Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just saw this on Instagram.  BDS announced a new 2,5” coilover lift for the Trailboss.  I was pretty excited until I saw the price.[emoji85]
 
http://bds-suspension.com/product?kid=754F
 
tboughts?  Seems to me it’s same price if you bought the 4” lift and bought coil overs separately. This doesn’t makes sense to me, way overpriced.

Expensive, yes! But to be fair, coilovers by themselves will run you $2k so that alone is more than half the cost. And typically the components between different heights (2” vs 4” vs 6” etc) are fairly similar just slightly different lengths on some components. So it makes sense that cost is similar to other kits they offer.

BDS also makes great kits with an awesome warranty! I know that doesn’t help swallow the cost of the kit haha but at least you know you’re getting quality components. But yeah cost isn’t proportional to lift height
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Here is another quality option, better shocks, covers the front - then you have to add a rear set up like BDS - price shown is with 2.5" adjustable kings 

 

Baja Link:  https://www.bajakits.com/i-31570226-19-silverado-sierra-1500-4wd-upper-arm.html?ref=category:1459192

 

 
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 1
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 2
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 3
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 4
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 5
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 6
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 7
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 19+ Silverado/Sierra 1500 4WD Upper Arm - Image 9
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

19+ SILVERADO/SIERRA 1500 4WD UPPER ARM

SKU:C10U19
Shocks Sold Separately
Shipping: Please contact us directly for International, Hawaii and Alaska shipping
FREE SHIPPING!
Pricing: $2726.80

OPTIONS AVAILABLE

Select Shock Option
OEM King 2.5 Coilovers+$1,519.05
OEM King 2.5 With Compression Adjusters+$1,827.80
OEM King 3.0 Coilovers+$3,324.05
Edited by Supercup
Posted
On 1/21/2020 at 8:44 PM, Trailboss75 said:

Just saw this on Instagram.  BDS announced a new 2,5” coilover lift for the Trailboss.  I was pretty excited until I saw the price.?

 

http://bds-suspension.com/product?kid=754F

 

tboughts?  Seems to me it’s same price if you bought the 4” lift and bought coil overs separately. This doesn’t makes sense to me, way overpriced.

The 4” lift and the coil over lift have the same components, except the non coil over lift comes with 4” spacers for the top of the stock struts. So the pricing is 100% in line. I had this kit installed a week ago with the dual speed compression adjusters and couldn’t be happier. I ran 2.5” kings on my 4Runner and they leaked all the time. I rebuilt them 4 times and when I got rid of it, one was leaking again. 
 

also, kings should really only be lifted 2.5” , which puts you .5” over stock height on a trail boss / at4. Once you add rears to that king kit, you’re at about 4k as well. Mind you, those rear shocks from king are much nicer than the standard fox shocks on the rear of the bds kit. If/when fox releases some better rear shocks, I’ll most likely upgrade mine.

Posted
5 hours ago, anferknee said:

The 4” lift and the coil over lift have the same components, except the non coil over lift comes with 4” spacers for the top of the stock struts. So the pricing is 100% in line. I had this kit installed a week ago with the dual speed compression adjusters and couldn’t be happier. I ran 2.5” kings on my 4Runner and they leaked all the time. I rebuilt them 4 times and when I got rid of it, one was leaking again. 
 

also, kings should really only be lifted 2.5” , which puts you .5” over stock height on a trail boss / at4. Once you add rears to that king kit, you’re at about 4k as well. Mind you, those rear shocks from king are much nicer than the standard fox shocks on the rear of the bds kit. If/when fox releases some better rear shocks, I’ll most likely upgrade mine.

is your truck and AT4 or Trail Boss-  if so how does the ride compare?  AT4 street ride is really good - want better shocks, but not at the expense of the ride quality 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Supercup said:

is your truck and AT4 or Trail Boss-  if so how does the ride compare?  AT4 street ride is really good - want better shocks, but not at the expense of the ride quality 

At4. I hated the stock ride. Way too mushy. I’d hit a speed bump or back out of a drive way and bounce all over the place. The new coilovers just soak it all up. Obviously going from a p-metric 31.5” street tire to a 35” f rated lt tire, you feel more bumps in the road, but the trade off is worth it to me. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, justin saleeby said:

ive got the icon coilover 2.5 and they are worth every penny, You wont regret losing the ranchos

I did the icons too, mines set at 3 inch but I used rc forged control arms since I didnt think I needed 900.00 control arms to drive to work..lol.. It handles really good but is firm.  I'm afraid to turn it to 3.5, with adding preload would it get too harsh I'm not sure. To me this is prob the best bang for the buck.  I do have kings on my 2500hd for years and they are flawless..

