Jump to content

2014 6.2 bit the dust


Recommended Posts

Posted

It never caused me issues either but a few reason I can think of. I've read a few issues with the collapsible lifters failing. Also, if your digging into the motor to upgrade the parts, might as well go to an upgraded camshaft and most of the popular MFG's cams are DOD delete. But shoot my truck made it over 100,00 with it enabled so who really knows. To each their own. 

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
33 minutes ago, amxguy1970 said:

So if I have 120k and DoD I am safe? What if I push it to 135k and have DoD will my motor fail in spectacular fashion? Why wouldn't they just upgrade if it fails (which it most likely won't)?

There isn't, just another DoD hater because they hear a few other random people having an issue... They see 15 posts about a failure on forum of a truck that has built millions of these and want to make a mountain out of a mole hill on a less than a tenth of a percent failure rate?

 

Tylery

My bad. Didn't mean to make it look like I was blaming the failure on DOD and I'm not really a hater, just a personal preference type of thing I guess. Shouldn't have mentioned it. 

Posted

Is it wise to have a hollow valve stem? Seems like of counter-intuitive strength and bending wise, but does make sense for reducing mass of moving parts. Is that common? 

Posted
1 hour ago, L86 All Terrain said:

Is it wise to have a hollow valve stem? Seems like of counter-intuitive strength and bending wise, but does make sense for reducing mass of moving parts. Is that common? 

Only from a Deflection stand point but even then Very slightly!  In this configuration HOLLOW is absolutely the way to go for strength and total mass.

Posted

Might be worth politely asking if GM will provide some assistance. You are 14k miles over the powertrain warranty and yes, you have a transmission tune, but it’s worth asking regardless. 
 

All they can do is say no. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Snowcamo said:

Isnt that where oil comes from to lubricate the rocker tip/ roller?

Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk
 

That’s the pushrod.  

Posted
38 minutes ago, RE1 said:

Might be worth politely asking if GM will provide some assistance. You are 14k miles over the powertrain warranty and yes, you have a transmission tune, but it’s worth asking regardless. 
 

All they can do is say no. 

I did, they said no. I really didn’t go full on Karen or anything, but.  Offered a “good deal” on a ‘19.  Wasn’t being an a$$, dealer was just trying to help out as best he could in his area of control.  

Posted
That’s the pushrod.  
Heck ya. Skimming through while at work... Less weight at the valve equals less stress on the spring.

Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk

Posted

DOD delete is important because you remove the head and replace those crap AMF lifters with LS7 lifters.

 

I had a broken spring on number 5 exhaust valve I believe at 120K miles on my 2014 L86.  But got very luck and it didn't drop the valve.  I think it was 5 dollars for the updated spring from GM and 35 for the spring compression tool from Texas Speed and I was back on the road.

 

THEN

 

A month later I pulled out of a parking lot a lifter on number 7 stuck.  I drove it back to the house about a mile away sounding like shit.  Then it made a bang and all the lights went away and it started running fine.  I guess the stuck lifter released.  But now I had a tick.

 

So I pulled it in the garage and did DOD delete and TSP 218/226

Posted
DOD delete is important because you remove the head and replace those crap AMF lifters with LS7 lifters.
 
I had a broken spring on number 5 exhaust valve I believe at 120K miles on my 2014 L86.  But got very luck and it didn't drop the valve.  I think it was 5 dollars for the updated spring from GM and 35 for the spring compression tool from Texas Speed and I was back on the road.
 
THEN
 
A month later I pulled out of a parking lot a lifter on number 7 stuck.  I drove it back to the house about a mile away sounding like shit.  Then it made a bang and all the lights went away and it started running fine.  I guess the stuck lifter released.  But now I had a tick.
 
So I pulled it in the garage and did DOD delete and TSP 218/226
How you liking the cam/ tune?

Sent from my LG-G710 using Tapatalk

Posted

I don't know. You don't see many motors that go through this crap that don't have the DOD/AFM. Mine ran like a top until I decided I wanted to see just how much I could keep it in 4 cylinder mode. Two weeks, trained my right foot to pretty much keep it in 4 cylinder mode as much as possible. Then boom, a lifter failed and took out a pushrod on it's way. But people claim to love it, people claim to hate it. I know once I got mine back out of the shop the first thing I did was contact BBP and got that tuned out. Didn't have the funds to pull and tear down the motor for the actual "DOD/AFM delete kit" but maybe one day. I can also tell you I used to claim that I couldn't feel the truck going in and out of 4 cylinder mode until it didn't.

 

To the OP - sucks. But now time to build a bigger/better motor.

Posted

Was there a bad batch of springs?

 

I’ve seen info on this forum about keepers coming out and some bad head castings. 
 

Guess we know why 2016+ models only have 60k powertrain warranty. 
 

my 2018 just turned 10k miles. I’ll probably hit the 5 year mark before 60k miles. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, g2full said:

 

To the OP - sucks. But now time to build a bigger/better motor.

Ya know, you may be right. I have a new long block coming tomorrow.  
 

At the very least, I’m gonna be suspicious of the factory springs. Hopefully it has the “upgraded” springs, but I have yet to find out what these are.  
 

Anyone have any recommendations?  I have HP Tuners, and I’m not half bad with it.  Engine will be on a stand for as long as I can keep the wife at bay while I drive her car LOL.  

Posted

OP - that really sucks about your engine. Good news is you will have a better than new replacement in a truck that’s probably paid off. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 544 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...