.... If you go over 3/8" wide spacer, you'll be bolting the spacer to the stock lug bolts, and then the wheels to the spacers with the stock lug nuts, as pictured above.

 

Can't speak to other brands, sorry.  I went with what others have reported as being a reputable brand, and have worked for others (BORA).  They're not cheap, mine were $255 w/shipping.... But I kind figure it's one of those things you don't want to go bargain hunting for, and you get what you pay for.  Just Google the brand you're looking at and look for reviews.

Edited by Swiftks
Posted

I will go talk to the guys at 4WP tomorrow and see what they think.  I might need them to install them, can't imagine it would take long, but I don;t have a floor jack that will lift my truck to allow me to do it at home...

Well, I guess the jack that came with the truck, for tire changes would have to work, right?  haha

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, SquireSCA said:

I will go talk to the guys at 4WP tomorrow and see what they think.  I might need them to install them, can't imagine it would take long, but I don;t have a floor jack that will lift my truck to allow me to do it at home...

Well, I guess the jack that came with the truck, for tire changes would have to work, right?  haha

Yeah, I went down to local mechanic shop near my house, took 20 minutes, charged me $20.  Could have done it myself, but wasn't worth the time and effort for $20.

 

I'd also suggest putting some loctite on the stock lug bolts and will now hold the spacers, so they won't get loose.  Supposed to take the wheels off after a couple hundred miles and check that they're still torqued to spec too.  Torque both spacer lugs and wheel lugs to factory 140 ft. lbs.

Edited by Swiftks
  • Like 1
Posted

@Swiftks do you have any more photos of your truck with the spacers installed. Something zoomed a little further back that shows the overall stance?  This is the exact set up I was thinking about doing. Thanks a ton in advance. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...