Posted
On 1/26/2020 at 10:45 AM, justin saleeby said:

ive got the icon coilover 2.5 and they are worth every penny, You wont regret losing the ranchos

Did you go with the Stage 1 or Stage 2. And if Stage 2, did you go with tubular or billet aluminum upper control arms. Debating on going with Icon, but not sure if I need the upper control arms or not...I have a Trail Boss.

Thanks

  • Like 1
Posted

Do you NEED them, no. Do you WANT them. yes :)

 

Their control arms typically offer more travel when combined with their coilovers and also provide better angles after being lifted. However, some lifts are designed around the factory UCA so they aren't required.

 

I've had their billet UCA's on two different trucks now. Did I notice a difference? No, not really. I had good alignments with the factory arms but damn do the billet UCA's look good! The billet arms also offer a LOT more adjustability and fine tuning.

 

I should add that my experience only comes from using the truck as a daily driver and not off road where I imagine UCA's play more of a role. 

 

Would I buy them again, YES. without a doubt. 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Mjharden said:

Did you go with the Stage 1 or Stage 2. And if Stage 2, did you go with tubular or billet aluminum upper control arms. Debating on going with Icon, but not sure if I need the upper control arms or not...I have a Trail Boss.

Thanks

2.5 cdc with tubular

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, FirstAscent said:

Do you NEED them, no. Do you WANT them. yes :)

 

Their control arms typically offer more travel when combined with their coilovers and also provide better angles after being lifted. However, some lifts are designed around the factory UCA so they aren't required.

 

I've had their billet UCA's on two different trucks now. Did I notice a difference? No, not really. I had good alignments with the factory arms but damn do the billet UCA's look good! The billet arms also offer a LOT more adjustability and fine tuning.

 

I should add that my experience only comes from using the truck as a daily driver and not off road where I imagine UCA's play more of a role. 

 

Would I buy them again, YES. without a doubt. 

Jaimie, thanks for your response. I guess ultimately what I'm wondering is whether I "need" them if I'm simply leveling out the front with the rear. I believe if I remember my measurements correctly, my front is about 1.5" higher than the rear on my Trail Boss.

 

I understand with some of these "leveling/lift" kits, that folks are also adding taller rear blocks and cranking their coilovers to the maximum 2.5-3 inches. In that case, I could see needing new upper control arms among other things I'm sure, which is why the BDS kit has so many components.

 

If I'm simply leveling out the front 1.5 inches, are they required (will my truck align just fine)?

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Mjharden said:

Jaimie, thanks for your response. I guess ultimately what I'm wondering is whether I "need" them if I'm simply leveling out the front with the rear. I believe if I remember my measurements correctly, my front is about 1.5" higher than the rear on my Trail Boss.

 

I understand with some of these "leveling/lift" kits, that folks are also adding taller rear blocks and cranking their coilovers to the maximum 2.5-3 inches. In that case, I could see needing new upper control arms among other things I'm sure, which is why the BDS kit has so many components.

 

If I'm simply leveling out the front 1.5 inches, are they required (will my truck align just fine)?

 

 

Even if just leveling your TB upper arms are recommended.  If you just want to level the Ready Lift SST kit is the best bang for the buck - $510 plus tax, free shipping from Tire Rack for the AT4/TB.  If you want to add upgraded shocks down the road you could, but it would not be as "complete" a designed system as BDS is offering - so you just have to decide how many $ you want to spend the pick your best option. 

 

Ready Lift Leveling Kit Link:  https://www.readylift.com/at4-trail-boss-plus-2-0-sst-lift-kit-gm-1500-at4-trail-boss-4wd-2019.html

 

Watch this video from Ready Lift as to why you need to add upper control arms - you are correcting geometry the stock upper arm can't handle.

Video:  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...
Posted

Did the Ready Lift 2" SST level kit on my 2019 AT4 Carbon Pro - lost use of "auto 4WD" as RL does not recommend use.  I just traded it for a 2020 AT4 Carbon Pro to get trailer tow mirros and new trailer tow camera tech - as I tow fairly often.  

 

Going with BDS 2.5" kit with Fox 2.5 DSC coilovers - figured might as well do it right this time! 

 

Looking forward to the upgrade - hope to have it install in a few weeks! 

 

link:  https://bds-suspension.com/kit-customizer?kid=754F

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...